CVE-2023-40260
CVE-2023-40260
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Description
EmpowerID before 7.205.0.1 allows an attacker to bypass an MFA (multi factor authentication) requirement if the first factor (username and password) is known, because the first factor is sufficient to change an account's email address, and the product would then send MFA codes to the new email address (which may be attacker-controlled). NOTE: this is different from CVE-2023-4177, which claims to be about "some unknown processing of the component Multi-Factor Authentication Code Handler" and thus cannot be correlated with other vulnerability information.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-40260
CVE ID: CVE-2023-40260 CVSS Score: 9.1 (Critical) Affected Software: EmpowerID (versions before 7.205.0.1) Vulnerability Type: Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Bypass
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2023-40260 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in EmpowerID, an Identity and Access Management (IAM) solution. The flaw allows an attacker to circumvent MFA requirements by exploiting a logical flaw in the email-based MFA workflow.
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability stems from improper session validation and insufficient MFA enforcement during email modification. Specifically:
- The system does not require MFA re-authentication when a user changes their registered email address.
- Once the email is updated, MFA codes are sent to the new (attacker-controlled) email, allowing the attacker to intercept them.
- The attacker only needs valid first-factor credentials (username/password) to initiate the attack.
CVSS 9.1 (Critical) Breakdown
| Metric | Score | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely via web interface. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No specialized conditions required. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | Low (L) | Only requires valid credentials (no admin access). |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | No victim interaction needed. |
| Scope (S) | Changed (C) | Affects security boundaries (MFA bypass). |
| Confidentiality (C) | High (H) | Full account takeover possible. |
| Integrity (I) | High (H) | Unauthorized access to sensitive data. |
| Availability (A) | None (N) | No direct impact on system availability. |
Temporal Score (if applicable):
- Exploit Code Maturity (E): Functional (PoC likely available).
- Remediation Level (RL): Official Fix (patch available in 7.205.0.1).
- Report Confidence (RC): Confirmed (vendor acknowledgment).
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Workflow
- Initial Access:
- Attacker obtains valid credentials (via phishing, credential stuffing, or leaked databases).
- Email Modification:
- Attacker logs in with only the first factor (username/password).
- Navigates to the account settings and changes the registered email to an attacker-controlled address.
- MFA Bypass:
- The system does not require MFA re-authentication for email changes.
- The MFA code is sent to the new email, which the attacker controls.
- Account Takeover:
- Attacker intercepts the MFA code and completes authentication, gaining full access.
Attack Scenarios
- Targeted Phishing + Credential Theft:
- Attacker phishes a user to obtain credentials, then exploits this flaw to bypass MFA.
- Insider Threat:
- A malicious insider with basic access modifies their email to intercept MFA codes.
- Automated Credential Stuffing:
- Attackers use leaked credentials to test for vulnerable EmpowerID instances.
Exploitation Difficulty
- Low to Medium (depends on credential availability).
- No advanced technical skills required; basic web application manipulation suffices.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Versions
- EmpowerID versions before 7.205.0.1 are affected.
- Confirmed vulnerable deployments:
- On-premises installations.
- Cloud-based instances (if not patched).
Unaffected Versions
- EmpowerID 7.205.0.1 and later (patched).
- Other IAM solutions (not directly affected, but similar flaws may exist).
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
- Apply the Patch (Critical):
- Upgrade to EmpowerID 7.205.0.1 or later immediately.
- Temporary Workarounds (if patching is delayed):
- Disable email-based MFA and enforce TOTP (Time-based OTP) or hardware tokens.
- Restrict email modification to require MFA re-authentication.
- Monitor for suspicious email changes (SIEM alerts for unusual modifications).
Long-Term Security Enhancements
- Enforce MFA for All Sensitive Actions:
- Require MFA before allowing email changes or other high-risk modifications.
- Implement Rate Limiting:
- Prevent brute-force attacks on email modification endpoints.
- Enhance Session Management:
- Invalidate sessions after email changes and require re-authentication.
- Deploy Behavioral Analytics:
- Use UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analytics) to detect anomalous email changes.
- Conduct Security Audits:
- Review IAM policies to ensure MFA is enforced for all critical operations.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
- Increased Risk of Account Takeovers:
- Attackers can bypass MFA, a critical security control, leading to data breaches and lateral movement.
- Supply Chain and Third-Party Risks:
- Organizations using EmpowerID may expose partner or customer accounts if MFA is bypassed.
- Regulatory and Compliance Violations:
- Failure to enforce MFA may violate GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, or NIST guidelines.
- Erosion of Trust in MFA Solutions:
- Highlights that MFA is not foolproof and must be properly implemented.
Comparison with Similar Vulnerabilities
| CVE | Vulnerability Type | CVSS Score | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-40260 | MFA Bypass via Email Modification | 9.1 | Exploits logical flaw in email-based MFA. |
| CVE-2023-4177 | MFA Code Handler Issue | (Not specified) | Unknown processing flaw (no correlation). |
| CVE-2022-30190 (Follina) | MSDT RCE via Office | 7.8 | Different attack vector (RCE vs. MFA bypass). |
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Mechanics
- Endpoint Exploitation:
- The flaw likely resides in the
/Account/ChangeEmailor similar API endpoint. - Session validation is missing, allowing email changes without MFA re-authentication.
- The flaw likely resides in the
- MFA Code Delivery:
- After email modification, the system automatically sends an MFA code to the new address.
- No additional verification is required before sending the code.
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Considerations
While no public PoC is confirmed, security researchers could:
- Intercept HTTP Requests:
- Use Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP to modify email change requests.
- Test Session Handling:
- Verify if session tokens remain valid after email changes.
- Check MFA Enforcement:
- Attempt to bypass MFA by changing the email before completing authentication.
Detection and Monitoring
- SIEM Rules for Suspicious Activity:
- Alert on multiple email changes in a short timeframe.
- Monitor for MFA code requests to unusual email domains.
- Log Analysis:
- Review authentication logs for successful logins without MFA completion.
- Check for email modifications followed by immediate MFA code requests.
Forensic Investigation Steps
- Identify Compromised Accounts:
- Check for unusual email changes in user profiles.
- Review Authentication Logs:
- Look for logins with only first-factor authentication followed by MFA code requests.
- Analyze MFA Code Delivery:
- Determine if MFA codes were sent to attacker-controlled emails.
- Check for Lateral Movement:
- Investigate if compromised accounts accessed sensitive data.
Conclusion
CVE-2023-40260 represents a critical MFA bypass vulnerability in EmpowerID, allowing attackers to compromise accounts with only first-factor credentials. The flaw underscores the importance of proper MFA enforcement and session management in IAM solutions.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams: ✅ Patch immediately (EmpowerID 7.205.0.1 or later). ✅ Enforce MFA for all sensitive actions, including email changes. ✅ Monitor for suspicious email modifications and MFA code requests. ✅ Conduct a security audit to ensure no accounts were compromised.
This vulnerability serves as a reminder that MFA is not a silver bullet—implementation flaws can render it ineffective. Organizations must continuously assess their IAM security posture to prevent such bypasses.
References: