CVE-2024-45159
CVE-2024-45159
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1. With TLS 1.3, when a server enables optional authentication of the client, if the client-provided certificate does not have appropriate values in if keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions, then the return value of mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() would incorrectly have the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits clear. As a result, an attacker that had a certificate valid for uses other than TLS client authentication would nonetheless be able to use it for TLS client authentication. Only TLS 1.3 servers were affected, and only with optional authentication (with required authentication, the handshake would be aborted with a fatal alert).
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2024-45159
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2024-45159 CVSS Score: 9.8
The vulnerability in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1 involves a flaw in the certificate verification process during TLS 1.3 handshakes with optional client authentication. Specifically, the mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() function fails to correctly set the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits when the client-provided certificate lacks appropriate values in the keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions. This allows an attacker to use a certificate valid for other purposes for TLS client authentication.
Severity Evaluation:
- CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical)
- Impact: High
- Exploitability: High
The high CVSS score indicates a critical vulnerability that can be easily exploited, leading to significant security risks.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: An attacker could intercept the TLS handshake and present a certificate valid for other uses, bypassing the intended authentication checks.
- Unauthorized Access: An attacker could authenticate as a legitimate client using a certificate not intended for TLS client authentication, gaining unauthorized access to services.
Exploitation Methods:
- Certificate Misuse: The attacker can use a certificate with valid
keyUsageorextKeyUsageextensions for purposes other than TLS client authentication to bypass the verification process. - Handshake Manipulation: By manipulating the TLS handshake process, the attacker can exploit the flaw in the
mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result()function to gain unauthorized access.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- Mbed TLS versions 3.x before 3.6.1
Affected Systems:
- Any system or application using Mbed TLS for TLS 1.3 handshakes with optional client authentication.
- Servers configured to use Mbed TLS for TLS 1.3 with optional client authentication.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
-
Upgrade Mbed TLS:
- Upgrade to Mbed TLS version 3.6.1 or later, which includes the fix for this vulnerability.
-
Enforce Strict Authentication:
- Configure servers to require client authentication instead of optional authentication to mitigate the risk.
-
Monitor and Audit:
- Implement continuous monitoring and auditing of TLS handshakes to detect any anomalies or unauthorized access attempts.
-
Certificate Management:
- Ensure that certificates used for TLS client authentication have the correct
keyUsageandextKeyUsageextensions.
- Ensure that certificates used for TLS client authentication have the correct
-
Patch Management:
- Implement a robust patch management process to ensure timely updates and patches for all software components, including Mbed TLS.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
The vulnerability highlights the importance of rigorous certificate verification and the potential risks associated with optional client authentication in TLS 1.3. It underscores the need for:
- Strong Certificate Management: Ensuring certificates are used for their intended purposes.
- Robust Patch Management: Timely updates to mitigate vulnerabilities.
- Enhanced Monitoring: Continuous monitoring to detect and respond to potential exploits.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- Function Affected:
mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() - Issue: Incorrect handling of
keyUsageandextKeyUsageextensions in client-provided certificates. - Conditions: Only affects TLS 1.3 servers with optional client authentication.
Detection and Response:
- Log Analysis: Review TLS handshake logs for any anomalies in certificate verification.
- Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): Configure IDS to detect and alert on suspicious TLS handshake activities.
- Incident Response: Develop and implement incident response plans to address potential exploits of this vulnerability.
Code Review:
- Review Certificate Verification Logic: Ensure that the certificate verification logic correctly handles
keyUsageandextKeyUsageextensions. - Test Updates: Thoroughly test updates and patches in a staging environment before deploying them to production.
Conclusion: CVE-2024-45159 is a critical vulnerability that requires immediate attention from cybersecurity professionals. Upgrading to the patched version of Mbed TLS, enforcing strict authentication, and implementing robust monitoring and patch management practices are essential to mitigate the risks associated with this vulnerability.