CVE-2023-20105
CVE-2023-20105
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- Low
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
A vulnerability in the change password functionality of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with Read-only credentials to elevate privileges to Administrator on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to incorrect handling of password change requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to the application as a Read-only user and sending a crafted request to the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to alter the passwords of any user on the system, including an administrative user, and then impersonate that user. Note: Cisco Expressway Series refers to the Expressway Control (Expressway-C) device and the Expressway Edge (Expressway-E) device.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-20105
CVE ID: CVE-2023-20105 CVSS Score: 9.6 (Critical) Affected Systems: Cisco Expressway Series (Expressway-C & Expressway-E) and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS)
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2023-20105 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco Expressway Series and TelePresence VCS, stemming from improper authorization checks in the password change functionality. An authenticated attacker with Read-only credentials can exploit this flaw to elevate privileges to Administrator, enabling unauthorized password modifications for any user, including administrative accounts.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.6 - Critical)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
| Metric | Score | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network | Exploitable remotely via web interface. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low | No specialized conditions required. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | Low | Only Read-only access needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S) | Changed | Impacts other users (privilege escalation). |
| Confidentiality (C) | High | Attacker gains full administrative control. |
| Integrity (I) | High | Can modify passwords and impersonate users. |
| Availability (A) | High | Potential for denial-of-service via credential changes. |
Key Takeaways:
- High Impact: Full administrative control over the system.
- Low Attack Complexity: Exploitable with minimal privileges (Read-only).
- Network-Exploitable: No physical access required.
- Scope Change: Affects multiple users, not just the attacker.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Workflow
-
Initial Access:
- Attacker obtains Read-only credentials (e.g., via phishing, credential stuffing, or insider threat).
- Authenticates to the Cisco Expressway/VCS web-based management interface.
-
Crafted Request Submission:
- The attacker sends a maliciously crafted HTTP request to the password change endpoint.
- Due to improper authorization checks, the system processes the request as if it came from an Administrator.
-
Privilege Escalation:
- The attacker modifies the password of an administrative user (or any other user).
- Logs in as the compromised Administrator, gaining full control over the system.
Technical Exploitation Details
- Vulnerable Endpoint: Likely a REST API or web form handling password changes (e.g.,
/api/v1/users/password). - Exploitation Method:
- Parameter Tampering: Modifying the
user_idortarget_userfield in the request to bypass authorization. - Session Hijacking: If session tokens are not properly validated, an attacker could forge requests.
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery): If anti-CSRF tokens are missing, an attacker could trick a Read-only user into submitting a malicious request.
- Parameter Tampering: Modifying the
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Considerations
While no public PoC exists at the time of analysis, a hypothetical exploit might involve:
POST /api/v1/users/password HTTP/1.1
Host: expressway.example.com
Cookie: session_id=READ_ONLY_USER_SESSION
Content-Type: application/json
{
"user_id": "admin",
"new_password": "attacker_controlled_password"
}
If the backend fails to validate that the requesting user (READ_ONLY_USER_SESSION) has permissions to modify admin, the password change succeeds.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Products
| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Cisco Expressway Series (Expressway-C & Expressway-E) | All versions prior to X14.0.7 | X14.0.7 and later |
| Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) | All versions prior to X14.0.7 | X14.0.7 and later |
Detection Methods
- Cisco Advisory Check: Verify system version against Cisco’s official advisory.
- Log Analysis: Monitor for unusual password change requests from Read-only users.
- Network Traffic Inspection: Detect anomalous API calls to
/api/v1/users/passwordwith modifieduser_idfields.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
-
Apply Patches:
- Upgrade to Cisco Expressway/VCS X14.0.7 or later.
- If patching is delayed, disable password change functionality for Read-only users via ACLs.
-
Network-Level Protections:
- Restrict Access: Limit web management interface access to trusted IP ranges (e.g., via firewall rules).
- WAF Rules: Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to block suspicious password change requests.
-
Monitoring & Detection:
- Enable Logging: Ensure all authentication and password change events are logged.
- SIEM Alerts: Set up alerts for multiple failed password change attempts or unauthorized modifications.
- User Behavior Analytics (UBA): Detect anomalous activity from Read-only accounts.
-
Compensating Controls:
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Enforce MFA for all administrative access.
- Least Privilege: Audit and restrict Read-only user permissions where possible.
- Session Management: Implement short-lived session tokens and strict session validation.
Long-Term Recommendations
- Regular Vulnerability Scanning: Use tools like Nessus, Qualys, or Cisco’s own PSIRT advisories to detect unpatched systems.
- Security Hardening: Follow CIS Benchmarks for Cisco Expressway/VCS.
- Incident Response Plan: Ensure a privilege escalation response playbook is in place.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Enterprise Risk
- High Likelihood of Exploitation: Given the low attack complexity and high impact, this vulnerability is an attractive target for:
- Insider Threats (malicious employees with Read-only access).
- APT Groups (e.g., state-sponsored actors targeting video conferencing infrastructure).
- Ransomware Operators (gaining persistence via admin access).
Industry-Specific Concerns
- Healthcare & Finance: Cisco Expressway/VCS is widely used in telemedicine and financial video conferencing, making this a high-value target for data exfiltration.
- Government & Defense: Unauthorized access could lead to espionage or disruption of critical communications.
Broader Implications
- Supply Chain Risks: If exploited, attackers could compromise third-party integrations (e.g., Microsoft Teams, Zoom).
- Compliance Violations: Failure to patch may result in non-compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, or NIST standards.
- Reputation Damage: A successful exploit could lead to loss of customer trust and legal liabilities.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
- Improper Authorization Checks: The password change functionality does not validate whether the requesting user has sufficient privileges to modify another user’s password.
- Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR): The API likely accepts a
user_idparameter without verifying if the authenticated user has rights over that ID. - Session Management Flaws: If session tokens are not properly tied to user roles, an attacker could forge requests.
Exploitation Indicators (IOCs)
| Indicator | Description |
|---|---|
| Log Entries | Password change request for user 'admin' from Read-only user 'attacker' |
| Network Traffic | Unusual POST /api/v1/users/password requests with modified user_id |
| Authentication Logs | Multiple failed login attempts followed by a successful admin login from an unexpected IP. |
Forensic Investigation Steps
-
Check Authentication Logs:
- Identify Read-only users who initiated password changes.
- Correlate with successful admin logins post-exploitation.
-
Analyze Web Server Logs:
- Look for anomalous API calls to
/api/v1/users/password. - Check for unusual
user_idvalues in requests.
- Look for anomalous API calls to
-
Memory Forensics (if available):
- Dump process memory of the Expressway/VCS service to detect injected payloads.
- Check for unauthorized session tokens in memory.
-
Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR):
- Use Cisco Secure Endpoint or CrowdStrike to detect unusual child processes spawned by the web service.
Reverse Engineering Considerations
- Binary Analysis: If source code is unavailable, reverse-engineer the web service binary to identify:
- Authorization check functions (e.g.,
check_user_permissions()). - Password change handlers (e.g.,
handle_password_update()).
- Authorization check functions (e.g.,
- Fuzzing: Use Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP to fuzz the password change endpoint for IDOR vulnerabilities.
Conclusion & Key Takeaways
CVE-2023-20105 is a critical privilege escalation vulnerability with severe implications for organizations using Cisco Expressway/VCS. Given its low attack complexity and high impact, immediate patching is essential. Security teams should: ✅ Apply Cisco’s X14.0.7 patch without delay. ✅ Monitor for exploitation attempts via logs and SIEM. ✅ Enforce least privilege and MFA for all administrative access. ✅ Conduct a forensic investigation if compromise is suspected.
Failure to mitigate this vulnerability could result in full system compromise, data breaches, and regulatory penalties. Organizations should treat this as a top-priority security risk.
References: