CVE-2023-47104
CVE-2023-47104
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
tinyfiledialogs (aka tiny file dialogs) before 3.15.0 allows shell metacharacters (such as a backquote or a dollar sign) in titles, messages, and other input data. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-36767, which only considered single and double quote characters.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2023-47104
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2023-47104 CVSS Score: 9.8
The vulnerability in tinyfiledialogs (aka tiny file dialogs) before version 3.15.0 allows shell metacharacters (such as a backquote or a dollar sign) in titles, messages, and other input data. This issue arises from an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-36767, which only addressed single and double quote characters. The high CVSS score of 9.8 indicates a critical vulnerability that could be exploited to execute arbitrary commands on the affected system.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Command Injection: An attacker could inject shell metacharacters into titles, messages, or other input fields to execute arbitrary commands on the host system.
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): If the application processes user input without proper sanitization, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute malicious code remotely.
Exploitation Methods:
- Crafted Input: An attacker could craft input strings containing shell metacharacters to manipulate the command execution flow.
- Social Engineering: Attackers might use social engineering techniques to trick users into entering malicious input that exploits the vulnerability.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- tinyfiledialogs before version 3.15.0
Affected Systems:
- Any system running applications that use tinyfiledialogs before version 3.15.0. This includes various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Upgrade: Upgrade to tinyfiledialogs version 3.15.0 or later, which includes the necessary fixes for this vulnerability.
- Input Sanitization: Ensure that all input fields are properly sanitized to remove or escape shell metacharacters.
- Least Privilege: Run applications with the least privilege necessary to minimize the impact of potential exploits.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Regular Patching: Implement a regular patching and update schedule for all software components.
- Security Training: Conduct regular security training for developers and users to recognize and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
- Code Review: Perform thorough code reviews to identify and fix similar issues in other parts of the application.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
The discovery of CVE-2023-47104 highlights the importance of comprehensive input validation and the risks associated with incomplete fixes for known vulnerabilities. This vulnerability underscores the need for continuous monitoring and updating of software dependencies. Organizations must prioritize security audits and code reviews to ensure that all potential attack vectors are addressed.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- Root Cause: The vulnerability stems from the incomplete fix for CVE-2020-36767, which did not address shell metacharacters like backquotes and dollar signs.
- Exploitability: The vulnerability can be exploited by injecting shell metacharacters into input fields, leading to command injection and potential remote code execution.
Detection and Response:
- Monitoring: Implement monitoring for unusual command execution patterns and anomalous behavior in applications using tinyfiledialogs.
- Incident Response: Develop an incident response plan that includes steps for identifying, containing, and remediating command injection attacks.
Code Example:
// Example of vulnerable code
char command[256];
sprintf(command, "echo %s", user_input);
system(command);
// Fixed code with proper input sanitization
char sanitized_input[256];
sanitize_input(user_input, sanitized_input);
sprintf(command, "echo %s", sanitized_input);
system(command);
References:
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and comprehensively, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of command injection and remote code execution attacks, thereby enhancing their overall cybersecurity posture.