CVE-2022-43467
CVE-2022-43467
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the PQS format coord_file functionality of Open Babel 3.1.1 and master commit 530dbfa3. A specially crafted malformed file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2022-43467
CVE ID: CVE-2022-43467 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Vulnerability Type: Out-of-Bounds Write (CWE-787) Affected Software: Open Babel (versions 3.1.1 and master commit 530dbfa3) Discovered By: Cisco Talos (TALOS-2022-1671)
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Technical Overview
CVE-2022-43467 is an out-of-bounds write (OOBW) vulnerability in Open Babel, an open-source chemistry toolkit used for molecular file format conversion and chemical data processing. The flaw resides in the PQS (Parallel Quantum Solutions) format coord_file functionality, where improper bounds checking allows a maliciously crafted input file to write data beyond the allocated memory buffer.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8 - Critical)
The vulnerability has been assigned a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (Critical) due to the following factors:
| CVSS Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network | Exploitable remotely via file upload/download. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low | No special conditions required; trivial to exploit. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None | No authentication or elevated privileges needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None | Exploitation occurs automatically upon file processing. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged | Affects the vulnerable component (Open Babel) only. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High | Arbitrary code execution (ACE) can lead to full system compromise. |
| Integrity (I) | High | Malicious code execution can modify system/data integrity. |
| Availability (A) | High | Crash or denial-of-service (DoS) possible; ACE can disrupt services. |
Key Takeaways:
- Remote Exploitability: Attackers can trigger the vulnerability by tricking a user into processing a malicious PQS file (e.g., via email, file-sharing, or web upload).
- Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE): Successful exploitation allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the affected application, potentially leading to full system compromise.
- Low Attack Complexity: No advanced techniques are required; a simple malformed file is sufficient.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors
-
File-Based Exploitation
- An attacker crafts a malicious PQS file with specially designed
coord_filedata that triggers the OOBW. - The victim processes the file using Open Babel (e.g., via command-line tools, GUI applications, or automated scripts).
- Upon parsing, the vulnerable function writes data outside the intended buffer, leading to memory corruption.
- An attacker crafts a malicious PQS file with specially designed
-
Phishing & Social Engineering
- Attackers distribute malicious PQS files via:
- Email attachments (e.g., "chemical_structure.pqs").
- Compromised file-sharing platforms (e.g., research data repositories).
- Malicious websites offering "free chemical modeling tools."
- Attackers distribute malicious PQS files via:
-
Supply Chain Attacks
- Open Babel is integrated into various scientific and chemical modeling software (e.g., Avogadro, PyMOL, RDKit).
- A compromised dependency could lead to widespread exploitation.
Exploitation Mechanics
-
Memory Corruption via OOBW
- The vulnerability occurs in the
PQSFormat::ReadMolecule()function (or similar) when parsingcoord_fileentries. - A malformed file contains excessive or misaligned coordinate data, causing the parser to write beyond the allocated buffer.
- This can overwrite:
- Return addresses (enabling ROP-based ACE).
- Function pointers (direct code execution).
- Heap metadata (leading to heap exploitation).
- The vulnerability occurs in the
-
Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE)
- If the OOBW overwrites a return address or function pointer, an attacker can redirect execution to a malicious payload (e.g., shellcode).
- Modern exploitation techniques (e.g., Return-Oriented Programming (ROP), Heap Spraying) can bypass mitigations like ASLR and DEP.
-
Denial-of-Service (DoS)
- Even if ACE is not achieved, the OOBW can corrupt critical memory structures, leading to application crashes or system instability.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Versions
- Open Babel 3.1.1 (latest stable release at the time of discovery).
- Master commit
530dbfa3(development branch).
Potentially Affected Integrations
Open Babel is widely used in:
- Chemical modeling software (e.g., Avogadro, PyMOL, Jmol).
- Bioinformatics tools (e.g., RDKit, Open Babel Python bindings).
- Automated chemical data processing pipelines (e.g., drug discovery workflows).
Note: If these tools use a vulnerable version of Open Babel for PQS file parsing, they may inherit the vulnerability.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
-
Apply Patches
- Upgrade to the latest patched version of Open Babel (if available).
- Monitor Open Babel’s GitHub repository for security updates.
-
Workarounds (If Patching is Delayed)
- Disable PQS file parsing if not required.
- Use input validation to reject malformed PQS files before processing.
- Sandbox Open Babel in a restricted environment (e.g., Docker container, seccomp filters).
-
Network-Level Protections
- Block PQS file uploads in web applications unless absolutely necessary.
- Scan incoming files with antivirus/EDR solutions to detect malicious payloads.
Long-Term Mitigations
-
Memory Safety Improvements
- Replace unsafe functions (e.g.,
strcpy,memcpy) with bounds-checked alternatives (strncpy,memcpy_s). - Enable compiler protections (e.g.,
-fstack-protector,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, ASLR, DEP).
- Replace unsafe functions (e.g.,
-
Fuzz Testing & Code Audits
- Integrate fuzzing (e.g., AFL++, LibFuzzer) into the development pipeline to detect similar vulnerabilities.
- Conduct static/dynamic analysis (e.g., Coverity, Valgrind) to identify memory corruption issues.
-
Least Privilege Principle
- Run Open Babel with minimal permissions (e.g., non-root user, restricted filesystem access).
- Use containerization (Docker, Kubernetes) to limit blast radius.
-
User Awareness Training
- Educate researchers and developers on safe file handling practices.
- Warn against opening untrusted PQS files from unknown sources.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
Targeting Scientific & Research Communities
- Open Babel is widely used in academia, pharmaceuticals, and biotech.
- Attackers may exploit this vulnerability to steal intellectual property (e.g., drug formulas, chemical research).
-
Supply Chain Risks
- Many scientific tools embed Open Babel, creating a ripple effect if left unpatched.
- A single compromised dependency could lead to widespread exploitation.
-
Exploitation in the Wild
- Given the low complexity and high impact, this vulnerability is an attractive target for:
- APT groups (espionage, data theft).
- Cybercriminals (ransomware, cryptojacking).
- Script kiddies (proof-of-concept exploits).
- Given the low complexity and high impact, this vulnerability is an attractive target for:
-
Regulatory & Compliance Risks
- Organizations handling sensitive chemical data (e.g., FDA-regulated entities) may face compliance violations (e.g., HIPAA, GDPR) if exploited.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
- Vulnerable Function:
PQSFormat::ReadMolecule()(or similar insrc/formats/pqsformat.cpp). - Issue: The function fails to validate the size of
coord_fileentries before writing to a fixed-size buffer. - Exploit Trigger: A PQS file with malformed coordinate data (e.g., excessive atoms, negative indices) causes an OOBW.
Exploitation Steps (Proof-of-Concept)
-
Craft a Malicious PQS File
- Modify the
coord_filesection to include oversized or misaligned data. - Example:
$coord_file 1000000 # Excessive atom count 1.0 2.0 3.0 # Coordinates that overflow the buffer
- Modify the
-
Trigger the Vulnerability
- Process the file with Open Babel:
obabel -ipqs malicious.pqs -oxyz
- Process the file with Open Babel:
-
Achieve Arbitrary Code Execution
- If the OOBW overwrites a return address, an attacker can redirect execution to shellcode or a ROP chain.
Detection & Forensics
-
Memory Corruption Signatures
- Crash dumps may show segmentation faults in
PQSFormat::ReadMolecule. - Valgrind/ASan reports:
==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x625000000000
- Crash dumps may show segmentation faults in
-
Network & File Analysis
- YARA rules can detect malicious PQS files:
rule Detect_Malicious_PQS { strings: $excessive_atoms = /coord_file\s+\d{6,}/ condition: $excessive_atoms }
- YARA rules can detect malicious PQS files:
-
Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR)
- Monitor for unexpected child processes spawned by Open Babel.
- Detect ROP chain execution via Control Flow Guard (CFG) violations.
Patch Analysis
- Fix: The patch likely involves:
- Bounds checking before writing to the buffer.
- Input validation for
coord_fileentries. - Safe memory allocation (e.g., dynamic resizing).
Conclusion & Recommendations
CVE-2022-43467 is a critical memory corruption vulnerability in Open Babel that enables arbitrary code execution with minimal user interaction. Given its high severity (CVSS 9.8) and low exploitation complexity, organizations using Open Babel must patch immediately or implement workarounds to mitigate risk.
Key Recommendations:
✅ Patch Open Babel to the latest secure version. ✅ Restrict PQS file processing in untrusted environments. ✅ Deploy EDR/XDR solutions to detect exploitation attempts. ✅ Conduct a security audit of all Open Babel integrations. ✅ Educate users on safe file handling practices.
Failure to address this vulnerability could result in data breaches, intellectual property theft, or full system compromise, particularly in research and pharmaceutical sectors.
References: