CVE-2023-20586
CVE-2023-20586
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
A potential vulnerability was reported in Radeon™ Software Crimson ReLive Edition which may allow escalation of privilege. Radeon™ Software Crimson ReLive Edition falls outside of the security support lifecycle and AMD does not plan to release any mitigations
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-20586
CVE ID: CVE-2023-20586 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Vulnerability Type: Privilege Escalation Affected Software: AMD Radeon™ Software Crimson ReLive Edition (End-of-Life)
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Overview
CVE-2023-20586 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in AMD Radeon™ Software Crimson ReLive Edition, a legacy graphics driver suite. The flaw allows an attacker with local access to escalate privileges, potentially gaining SYSTEM/root-level control over the affected system.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8 - Critical)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
| Metric | Score | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely if combined with another vulnerability (e.g., RCE). |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None (N) | No prior privileges needed (local user access sufficient). |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S) | Changed (C) | Affects system integrity and confidentiality beyond the vulnerable component. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High (H) | Full system compromise possible. |
| Integrity (I) | High (H) | Arbitrary code execution at elevated privileges. |
| Availability (A) | High (H) | Potential for system disruption or persistence. |
Key Takeaways:
- Critical severity due to low attack complexity, no privileges required, and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
- End-of-Life (EOL) software means no official patches will be released, increasing long-term risk.
- Local exploitation is the primary vector, but remote exploitation is possible if chained with other vulnerabilities (e.g., browser-based RCE).
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Primary Attack Vector: Local Privilege Escalation (LPE)
The vulnerability likely stems from improper access control, memory corruption, or insecure driver interactions in the Radeon Software stack. Common exploitation techniques include:
A. Kernel-Mode Driver Exploitation
-
Driver Memory Corruption:
- The Radeon driver may expose IOCTL (Input/Output Control) handlers with insufficient input validation.
- An attacker could craft malicious input to trigger buffer overflows, use-after-free (UAF), or type confusion, leading to arbitrary code execution in kernel mode.
- Example: CVE-2021-26341 (AMD GPU driver LPE) involved similar IOCTL abuse.
-
Arbitrary Write Primitive:
- If the driver allows controlled writes to kernel memory, an attacker could overwrite security descriptors, token privileges, or function pointers to escalate privileges.
B. Race Conditions & Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU)
- The driver may perform insecure file or registry operations where a race condition allows an attacker to replace a legitimate object with a malicious one before the driver uses it.
C. Insecure Service Permissions
- The Radeon Software may install services with excessive privileges (e.g., running as
SYSTEM). - An attacker could modify service binaries or configurations to execute arbitrary code at high privileges.
D. DLL Hijacking & Side-Loading
- The software may load DLLs from insecure locations (e.g.,
C:\Program Files\AMD\with weak permissions). - An attacker could replace a legitimate DLL with a malicious one, leading to code execution in the context of the Radeon service.
Secondary Attack Vector: Remote Exploitation (Chained Attacks)
While the primary vector is local, remote exploitation is possible if combined with:
- Browser-based RCE (e.g., via a malicious website exploiting a Chrome/Edge vulnerability).
- Phishing & Malware Delivery (e.g., tricking a user into running a malicious executable that exploits CVE-2023-20586).
- Exploit Kits (e.g., leveraging the vulnerability in post-compromise privilege escalation).
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Affected Software
- AMD Radeon™ Software Crimson ReLive Edition (all versions)
- This software is End-of-Life (EOL) and no longer supported by AMD.
- Users running Windows 7, 8.1, or 10 with legacy AMD GPUs are at risk.
Affected Hardware
- AMD Radeon™ GPUs that were supported by Crimson ReLive Edition, including:
- Radeon RX 400/500 Series
- Radeon R9 Fury/Nano Series
- Radeon R9 300 Series
- Radeon R7/R9 200 Series
- APUs with Radeon Graphics (e.g., AMD A-Series, FX APUs)
Unaffected Systems
- AMD Adrenalin Edition (current driver suite) is not affected.
- Linux systems using AMDGPU drivers are unaffected (unless running Wine/Proton with Crimson ReLive).
- Modern AMD GPUs (RDNA 1/2/3) are not vulnerable as they use Adrenalin Edition.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Given that AMD will not release patches, organizations must implement compensating controls to reduce risk.
A. Immediate Mitigations
| Mitigation | Description | Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|
| Uninstall Crimson ReLive Edition | Remove the vulnerable software entirely. | High (Eliminates attack surface) |
| Replace with Adrenalin Edition | Upgrade to the latest AMD driver suite. | High (If hardware is supported) |
| Disable Radeon Software Services | Stop and disable AMD External Events Utility, AMD Fuel Service, etc. | Medium (Prevents persistence but may break functionality) |
| Apply Least Privilege | Restrict user accounts to non-admin privileges. | Medium (Limits impact of LPE) |
| Enable Windows Defender Exploit Guard (ASR) | Block untrusted and unsigned processes from running in kernel mode. | Medium (Mitigates some exploitation paths) |
| Use Application Whitelisting | Restrict execution of RadeonSoftware.exe and related binaries. | High (Prevents malicious modifications) |
B. Long-Term Strategies
- Hardware Refresh
- Replace legacy AMD GPUs with modern RDNA-based cards that support Adrenalin Edition.
- Network Segmentation
- Isolate systems running Crimson ReLive from critical infrastructure.
- Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR/XDR)
- Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect privilege escalation attempts.
- Vulnerability Scanning
- Use tools like Nessus, Qualys, or OpenVAS to identify systems with Crimson ReLive installed.
- User Awareness Training
- Educate users on phishing risks and malware prevention to reduce initial access vectors.
C. Workarounds for Legacy Systems
If uninstalling Crimson ReLive is not feasible, consider:
- Virtualization: Run legacy applications in a sandboxed VM with restricted privileges.
- Driver Isolation: Use Windows Driver Blocking to prevent loading of vulnerable drivers.
- Custom Patches: Some security vendors (e.g., 0patch) may release micropatches for EOL software.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
A. Enterprise & Government Risks
- Legacy Systems in Critical Infrastructure:
- Many industrial control systems (ICS), medical devices, and government workstations still use EOL software, including Crimson ReLive.
- APT groups (e.g., APT29, Lazarus, APT41) may exploit this in post-compromise privilege escalation.
- Supply Chain Attacks:
- If a third-party vendor still supports Crimson ReLive, attackers could compromise their update mechanisms to deliver malware.
B. Consumer & Gaming Risks
- Gaming PCs with Legacy GPUs:
- Many budget gaming rigs still use Radeon RX 400/500 series GPUs, making them high-value targets for cryptojacking, ransomware, and botnets.
- Malware Campaigns:
- Exploit kits (e.g., RIG, Fallout) may incorporate CVE-2023-20586 into their privilege escalation chains.
C. Long-Term Implications
- Increased Focus on EOL Software:
- This CVE highlights the risks of unsupported software, encouraging organizations to accelerate modernization efforts.
- Regulatory & Compliance Issues:
- NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, and CIS Controls require patch management—running EOL software may lead to compliance violations.
- Insurance & Liability Concerns:
- Cyber insurance providers may deny claims if an organization is breached due to unpatched EOL software.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
A. Root Cause Analysis (Hypothetical)
While AMD has not released detailed technical specifics, based on historical AMD driver vulnerabilities, the flaw likely involves:
-
Insecure IOCTL Handling
- The Radeon driver may expose privileged IOCTL calls (
DeviceIoControl) with insufficient input validation. - Example:
NTSTATUS DriverDispatch(DEVICE_OBJECT *DeviceObject, IRP *Irp) { PIO_STACK_LOCATION stack = IoGetCurrentIrpStackLocation(Irp); ULONG ioctlCode = stack->Parameters.DeviceIoControl.IoControlCode; PVOID inputBuffer = Irp->AssociatedIrp.SystemBuffer; if (ioctlCode == IOCTL_RADEON_EXEC) { // Missing bounds check → Buffer Overflow memcpy(kernelBuffer, inputBuffer, stack->Parameters.DeviceIoControl.InputBufferLength); } }
- The Radeon driver may expose privileged IOCTL calls (
-
Arbitrary Kernel Memory Write
- The driver may allow controlled writes to kernel memory, enabling:
- Token stealing (replacing a process token with
SYSTEM). - Function pointer hijacking (overwriting a driver callback).
- Security descriptor modification (granting full control to a malicious process).
- Token stealing (replacing a process token with
- The driver may allow controlled writes to kernel memory, enabling:
-
Race Condition in Driver Initialization
- The driver may temporarily drop privileges during initialization, allowing an attacker to hijack execution flow.
B. Exploitation Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Considerations
A hypothetical PoC for this vulnerability might involve:
- Triggering the Vulnerable IOCTL
- Open a handle to
\\.\AMDRadeonDeviceand send a craftedDeviceIoControlrequest.
- Open a handle to
- Crafting Malicious Input
- Overwrite a return address, SEH handler, or function pointer in kernel memory.
- Achieving Arbitrary Code Execution
- Use ROP (Return-Oriented Programming) to bypass DEP (Data Execution Prevention) and SMEP (Supervisor Mode Execution Protection).
- Privilege Escalation
- Modify the EPROCESS token of the current process to gain
SYSTEMprivileges.
- Modify the EPROCESS token of the current process to gain
C. Detection & Hunting Strategies
| Detection Method | Description |
|---|---|
| Windows Event Logs | Monitor Event ID 4674 (Privileged Service Called) for suspicious DeviceIoControl calls. |
| Driver Load Monitoring | Use Sysmon (Event ID 6) to detect loading of amdkmdag.sys or atikmdag.sys. |
| Process Injection Detection | Look for unexpected DLL injection into lsass.exe or winlogon.exe. |
| EDR/XDR Behavioral Analysis | Detect unusual process elevation (e.g., cmd.exe spawning as SYSTEM). |
| YARA Rules | Scan for ROP gadgets or shellcode patterns in memory dumps. |
D. Forensic Artifacts
If exploitation is suspected, analyze:
- Memory Dumps (
volatility -f memory.dmp --profile=Win10x64_19041 malfind) - Registry Keys (
HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\AMD External Events Utility) - Driver Signatures (
signtool verify /v amdkmdag.sys) - Prefetch Files (
C:\Windows\Prefetch\RADEONSOFTWARE.EXE-*.pf)
Conclusion & Recommendations
Key Takeaways
- CVE-2023-20586 is a critical LPE vulnerability in EOL AMD Radeon Software, posing significant risk to unpatched systems.
- No official patches will be released, requiring proactive mitigation.
- Exploitation is feasible via IOCTL abuse, memory corruption, or race conditions.
- Remote exploitation is possible if chained with other vulnerabilities.
Action Plan for Security Teams
- Identify & Inventory all systems running Crimson ReLive Edition.
- Uninstall or Replace the software with Adrenalin Edition where possible.
- Implement Compensating Controls (least privilege, EDR, application whitelisting).
- Monitor for Exploitation Attempts using SIEM/EDR solutions.
- Educate Users on the risks of legacy software and phishing attacks.
Final Risk Assessment
| Factor | Risk Level | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Exploitability | High | Low complexity, no privileges required. |
| Impact | Critical | Full system compromise possible. |
| Patch Availability | None | EOL software, no official fixes. |
| Likelihood of Exploitation | High | APTs, malware, and exploit kits will target this. |
| Overall Risk | Critical | Immediate action required. |
Organizations must treat this vulnerability as a high-priority risk and take decisive action to mitigate exposure.