CVE-2023-37701
CVE-2023-37701
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
Tenda FH1203 V2.0.1.6 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the deviceId parameter in the addWifiMacFilter function.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-37701
CVE ID: CVE-2023-37701 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Affected Product: Tenda FH1203 (Firmware Version 2.0.1.6) Vulnerability Type: Stack-Based Buffer Overflow
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2023-37701 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the Tenda FH1203 V2.0.1.6 router firmware, specifically within the addWifiMacFilter function. The flaw arises due to improper bounds checking on the deviceId parameter, allowing an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory structures on the stack.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8 - Critical)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
- Attack Vector (AV:N) – Network-exploitable (remote attack surface).
- Attack Complexity (AC:L) – Low (no special conditions required).
- Privileges Required (PR:N) – None (unauthenticated exploitation).
- User Interaction (UI:N) – None (fully automated exploitation).
- Scope (S:U) – Unchanged (impact confined to the vulnerable component).
- Confidentiality (C:H) – High (arbitrary code execution possible).
- Integrity (I:H) – High (malicious code execution).
- Availability (A:H) – High (crash or denial-of-service possible).
Key Factors Contributing to Critical Severity:
- Remote Exploitability: The vulnerability can be triggered via a crafted HTTP request, making it accessible over the network.
- Unauthenticated Access: No credentials are required to exploit the flaw.
- Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE): Successful exploitation can lead to full system compromise, including root-level access.
- Low Attack Complexity: No advanced techniques (e.g., heap spraying, ROP chains) are required for basic exploitation.
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Attack Surface
The vulnerability is exposed via the Tenda router’s web interface, specifically in the MAC filtering functionality. The addWifiMacFilter function processes the deviceId parameter without proper input validation, leading to a stack overflow.
Exploitation Steps
-
Reconnaissance:
- Identify vulnerable Tenda FH1203 routers (e.g., via Shodan, Censys, or mass scanning).
- Confirm firmware version (2.0.1.6) via HTTP response headers or
/goform/getSysToolsendpoint.
-
Crafting the Exploit:
- The attacker sends a maliciously crafted HTTP POST request to the
/goform/addWifiMacFilterendpoint. - The
deviceIdparameter is populated with an oversized input (e.g., 500+ bytes), triggering the stack overflow. - Example payload structure:
POST /goform/addWifiMacFilter HTTP/1.1 Host: <TARGET_IP> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: <LENGTH> deviceId=<MALICIOUS_PAYLOAD>&mac=<VALID_MAC>&comment=<ARBITRARY_STRING> - The payload may include:
- NOP sleds (
\x90instructions) to increase reliability. - Shellcode (e.g., reverse shell, firmware modification).
- Return address overwrite to redirect execution to attacker-controlled memory.
- NOP sleds (
- The attacker sends a maliciously crafted HTTP POST request to the
-
Post-Exploitation:
- Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE): If the stack is executable, the attacker can execute shellcode directly.
- Return-Oriented Programming (ROP): If stack execution is disabled (NX bit), ROP chains can bypass DEP.
- Persistence: Modify firmware or install backdoors (e.g.,
telnetd,dropbear). - Lateral Movement: Use the compromised router as a pivot point for internal network attacks.
Exploit Availability
- Public proof-of-concept (PoC) exploits are available on GitHub (referenced in the CVE).
- The exploit can be weaponized into Metasploit modules or automated attack scripts.
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Vulnerable Product
- Tenda FH1203 Wireless Router
- Firmware Version: 2.0.1.6 (confirmed vulnerable)
- Hardware Revision: V2 (likely affects other revisions if using the same firmware base)
Potential Impact Scope
- Consumer & SOHO Deployments: Tenda routers are widely used in home and small business networks.
- Enterprise Risk: If deployed in branch offices or IoT environments, exploitation could lead to network infiltration.
- Botnet Recruitment: Vulnerable devices are prime targets for Mirai-like botnets (e.g., Mozi, Gafgyt).
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
-
Firmware Update:
- Apply the latest firmware patch from Tenda’s official website (if available).
- Monitor for vendor advisories (Tenda has historically been slow to patch critical flaws).
-
Network-Level Protections:
- Disable remote administration (WAN-side access) to reduce attack surface.
- Segment the router from critical internal networks (VLAN isolation).
- Deploy a WAF (Web Application Firewall) to filter malicious HTTP requests.
-
Exploitation Prevention:
- Disable MAC filtering if not in use (reduces exposure).
- Implement rate limiting on the
/goform/addWifiMacFilterendpoint to prevent brute-force attacks.
Long-Term Mitigations
-
Replace End-of-Life (EOL) Devices:
- If Tenda does not release a patch, migrate to a supported router with active security updates.
-
Enhanced Monitoring:
- Deploy IDS/IPS (e.g., Snort, Suricata) to detect exploitation attempts.
- Log and alert on unusual HTTP POST requests to
/goform/addWifiMacFilter.
-
Hardening Measures:
- Disable unnecessary services (UPnP, Telnet, FTP).
- Change default credentials and enforce strong passwords.
- Enable HTTPS for administrative access to prevent credential sniffing.
-
Threat Intelligence Integration:
- Subscribe to CISA advisories and vendor bulletins for emerging threats.
- Monitor dark web forums for exploit chatter related to Tenda devices.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
IoT Security Crisis:
- This vulnerability highlights the persistent insecurity of consumer-grade routers, which are frequently targeted due to:
- Lack of automatic updates.
- Weak default configurations.
- Minimal security testing in firmware development.
- This vulnerability highlights the persistent insecurity of consumer-grade routers, which are frequently targeted due to:
-
Botnet & DDoS Threats:
- Unpatched Tenda routers are high-value targets for botnet operators (e.g., Mirai variants).
- Exploited devices can be used for:
- DDoS amplification attacks.
- Cryptojacking.
- Proxy networks for anonymizing malicious traffic.
-
Supply Chain Risks:
- Many ISPs and small businesses OEM Tenda routers, increasing the risk of supply chain compromise.
- A single vulnerable device can serve as an entry point for lateral movement in enterprise networks.
-
Regulatory & Compliance Concerns:
- Organizations using unpatched Tenda routers may violate:
- NIST SP 800-53 (Risk Management Framework).
- ISO 27001 (Information Security Management).
- GDPR (if personal data is exposed via compromised routers).
- Organizations using unpatched Tenda routers may violate:
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
- Vulnerable Function:
addWifiMacFilterin/bin/httpd(Tenda’s custom web server). - Flaw: The
deviceIdparameter is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without length validation. - Assembly Snippet (Hypothetical):
char stack_buffer[64]; // Fixed-size buffer strcpy(stack_buffer, deviceId); // Unsafe copy (no bounds checking) - Exploitation Primitive:
- EIP/RIP Control: Overwriting the return address on the stack.
- Shellcode Execution: If the stack is executable, arbitrary code runs in the context of the
httpdprocess (typically root).
Exploit Development Considerations
-
Stack Layout Analysis:
- Use GDB or Ghidra to analyze the binary and determine:
- Buffer size (likely 64-128 bytes).
- Offset to return address (e.g., 72 bytes).
- Bad characters (e.g.,
\x00,\x20for HTTP).
- Use GDB or Ghidra to analyze the binary and determine:
-
Payload Construction:
- Linux MIPS/ARM Shellcode: Tenda routers typically run on MIPS or ARM architectures.
- Reverse Shell Example (MIPS):
shellcode = ( "\x24\x0f\xff\xfa" # li $t7, -6 "\x01\xe0\x78\x27" # nor $t7, $t7, $zero "\x21\xe4\xff\xfd" # addi $a0, $t7, -3 "\x21\xe5\xff\xfd" # addi $a1, $t7, -3 "\x28\x06\xff\xff" # slti $a2, $zero, -1 "\x24\x02\x10\x57" # li $v0, 4183 (sys_execve) "\x01\x01\x01\x0c" # syscall 0x40404 ) - ROP Chains (if NX is enabled): Use gadgets from
libcor thehttpdbinary.
-
Bypass Techniques:
- ASLR Bypass: Leak memory addresses via information disclosure (e.g.,
/proc/self/maps). - Stack Canaries: If present, brute-force or leak the canary value.
- DEP Bypass: Use Return-to-libc or ROP if the stack is non-executable.
- ASLR Bypass: Leak memory addresses via information disclosure (e.g.,
Detection & Forensics
-
Network-Based Detection:
- Snort/Suricata Rule:
alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 80 (msg:"Tenda FH1203 Stack Overflow Attempt"; flow:to_server,established; content:"POST /goform/addWifiMacFilter"; content:"deviceId="; pcre:"/deviceId=[^\x26]{500,}/"; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
- Snort/Suricata Rule:
-
Log Analysis:
- Check for unusually long
deviceIdparameters in HTTP logs. - Look for crash reports in
/var/log/messagesordmesg.
- Check for unusually long
-
Memory Forensics:
- Use Volatility or LiME to analyze a memory dump for:
- Shellcode execution traces.
- ROP chain artifacts.
- Malicious process injection.
- Use Volatility or LiME to analyze a memory dump for:
Conclusion
CVE-2023-37701 represents a critical, remotely exploitable vulnerability in Tenda FH1203 routers, enabling unauthenticated arbitrary code execution. Given the low attack complexity and high impact, organizations and consumers using this device must apply patches immediately or implement compensating controls to mitigate risk.
Security teams should monitor for exploitation attempts, harden network perimeters, and consider replacing unsupported devices to prevent long-term exposure. The broader implications of this vulnerability underscore the urgent need for improved IoT security standards and vendor accountability in firmware development.
For further research, security professionals are encouraged to:
- Reverse-engineer the firmware to identify additional vulnerabilities.
- Develop custom detection rules for enterprise environments.
- Engage with the security community to share threat intelligence on Tenda exploits.