CVE-2024-32017
CVE-2024-32017
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the `gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()` function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent `strcpy()`. In detail, the length of the `_uri` string is checked instead of the length of the `_proxy` string. The `_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()` function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the `cep->req_etag` buffer that is `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX` bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that `optlen` becomes larger than `COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX`, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2024-32017
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2024-32017
CVSS Score: 9.8
Severity: Critical
Description: The vulnerability involves buffer overflow issues in the RIOT operating system, specifically within the gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get() and _gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options() functions. The primary issue is a typo in the size check and the lack of explicit size checking before copying data, which can lead to buffer overflows.
Impact: The potential impact ranges from denial of service (DoS) to arbitrary code execution, depending on the attacker's ability to control the input and cross security boundaries.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Network-Based Attacks: An attacker could send crafted network packets to exploit the buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the
gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()and_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()functions. - Local Exploitation: If an attacker has local access to the system, they could manipulate the input to these functions to trigger the buffer overflow.
Exploitation Methods:
- Crafted Input: An attacker could craft input such that the
optlenparameter becomes larger thanCOAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX, leading to a buffer overflow. - Memory Corruption: By exploiting the buffer overflow, an attacker could corrupt memory, leading to arbitrary code execution or system crashes.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Systems:
- Devices running the RIOT operating system, particularly those using the
gcoapmodule for DNS and forward proxy functionalities.
Software Versions:
- The vulnerability affects all versions of RIOT OS that include the
gcoapmodule with the flawedgcoap_dns_server_proxy_get()and_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options()functions.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Manual Bounds Checking: Users are advised to implement manual bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows. This can be done by ensuring that the length of the
_proxystring is checked correctly and that explicit size checks are added before copying data.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Patch Deployment: Await and apply the official patch from the RIOT OS maintainers once it becomes available.
- Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review of the
gcoapmodule to identify and fix similar vulnerabilities. - Input Validation: Implement robust input validation mechanisms to ensure that all inputs are within expected bounds.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Immediate Impact:
- Increased Risk: Devices running RIOT OS are at increased risk of DoS attacks and arbitrary code execution, which could compromise the integrity and availability of IoT devices.
Long-Term Impact:
- Trust in IoT Security: This vulnerability highlights the need for rigorous security practices in IoT operating systems, which are often deployed in critical infrastructure.
- Patch Management: Emphasizes the importance of timely patch management and continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities in IoT devices.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerable Functions:
gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get(): The size check for the_uristring is incorrectly implemented, leading to a buffer overflow in the subsequentstrcpy()operation._gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options(): Lacks explicit size checking before copying data to thecep->req_etagbuffer, which isCOAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAXbytes long.
Code Snippets:
- Vulnerable Code in
gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get():if (strlen(_uri) < MAX_URI_LENGTH) { strcpy(buffer, _proxy); // Buffer overflow if _proxy is longer than buffer } - Vulnerable Code in
_gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options():memcpy(cep->req_etag, opt, optlen); // No size check before copying
Mitigation Code:
- Corrected Size Check:
if (strlen(_proxy) < MAX_URI_LENGTH) { strcpy(buffer, _proxy); } - Explicit Size Check:
if (optlen <= COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX) { memcpy(cep->req_etag, opt, optlen); }
References:
By addressing these vulnerabilities promptly and thoroughly, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with CVE-2024-32017 and enhance the overall security posture of their IoT deployments.