CVE-2020-36726
CVE-2020-36726
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
The Ultimate Reviews plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in versions up to, and including, 2.1.32 via deserialization of untrusted input in several vulnerable functions. This allows unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. No POP chain is present in the vulnerable plugin.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2020-36726
WordPress Ultimate Reviews Plugin – PHP Object Injection Vulnerability
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Type
CVE-2020-36726 is a PHP Object Injection vulnerability resulting from insecure deserialization of untrusted input in the Ultimate Reviews WordPress plugin (versions ≤ 2.1.32). This flaw allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary PHP objects into the application’s execution context.
CVSS v3.1 Scoring & Severity
| Metric | Score | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Base Score | 9.8 (Critical) | High impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA triad) due to unauthenticated remote exploitation. |
| Vector | AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H | Network-exploitable, low attack complexity, no privileges required, no user interaction, and high impact on all security objectives. |
| Exploitability | 3.9 (High) | Straightforward exploitation via crafted payloads. |
| Impact | 5.9 (High) | Full compromise of affected WordPress sites possible if a POP (Property-Oriented Programming) chain exists in the environment. |
Key Observations
- No POP Chain in Plugin: The vulnerability alone does not include a pre-existing POP chain within the plugin, limiting immediate arbitrary code execution (ACE). However, if other plugins/themes introduce gadget chains, exploitation could lead to remote code execution (RCE), file deletion, or privilege escalation.
- Unauthenticated Access: The flaw does not require authentication, making it highly attractive for mass exploitation.
- Low Attack Complexity: Exploitation relies on standard deserialization techniques, requiring minimal expertise.
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Mechanism
PHP Object Injection occurs when an attacker controls serialized data passed to unserialize(), allowing them to instantiate arbitrary objects with attacker-controlled properties. The Ultimate Reviews plugin deserializes untrusted input in multiple functions, enabling this attack.
Step-by-Step Exploitation
-
Identify Vulnerable Endpoints:
- The plugin processes user-supplied serialized data in functions such as:
ultimate_reviews_ajax_submit_review()ultimate_reviews_ajax_load_more_reviews()
- These functions likely accept serialized input via HTTP parameters (e.g.,
POSTdata).
- The plugin processes user-supplied serialized data in functions such as:
-
Craft Malicious Payload:
- An attacker generates a serialized PHP object with malicious properties (e.g.,
__wakeup(),__destruct(), or other magic methods). - Example payload (simplified):
O:8:"Example":1:{s:4:"data";s:20:"<?php system('id'); ?>";} - If a POP chain exists (e.g., via another plugin like File Manager or PHP Everywhere), this could lead to RCE.
- An attacker generates a serialized PHP object with malicious properties (e.g.,
-
Deliver Payload:
- The attacker sends a crafted HTTP request to a vulnerable WordPress site with the serialized payload in a parameter (e.g.,
review_data). - Example request:
POST /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=ultimate_reviews_submit_review HTTP/1.1 Host: vulnerable-site.com Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded review_data=O:8:"Example":1:{s:4:"data";s:20:"<?php system('id'); ?>";}
- The attacker sends a crafted HTTP request to a vulnerable WordPress site with the serialized payload in a parameter (e.g.,
-
Trigger Deserialization:
- The plugin deserializes the input, instantiating the attacker-controlled object.
- If a POP chain exists, arbitrary code execution occurs.
Post-Exploitation Scenarios
- Without POP Chain:
- Limited impact (e.g., denial of service via memory exhaustion or object destruction).
- Potential for information disclosure if sensitive data is stored in deserialized objects.
- With POP Chain:
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): Execute arbitrary PHP code (e.g.,
system(),exec()). - File Manipulation: Delete, modify, or upload files (e.g., backdoors, defacement).
- Privilege Escalation: If combined with other vulnerabilities (e.g., weak file permissions).
- Persistence: Install web shells or malware for long-term access.
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): Execute arbitrary PHP code (e.g.,
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Vulnerable Software
- Plugin Name: Ultimate Reviews (WordPress Plugin)
- Vendor: Unknown (likely a third-party developer)
- Affected Versions: ≤ 2.1.32
- Patched Version: ≥ 2.1.33 (or later, if available)
Environmental Dependencies
- WordPress Core: Any version (vulnerability is plugin-specific).
- PHP Version: All versions supporting
unserialize()(PHP 5.x–8.x). - Additional Risks:
- If other plugins/themes introduce POP chains, exploitation impact increases.
- Sites with register_globals enabled (deprecated but still present in legacy systems) are at higher risk.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
-
Patch the Plugin:
- Upgrade to Ultimate Reviews v2.1.33 or later (if available).
- If no patch exists, disable or remove the plugin until a fix is released.
-
Temporary Workarounds:
- Input Validation: Modify the plugin to validate and sanitize all serialized input before deserialization.
- Disable Unsafe Functions: Restrict
unserialize()usage via PHP configuration (disable_functionsinphp.ini). - Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules:
- Block requests containing serialized PHP objects (e.g., regex for
O:[0-9]+:"). - Deploy rules from OWASP ModSecurity Core Rule Set (CRS) or Wordfence.
- Block requests containing serialized PHP objects (e.g., regex for
-
Network-Level Protections:
- Isolate WordPress Instances: Restrict access to
/wp-admin/admin-ajax.phpvia IP whitelisting. - Rate Limiting: Prevent brute-force or mass exploitation attempts.
- Isolate WordPress Instances: Restrict access to
Long-Term Security Hardening
-
Secure Deserialization Practices:
- Replace
unserialize()with JSON-based serialization (json_encode()/json_decode()) where possible. - If deserialization is unavoidable, use whitelisting for allowed classes.
- Replace
-
Dependency Management:
- Regularly audit WordPress plugins/themes for vulnerabilities using tools like:
- WPScan (
wpscan --url <site> --enumerate vp) - Wordfence or Sucuri Scanner
- WPScan (
- Remove unused or outdated plugins.
- Regularly audit WordPress plugins/themes for vulnerabilities using tools like:
-
Runtime Protections:
- PHP Hardening:
- Disable dangerous functions (
exec,passthru,shell_exec,proc_open). - Enable
open_basedirto restrict file system access.
- Disable dangerous functions (
- WordPress Hardening:
- Disable file editing in the WordPress dashboard (
define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);). - Enforce least privilege for database and file system permissions.
- Disable file editing in the WordPress dashboard (
- PHP Hardening:
-
Monitoring & Detection:
- Log Analysis: Monitor for unusual
unserialize()calls in PHP error logs. - Intrusion Detection: Deploy OSSEC or Snort to detect exploitation attempts.
- File Integrity Monitoring (FIM): Use Tripwire or AIDE to detect unauthorized file changes.
- Log Analysis: Monitor for unusual
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
WordPress Ecosystem Risks:
- WordPress powers ~43% of all websites, making plugin vulnerabilities a high-value target for attackers.
- Similar deserialization flaws have been exploited in other plugins (e.g., CVE-2021-24284 in WP Super Cache, CVE-2019-9978 in Social Warfare).
- Supply Chain Attacks: Compromised plugins can lead to mass exploitation of thousands of sites.
-
Exploitation Trends:
- Automated Scanning: Attackers use tools like Nuclei or WPScan to identify vulnerable sites.
- Botnet Recruitment: Exploited sites may be added to DDoS botnets (e.g., Mirai variants) or used for SEO spam.
- Ransomware & Cryptojacking: RCE via deserialization can lead to ransomware deployment (e.g., LockBit, BlackCat) or cryptocurrency mining.
-
Regulatory & Compliance Risks:
- GDPR/CCPA Violations: Unauthorized data access may lead to legal penalties.
- PCI DSS Non-Compliance: If payment data is exposed, merchants may face fines or card brand restrictions.
Threat Actor Motivations
| Threat Actor | Likely Exploitation Goals |
|---|---|
| Script Kiddies | Defacement, simple RCE for bragging rights. |
| Cybercriminals | Data theft, ransomware, cryptojacking. |
| APT Groups | Persistent access for espionage or lateral movement. |
| Hacktivists | Website defacement, political messaging. |
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability stems from improper handling of user-controlled serialized data in the Ultimate Reviews plugin. Key issues include:
-
Lack of Input Validation:
- The plugin directly passes user-supplied data to
unserialize()without sanitization. - Example vulnerable code snippet (hypothetical):
$review_data = unserialize($_POST['review_data']); // Unsafe deserialization
- The plugin directly passes user-supplied data to
-
Insecure Deserialization Patterns:
- PHP’s
unserialize()is inherently dangerous when processing untrusted input, as it can instantiate arbitrary objects. - Magic methods (
__wakeup(),__destruct()) can be abused for malicious actions.
- PHP’s
-
Missing POP Chain Mitigation:
- While the plugin itself lacks a POP chain, the presence of other vulnerable plugins (e.g., File Manager, PHP Everywhere) could enable RCE.
Exploit Development Considerations
- POP Chain Discovery:
- Use PHPGGC (PHP Generic Gadget Chains) to identify potential gadgets in the WordPress environment.
- Example gadget chain (if another plugin introduces
File_Put_Contents):O:20:"File_Put_Contents":2:{s:8:"filename";s:10:"/tmp/shell";s:4:"data";s:20:"<?php system($_GET['c']); ?>";}
- Bypass Techniques:
- Type Confusion: Manipulate serialized data types to bypass checks.
- Nested Objects: Chain multiple objects to achieve RCE.
- Post-Exploitation:
- Web Shell Deployment: Upload a PHP shell (e.g., Weevely, C99) for persistent access.
- Database Dumping: Extract sensitive data (e.g., user credentials, payment info).
Detection & Forensics
- Indicators of Compromise (IoCs):
- Logs:
- Unusual
unserialize()calls in PHP error logs. - Suspicious HTTP requests containing serialized payloads (e.g.,
O:[0-9]+:").
- Unusual
- Filesystem:
- Unexpected PHP files in
/wp-content/uploads/or/tmp/. - Modified
.htaccessorwp-config.phpfiles.
- Unexpected PHP files in
- Network:
- Outbound connections to known C2 servers (e.g., Cobalt Strike, Metasploit).
- Logs:
- Forensic Analysis:
- Memory Forensics: Use Volatility or Rekall to detect injected PHP objects.
- Timeline Analysis: Correlate file modifications with exploitation attempts.
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Considerations
- Ethical Disclosure: PoCs should only be developed for authorized penetration testing.
- Safe Testing: Use isolated environments (e.g., Docker, VMs) to avoid unintended damage.
- Mitigation Validation: Test patches in a staging environment before production deployment.
Conclusion & Recommendations
CVE-2020-36726 represents a critical unauthenticated PHP Object Injection vulnerability in the Ultimate Reviews WordPress plugin. While the lack of a built-in POP chain limits immediate RCE, the flaw remains highly dangerous due to its low exploitation complexity and potential for chaining with other vulnerabilities.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams
- Patch Immediately: Upgrade to the latest plugin version or disable the plugin if no patch is available.
- Monitor for Exploitation: Deploy WAF rules and log analysis to detect attack attempts.
- Hardening: Implement secure deserialization practices and PHP hardening measures.
- Threat Intelligence: Stay updated on WordPress plugin vulnerabilities via CISA KEV, Wordfence, and WPScan.
Final Risk Assessment
| Factor | Risk Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Exploitability | High | Unauthenticated, low complexity. |
| Impact | Critical | Potential RCE if POP chain exists. |
| Prevalence | Medium | WordPress plugin vulnerabilities are common. |
| Mitigation Feasibility | High | Patching and WAF rules are effective. |
Action Priority: Critical – Immediate patching and monitoring are required to prevent exploitation.