CVE-2023-3173
CVE-2023-3173
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts in GitHub repository froxlor/froxlor prior to 2.0.20.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-3173
CVE ID: CVE-2023-3173 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Vulnerability Type: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts (CWE-307) Affected Software: Froxlor (prior to version 2.0.20) Source: Huntr.dev Bug Bounty Platform
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2023-3173 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in Froxlor, an open-source server management panel. The flaw stems from improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts, allowing attackers to perform brute-force attacks without rate-limiting or account lockout mechanisms.
CVSS v3.1 Vector Breakdown
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| AV | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely over the network. |
| AC | Low (L) | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| PR | None (N) | No privileges required; unauthenticated attackers can exploit. |
| UI | None (N) | No user interaction needed. |
| S | Unchanged (U) | Exploit does not affect other components. |
| C | High (H) | Complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| I | High (H) | Unauthorized access leads to full system control. |
| A | High (H) | Potential for denial-of-service (DoS) via repeated attempts. |
Severity Justification:
- Critical (9.8) due to:
- Unauthenticated remote exploitation (no credentials required).
- High impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
- Low attack complexity (brute-force is a well-known and easily automated attack vector).
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors
-
Brute-Force Attacks
- Attackers can systematically guess credentials (usernames/passwords) without encountering rate-limiting or account lockout.
- Tools like Hydra, Burp Suite Intruder, or custom scripts can automate the process.
-
Credential Stuffing
- If default or weak credentials are used (e.g.,
admin:admin), attackers can gain immediate access. - Leaked credentials from other breaches can be tested against Froxlor.
- If default or weak credentials are used (e.g.,
-
Password Spraying
- Attackers test a small set of common passwords against multiple accounts to avoid detection.
Exploitation Steps
-
Reconnaissance
- Identify exposed Froxlor instances via Shodan, Censys, or Google Dorking (
intitle:"Froxlor" inurl:login). - Enumerate valid usernames (if not disabled in the application).
- Identify exposed Froxlor instances via Shodan, Censys, or Google Dorking (
-
Brute-Force Execution
- Use automated tools to send repeated login attempts:
hydra -l admin -P /path/to/wordlist.txt <target_IP> http-post-form "/froxlor/index.php:loginname=^USER^&password=^PASS^:Invalid" - Alternatively, use Burp Suite to intercept and replay login requests.
- Use automated tools to send repeated login attempts:
-
Post-Exploitation
- Once authenticated, attackers can:
- Escalate privileges (if misconfigurations exist).
- Execute arbitrary commands via Froxlor’s admin panel.
- Exfiltrate sensitive data (database credentials, user information).
- Deploy malware (e.g., web shells, cryptominers).
- Once authenticated, attackers can:
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Versions
- Froxlor versions prior to 2.0.20 (all releases before the patch).
- Default installations are particularly at risk if no additional hardening is applied.
Affected Components
- Froxlor Login Page (
/froxlor/index.phpor/login.php). - API Endpoints (if authentication is not properly rate-limited).
Environmental Factors Increasing Risk
- Internet-facing Froxlor instances (common in hosting environments).
- Weak or default credentials (e.g.,
admin:admin,admin:password). - Lack of Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules to block brute-force attempts.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions (Patch Management)
-
Upgrade to Froxlor 2.0.20 or Later
- Apply the official patch from GitHub commit 4642160.
- Verify the patch by checking for rate-limiting mechanisms in the login flow.
-
Temporary Workarounds (If Patching is Delayed)
- Implement IP-based rate-limiting (e.g., fail2ban, iptables, or cloud WAF rules).
# Example fail2ban rule for Froxlor [froxlor-auth] enabled = true filter = froxlor-auth action = iptables[name=froxlor-auth, port=http, protocol=tcp] logpath = /var/log/froxlor/auth.log maxretry = 5 bantime = 3600 - Enforce account lockout after a configurable number of failed attempts.
- Disable default admin accounts or rename them to non-obvious usernames.
- Implement IP-based rate-limiting (e.g., fail2ban, iptables, or cloud WAF rules).
Long-Term Hardening Measures
-
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
- Integrate TOTP (Time-based OTP) or WebAuthn for admin accounts.
-
Strong Password Policies
- Enforce minimum 12-character passwords with complexity requirements.
- Use password managers to avoid credential reuse.
-
Network-Level Protections
- Restrict access to the Froxlor admin panel via IP whitelisting (e.g., VPN-only access).
- Deploy a Web Application Firewall (WAF) (e.g., ModSecurity, Cloudflare) to block brute-force attempts.
-
Logging and Monitoring
- Enable detailed authentication logs and set up alerts for failed login attempts.
- Use SIEM tools (e.g., Splunk, ELK Stack) to detect brute-force patterns.
-
Regular Security Audits
- Conduct penetration testing to identify misconfigurations.
- Perform code reviews to ensure no other authentication flaws exist.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
Increased Attack Surface for Hosting Providers
- Froxlor is widely used by small to medium-sized hosting providers, making it a lucrative target for attackers.
- Successful exploitation could lead to compromise of multiple customer websites hosted on the same server.
-
Rise in Automated Brute-Force Campaigns
- Attackers may scan for vulnerable Froxlor instances and add them to botnets (e.g., for cryptojacking or DDoS).
- Credential stuffing attacks may increase if default credentials are not changed.
-
Supply Chain Risks
- If Froxlor is used in managed hosting environments, a single compromise could affect multiple downstream customers.
-
Regulatory and Compliance Risks
- Organizations using Froxlor may face GDPR, PCI DSS, or HIPAA violations if sensitive data is exposed.
- Incident response requirements may be triggered if unauthorized access occurs.
Historical Context
- Similar vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2021-41223 in cPanel, CVE-2020-35846 in Webmin) have led to large-scale compromises.
- Brute-force attacks remain a top initial access vector (Verizon DBIR 2023).
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
-
Missing Rate-Limiting Mechanism
- The Froxlor login endpoint did not implement failed attempt throttling, allowing unlimited guesses.
- No account lockout or CAPTCHA was enforced after repeated failures.
-
Code-Level Vulnerability
- The flaw likely resides in the authentication controller (
lib/Froxlor/Api/Commands/Admins.phpor similar). - The patch introduces rate-limiting logic (e.g.,
$_SESSION['failed_attempts']tracking).
- The flaw likely resides in the authentication controller (
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Exploitation
-
Manual Exploitation via cURL
# Example brute-force attempt for password in $(cat wordlist.txt); do curl -X POST "http://<target>/froxlor/index.php" \ -d "loginname=admin&password=$password" \ -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \ -v | grep -q "Invalid" || echo "Success: $password" done -
Automated Exploitation with Burp Suite
- Intercept a login request and send it to Intruder.
- Configure a Sniper attack with a password wordlist.
- Observe responses for 200 OK (success) vs. 401 Unauthorized (failure).
Detection and Forensics
-
Log Analysis
- Check Froxlor logs (
/var/log/froxlor/auth.log) for:[WARNING] Failed login attempt for user 'admin' from IP 192.168.1.100 - Look for multiple failed attempts from the same IP in a short timeframe.
- Check Froxlor logs (
-
Network Traffic Analysis
- Use Wireshark/tcpdump to detect repeated POST requests to
/froxlor/index.php. - Look for unusual HTTP 401 responses in high volume.
- Use Wireshark/tcpdump to detect repeated POST requests to
-
Endpoint Detection
- Monitor for unexpected child processes (e.g.,
bash,python) spawned by the web server. - Check for unauthorized file modifications in
/var/www/froxlor/.
- Monitor for unexpected child processes (e.g.,
Patch Analysis
- The fix introduces:
- Failed attempt counter (
$_SESSION['failed_attempts']). - Temporary lockout after a threshold (e.g., 5 attempts).
- IP-based rate-limiting (optional configuration).
- Failed attempt counter (
Before Patch:
// No rate-limiting logic
if (authenticate($username, $password)) {
grant_access();
}
After Patch:
// Rate-limiting added
if ($_SESSION['failed_attempts'] >= 5) {
die("Too many attempts. Try again later.");
}
if (authenticate($username, $password)) {
grant_access();
} else {
$_SESSION['failed_attempts']++;
}
Conclusion and Recommendations
Key Takeaways
- CVE-2023-3173 is a critical authentication flaw enabling unauthenticated brute-force attacks.
- Exploitation is trivial and can lead to full system compromise.
- Immediate patching is mandatory; temporary mitigations (rate-limiting, WAF rules) should be applied if upgrades are delayed.
Action Plan for Security Teams
-
Patch Management
- Prioritize upgrading Froxlor to 2.0.20 or later.
- Test the patch in a staging environment before production deployment.
-
Threat Hunting
- Search logs for brute-force patterns (e.g., 10+ failed attempts from a single IP).
- Check for unauthorized admin logins post-exploitation.
-
Defensive Enhancements
- Implement MFA, IP whitelisting, and WAF rules.
- Conduct a security audit of all Froxlor instances.
-
Incident Response Preparedness
- Develop a playbook for brute-force attacks (isolation, forensics, recovery).
- Ensure backups are secure and tested for restoration.
Final Risk Assessment
| Factor | Risk Level | Mitigation Status |
|---|---|---|
| Exploitability | High | Patch available |
| Impact | Critical | Full system compromise possible |
| Likelihood | High | Active scanning by threat actors |
| Overall Risk | Critical | Immediate action required |
Recommendation: Treat this vulnerability as an emergency and apply patches within 24-48 hours to prevent exploitation. Monitor for signs of compromise and harden the environment against future attacks.