CVE-2023-37718
CVE-2023-37718
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
Tenda F1202 V1.0BR_V1.2.0.20(408), FH1202_V1.2.0.19_EN were discovered to contain a stack overflow in the page parameter in the function fromSafeClientFilter.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-37718
CVE ID: CVE-2023-37718 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Affected Products: Tenda F1202 (V1.0BR_V1.2.0.20(408)), FH1202 (V1.2.0.19_EN) Vulnerability Type: Stack-Based Buffer Overflow
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2023-37718 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Tenda’s fromSafeClientFilter function, specifically in the page parameter. The flaw arises due to improper bounds checking when processing user-supplied input, allowing an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory structures on the stack.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8 - Critical)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely over the network without authentication. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No specialized conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None (N) | No privileges needed; unauthenticated exploitation. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged (U) | Impact is confined to the vulnerable component. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High (H) | Successful exploitation can lead to arbitrary code execution (ACE), allowing full system compromise. |
| Integrity (I) | High (H) | Attacker can modify memory, execute arbitrary commands, or install malware. |
| Availability (A) | High (H) | Exploitation can crash the device or render it unresponsive. |
Resulting CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (9.8 Critical)
Exploitability Factors
- Remote Exploitability: Yes (no physical access required).
- Authentication Bypass: Not required.
- Exploit Code Maturity: Publicly available (PoC exploits exist).
- Weaponization Potential: High (can be integrated into botnets, ransomware, or APT campaigns).
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors
-
Remote Network Exploitation
- An attacker sends a maliciously crafted HTTP request to the vulnerable Tenda router’s web interface.
- The
pageparameter in thefromSafeClientFilterfunction is manipulated to trigger the overflow.
-
Local Network Exploitation
- If the router’s admin interface is exposed to the LAN (common in SOHO environments), an attacker on the same network can exploit the flaw.
-
WAN Exploitation (If Admin Interface is Internet-Facing)
- If the router’s web interface is exposed to the internet (e.g., misconfigured port forwarding), remote attackers can exploit it without prior access.
Exploitation Methodology
-
Fuzzing & Input Crafting
- The attacker identifies the vulnerable
pageparameter by analyzing HTTP requests to the router’s web server. - A long string (e.g., 1000+ bytes) is sent to overflow the stack buffer.
- The attacker identifies the vulnerable
-
Stack Smashing & ROP Chain Execution
- The overflow corrupts the return address on the stack, allowing the attacker to redirect execution to malicious shellcode.
- Return-Oriented Programming (ROP) techniques may be used to bypass NX (No-Execute) bit protections if enabled.
-
Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE)
- Successful exploitation grants the attacker root-level access to the router.
- Possible actions:
- Firmware modification (backdoor installation).
- DNS hijacking (pharming attacks).
- Botnet recruitment (Mirai-like infections).
- Lateral movement into the internal network.
-
Denial-of-Service (DoS)
- If ACE is not achieved, the overflow may still crash the device, leading to a reboot loop or persistent DoS.
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Analysis
- The referenced GitHub report likely contains:
- A Python/Metasploit exploit demonstrating the overflow.
- Payload construction details (e.g.,
cyclicpattern for offset calculation). - ROP gadget identification for ARM/MIPS architectures (common in Tenda routers).
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Products
| Product | Firmware Version | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Tenda F1202 | V1.0BR_V1.2.0.20(408) | Confirmed Vulnerable |
| Tenda FH1202 | V1.2.0.19_EN | Confirmed Vulnerable |
Potential Additional Affected Models
- Other Tenda routers using the same HTTP server binary (e.g., F1203, FH1203) may also be vulnerable if they share the
fromSafeClientFilterfunction. - Firmware analysis (via Binwalk, Ghidra, or IDA Pro) is recommended to confirm.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
-
Apply Vendor Patches
- Check Tenda’s official website for firmware updates.
- If no patch is available, disable remote administration and restrict access to the web interface.
-
Network-Level Protections
- Firewall Rules: Block external access to the router’s admin interface (TCP/80, TCP/443).
- VLAN Segmentation: Isolate IoT devices (including routers) from critical internal networks.
- Intrusion Prevention System (IPS): Deploy signatures to detect and block exploit attempts (e.g., Snort/Suricata rules for
pageparameter overflows).
-
Disable Unnecessary Services
- Disable UPnP (Universal Plug and Play) if not required.
- Disable WAN-side administration unless absolutely necessary.
Long-Term Mitigations
-
Firmware Hardening
- Stack Canaries: Enable if supported by the firmware.
- ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization): If the device supports it, enable to hinder ROP attacks.
- NX Bit (No-Execute): Ensure executable space protection is enabled.
-
Regular Vulnerability Scanning
- Use tools like OpenVAS, Nessus, or Nuclei to scan for IoT vulnerabilities.
- Monitor CISA KEV (Known Exploited Vulnerabilities) for updates.
-
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
- Implement software-defined perimeters (SDP) to restrict access to router management interfaces.
-
Firmware Analysis & Reverse Engineering
- Security teams should reverse-engineer the firmware to identify other potential vulnerabilities.
- Use Ghidra/IDA Pro to analyze the
fromSafeClientFilterfunction for additional flaws.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
IoT Security Crisis
- This vulnerability is part of a growing trend of critical flaws in SOHO routers, which are often poorly secured and rarely updated.
- Similar vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2021-4045, CVE-2022-42475) have been exploited in botnets (Mirai, Mozi) and APT campaigns.
-
Supply Chain Risks
- Tenda routers are widely used in home and small business environments, making them attractive targets for cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors.
- Exploited routers can serve as pivot points for lateral movement into corporate networks.
-
Regulatory & Compliance Concerns
- Organizations using vulnerable Tenda routers may violate NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, or GDPR if proper mitigations are not applied.
- CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01 mandates federal agencies to patch known exploited vulnerabilities within strict timelines.
-
Exploit Availability & Weaponization
- Public PoCs increase the risk of mass exploitation by script kiddies, ransomware groups, and APTs.
- Exploit-as-a-Service (EaaS) models may emerge, lowering the barrier for less skilled attackers.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
-
Vulnerable Function:
fromSafeClientFilter- Located in the HTTP server binary (
httpdor similar). - The
pageparameter is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without proper length validation.
- Located in the HTTP server binary (
-
Stack Layout & Overflow Mechanics
- Buffer Size: Likely 256-512 bytes (common in embedded systems).
- Overflow Impact: Corrupts the saved return address, allowing arbitrary code execution.
- Architecture: Likely ARM or MIPS (common in Tenda routers).
-
Exploit Development Steps
- Step 1: Crash the Service
import requests url = "http://<ROUTER_IP>/goform/fromSafeClientFilter" payload = "page=" + "A" * 1000 requests.post(url, data=payload) - Step 2: Determine Offset
- Use a cyclic pattern (e.g.,
cyclic 1000) to find the exact offset where the return address is overwritten.
- Use a cyclic pattern (e.g.,
- Step 3: Craft ROP Chain
- Identify ROP gadgets (e.g.,
pop r0; ret) to bypass ASLR/NX.
- Identify ROP gadgets (e.g.,
- Step 4: Deploy Shellcode
- Use MIPS/ARM shellcode to spawn a reverse shell or install a backdoor.
- Step 1: Crash the Service
-
Firmware Analysis (Ghidra/IDA Pro)
- Decompile
fromSafeClientFilterto confirm the vulnerable code path. - Check for mitigations (stack canaries, ASLR, NX).
- Extract and analyze the HTTP server binary for additional flaws.
- Decompile
Detection & Forensics
-
Network-Based Detection
- Snort/Suricata Rule:
alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 80 (msg:"Tenda Router Stack Overflow Attempt (CVE-2023-37718)"; flow:to_server,established; content:"page="; pcre:"/page=[^\x00]{500,}/"; reference:cve,2023-37718; classtype:attempted-admin; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
- Snort/Suricata Rule:
-
Log Analysis
- Check router logs for unusually long
pageparameters in HTTP requests. - Look for crash logs or unexpected reboots.
- Check router logs for unusually long
-
Memory Forensics (If Possible)
- Dump router memory (if supported) to analyze stack corruption.
- Check for unexpected processes (e.g., reverse shells, malware).
Conclusion & Recommendations
CVE-2023-37718 represents a critical, remotely exploitable vulnerability in widely deployed Tenda routers. Given the public availability of PoCs and the high CVSS score, organizations and individuals using affected devices must act immediately to mitigate risks.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams
✅ Patch immediately if a firmware update is available. ✅ Isolate vulnerable devices from critical networks. ✅ Monitor for exploitation attempts using IDS/IPS. ✅ Conduct firmware analysis to identify additional vulnerabilities. ✅ Assume compromise if exploitation is detected and perform incident response.
Final Risk Assessment
| Factor | Risk Level | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Exploitability | High | Remote, unauthenticated, PoC available. |
| Impact | Critical | Full system compromise possible. |
| Likelihood of Exploitation | High | Publicly disclosed, weaponized in the wild. |
| Mitigation Feasibility | Medium | Patching may not be available; network controls required. |
Recommendation: Treat this vulnerability as an imminent threat and prioritize remediation efforts accordingly.