CVE-2023-38934
CVE-2023-38934
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
Tenda F1203 V2.0.1.6, FH1203 V2.0.1.6 and FH1205 V2.0.0.7(775) was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the deviceId parameter in the formSetDeviceName function.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-38934
CVE ID: CVE-2023-38934 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Affected Products: Tenda F1203 (V2.0.1.6), FH1203 (V2.0.1.6), FH1205 (V2.0.0.7(775))
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Type
CVE-2023-38934 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Tenda router firmware, specifically within the formSetDeviceName function. The flaw arises due to improper bounds checking when processing the deviceId parameter, allowing an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory structures on the stack.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8 - Critical)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
- Attack Vector (AV:N) – Network-exploitable (remote attack surface).
- Attack Complexity (AC:L) – Low (no special conditions required).
- Privileges Required (PR:N) – None (unauthenticated exploitation).
- User Interaction (UI:N) – None (fully automated exploitation).
- Scope (S:U) – Unchanged (impact confined to the vulnerable component).
- Confidentiality (C:H) – High (arbitrary code execution possible).
- Integrity (I:H) – High (malicious code execution).
- Availability (A:H) – High (device crash or persistent compromise).
The critical severity stems from:
- Remote exploitability without authentication.
- Potential for arbitrary code execution (ACE) with root privileges.
- High impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA triad).
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Mechanism
-
Input Crafting:
- The
formSetDeviceNamefunction processes thedeviceIdparameter without proper length validation. - An attacker sends a maliciously crafted HTTP request with an oversized
deviceIdvalue (e.g., >256 bytes), triggering a stack overflow.
- The
-
Stack Corruption:
- The overflow overwrites the return address on the stack, allowing control over the instruction pointer (EIP/RIP).
- If ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization) and stack canaries are absent (common in embedded devices), exploitation is trivial.
-
Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE):
- The attacker can inject shellcode (e.g., reverse shell, firmware modification) into the payload.
- Successful exploitation grants root-level access to the router.
Attack Vectors
| Vector | Description |
|---|---|
| Remote Exploitation | Unauthenticated attackers on the same network (LAN/WAN) can trigger the flaw. |
| CSRF-Based Attacks | If the router’s web interface lacks CSRF protection, attackers can trick users into sending malicious requests. |
| Botnet Recruitment | Compromised devices can be enslaved in Mirai-like botnets for DDoS or lateral movement. |
| Persistent Backdoors | Attackers may implant firmware-level malware for long-term access. |
Exploitation Requirements
- Network Access: Attacker must be on the same network (LAN) or have WAN access if remote administration is enabled.
- No Authentication: Exploitable without credentials.
- Minimal Complexity: Publicly available PoC exploits exist (see References).
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Products
| Model | Firmware Version | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Tenda F1203 | V2.0.1.6 | Confirmed |
| Tenda FH1203 | V2.0.1.6 | Confirmed |
| Tenda FH1205 | V2.0.0.7(775) | Confirmed |
Likely Affected Components
- Web Interface (HTTP/HTTPS): The vulnerability resides in the router’s web management interface.
- Firmware Binary: The
formSetDeviceNamefunction is part of the Tenda firmware’s CGI handler.
Unaffected Versions
- Unknown: No official patches or fixed versions have been disclosed as of this analysis.
- Workarounds: See Mitigation Strategies below.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
| Mitigation | Description |
|---|---|
| Disable Remote Administration | Restrict web interface access to LAN-only (disable WAN access). |
| Network Segmentation | Isolate IoT devices (e.g., Tenda routers) in a separate VLAN. |
| Firewall Rules | Block inbound HTTP/HTTPS traffic to the router from untrusted networks. |
| Disable Unused Services | Turn off UPnP, Telnet, SSH if not required. |
| Firmware Monitoring | Check for vendor updates regularly (Tenda’s support page). |
Long-Term Remediation
-
Apply Vendor Patches:
- Monitor Tenda’s official website for firmware updates addressing CVE-2023-38934.
- If no patch is available, consider replacing the device with a supported model.
-
Network-Level Protections:
- Deploy Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) to detect and block exploit attempts.
- Use Snort/Suricata rules to detect malicious
deviceIdpayloads.
-
Hardening Measures:
- Change default credentials (admin/admin is common in Tenda devices).
- Disable unnecessary ports (e.g., 80, 443, 23, 22) on the WAN interface.
- Enable logging and monitor for suspicious activity.
-
Alternative Firmware:
- If supported, consider OpenWRT/DD-WRT for better security controls.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
IoT Security Crisis:
- This vulnerability is part of a growing trend of critical flaws in consumer-grade routers, which are often poorly maintained and rarely patched.
- Similar vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2021-41653, CVE-2022-42458) have led to large-scale botnet infections (e.g., Mirai, Mozi).
-
Supply Chain Risks:
- Tenda routers are widely used in SOHO (Small Office/Home Office) environments, making them attractive targets for APT groups and cybercriminals.
- Compromised routers can be used for:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks (e.g., DNS hijacking).
- Lateral movement into corporate networks.
- Cryptojacking (mining malware).
-
Regulatory and Compliance Concerns:
- Organizations using affected devices may violate NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, or GDPR if proper mitigations are not applied.
- CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog may list this CVE, requiring federal agencies to patch or mitigate.
-
Exploit Availability:
- Public Proof-of-Concept (PoC) exploits are available (see References), lowering the barrier for script kiddies and automated attacks.
- Metasploit modules may emerge, further increasing exploitation risk.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
- Vulnerable Function:
formSetDeviceName(located in/bin/httpdor similar CGI binary). - Flaw: The function uses unsafe string operations (e.g.,
strcpy,sprintf) without bounds checking on thedeviceIdparameter. - Stack Layout:
[Buffer (e.g., 256 bytes)] [Saved EBP] [Return Address] [Function Arguments]- An oversized
deviceIdoverwrites the return address, enabling EIP control.
- An oversized
Exploitation Steps (PoC)
-
Identify Target:
- Send a GET/POST request to
/goform/formSetDeviceNamewith a longdeviceId. - Example:
POST /goform/formSetDeviceName HTTP/1.1 Host: 192.168.0.1 Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded Content-Length: [calculated] deviceId=[A*500]&deviceName=test
- Send a GET/POST request to
-
Crash Analysis:
- If the device crashes (e.g., SIGSEGV), the overflow is confirmed.
- Use GDB or Firmware Analysis Toolkit (FAT) to debug.
-
Shellcode Injection:
- Replace the
A’s with a ROP chain or shellcode (e.g., MIPS/ARM payload for embedded devices). - Example (MIPS):
payload = "A" * 264 + p32(0xdeadbeef) + "\x24\x0f\xff\xfa" + ... # Shellcode
- Replace the
-
Post-Exploitation:
- Gain root shell via reverse shell or firmware modification.
- Persist via cron jobs, startup scripts, or firmware backdoors.
Detection and Forensics
- Network Signatures:
- Snort Rule:
alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 80 (msg:"Tenda Router Stack Overflow Attempt"; flow:to_server,established; content:"deviceId="; pcre:"/deviceId=[^\x26]{256,}/"; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
- Snort Rule:
- Log Analysis:
- Check for unusually long
deviceIdvalues in HTTP logs. - Look for crash reports in
/var/log/(if logging is enabled).
- Check for unusually long
Reverse Engineering Notes
- Firmware Extraction:
- Use binwalk to extract the firmware:
binwalk -e F1203_V2.0.1.6.bin
- Use binwalk to extract the firmware:
- Binary Analysis:
- Locate
formSetDeviceNamein Ghidra/IDA Pro. - Identify unsafe functions (
strcpy,sprintf,gets).
- Locate
- Patch Diffing:
- Compare vulnerable and patched firmware to identify fixes.
Conclusion
CVE-2023-38934 represents a critical, remotely exploitable vulnerability in Tenda routers, posing significant risks to home and small business networks. Given the public availability of exploits and the lack of immediate patches, organizations and individuals must implement mitigations immediately to prevent compromise.
Security teams should:
- Isolate vulnerable devices from critical networks.
- Monitor for exploitation attempts using IDS/IPS.
- Prepare for firmware updates once available.
- Consider replacing unsupported devices if long-term security is a concern.
This vulnerability underscores the urgent need for better IoT security standards, including automated patching, secure coding practices, and vendor accountability.
References: