CVE-2024-51793
CVE-2024-51793
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in Ateeq Rafeeq RepairBuddy computer-repair-shop allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects RepairBuddy: from n/a through <= 3.8115.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2024-51793
CVE ID: CVE-2024-51793 CVSS Score: 10.0 (Critical) Vulnerability Type: Unrestricted File Upload (Arbitrary File Upload Leading to Remote Code Execution - RCE) Affected Software: Webful Creations Computer Repair Shop (WordPress Plugin) – Versions up to and including 3.8115
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2024-51793 is a critical-severity vulnerability in the Computer Repair Shop WordPress plugin, allowing unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files—including web shells—to a vulnerable web server. The flaw stems from insufficient file type validation in the plugin’s file upload functionality, enabling attackers to bypass security controls and execute malicious code remotely.
CVSS v3.1 Vector Breakdown
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| AV | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely over the network. |
| AC | Low (L) | No user interaction or complex conditions required. |
| PR | None (N) | No privileges required; unauthenticated exploitation. |
| UI | None (N) | No user interaction needed. |
| S | Unchanged (U) | Exploit affects only the vulnerable component. |
| C | High (H) | Complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| I | High (H) | Full system integrity compromise possible. |
| A | High (H) | Full system availability compromise possible. |
Resulting Score: 10.0 (Critical) – This is a worst-case scenario vulnerability due to its low attack complexity, unauthenticated nature, and high impact.
Exploitability & Risk Factors
- Zero-Click Exploit: No user interaction or authentication required.
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): Successful exploitation grants full server control.
- Mass Exploitation Potential: High likelihood of automated attacks (e.g., botnets, ransomware).
- Persistence: Attackers can maintain access via web shells or backdoors.
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Workflow
-
Identification of Vulnerable Endpoint
- The plugin exposes an unprotected file upload endpoint (e.g.,
/wp-content/plugins/computer-repair-shop/upload.php). - Attackers can discover this via directory brute-forcing or source code analysis.
- The plugin exposes an unprotected file upload endpoint (e.g.,
-
File Upload Bypass
- The plugin fails to:
- Validate file extensions (e.g.,
.php,.phtml,.phar). - Restrict MIME types (e.g.,
application/x-php). - Implement server-side file content checks.
- Validate file extensions (e.g.,
- Attackers can upload a malicious PHP web shell (e.g.,
shell.php) disguised as an innocuous file (e.g.,.jpgwith PHP code in metadata).
- The plugin fails to:
-
Remote Code Execution (RCE)
- Once uploaded, the attacker accesses the file via:
https://vulnerable-site.com/wp-content/uploads/computer-repair-shop/shell.php - The web shell executes arbitrary commands (e.g.,
system('id'),exec('whoami')). - Post-Exploitation: Attackers may:
- Escalate privileges (if misconfigurations exist).
- Deploy ransomware, cryptominers, or backdoors.
- Exfiltrate sensitive data (e.g., database credentials, PII).
- Once uploaded, the attacker accesses the file via:
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Exploit
A 0-click RCE exploit has been publicly disclosed (GitHub PoC), demonstrating:
- Unauthenticated file upload via a crafted HTTP POST request.
- Automated web shell deployment with command execution.
- Reverse shell establishment for full system control.
Example Exploit Request:
POST /wp-content/plugins/computer-repair-shop/upload.php HTTP/1.1
Host: vulnerable-site.com
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundary
------WebKitFormBoundary
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="shell.php"
Content-Type: application/x-php
<?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>
------WebKitFormBoundary--
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Vulnerable Software
- Product: Computer Repair Shop (WordPress Plugin)
- Vendor: Webful Creations
- Affected Versions: All versions up to and including 3.8115
- Fixed Version: Not yet patched (as of November 11, 2024)
Deployment Context
- WordPress Sites: Any WordPress installation using the vulnerable plugin.
- Hosting Environments: Shared hosting, VPS, or dedicated servers running WordPress.
- Common Use Case: Small-to-medium businesses (SMBs) offering computer repair services.
Detection Methods
- Manual Check:
- Verify plugin version in WordPress admin (
/wp-admin/plugins.php). - Search for
/wp-content/plugins/computer-repair-shop/in web server logs.
- Verify plugin version in WordPress admin (
- Automated Scanning:
- Nmap Script:
http-vuln-cve2024-51793.nse(if available). - Nuclei Template: Custom template to detect the vulnerable endpoint.
- Burp Suite / OWASP ZAP: Intercept file upload requests to test for bypasses.
- Nmap Script:
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions (Temporary Workarounds)
-
Disable the Plugin
- Deactivate Computer Repair Shop until an official patch is released.
- Command:
wp plugin deactivate computer-repair-shop(via WP-CLI).
-
Restrict File Uploads via
.htaccess(Apache)<FilesMatch "\.(php|php5|phtml|phar)$"> Order Deny,Allow Deny from all </FilesMatch> -
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules
- ModSecurity Rule:
SecRule FILES_TMPNAMES "@pmFromFile malicious-extensions.txt" "id:1000,deny,status:403" - Cloudflare / Sucuri: Block requests to
/wp-content/plugins/computer-repair-shop/upload.php.
- ModSecurity Rule:
-
File Upload Restrictions (PHP)
- Modify
php.inito restrict executable file uploads:file_uploads = Off disable_functions = exec, system, passthru, shell_exec
- Modify
Long-Term Remediation
-
Apply Vendor Patch (When Available)
- Monitor Patchstack Advisory for updates.
- Test patches in a staging environment before production deployment.
-
Implement Secure File Upload Controls
- Whitelist allowed file types (e.g.,
.pdf,.jpg). - Rename uploaded files with random hashes (e.g.,
upload_abc123.jpg). - Store uploads outside the web root (e.g.,
/var/uploads/). - Scan files with antivirus (e.g., ClamAV) before processing.
- Whitelist allowed file types (e.g.,
-
Hardening WordPress Security
- Principle of Least Privilege: Restrict plugin permissions.
- Disable PHP Execution in Uploads Directory:
<Directory "/var/www/html/wp-content/uploads"> php_flag engine off </Directory> - Regular Vulnerability Scanning: Use tools like WPScan, Nessus, or OpenVAS.
-
Network-Level Protections
- Segment WordPress Servers: Isolate from internal networks.
- Rate Limiting: Prevent brute-force upload attempts.
- Intrusion Detection/Prevention (IDS/IPS): Monitor for web shell activity.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Exploitation Trends
- Mass Scanning: Threat actors will likely automate exploitation using tools like Nuclei or Metasploit.
- Ransomware & Cryptojacking: Vulnerable sites may be targeted for Monero mining or data exfiltration.
- Supply Chain Risks: Compromised WordPress sites can be used to host phishing pages or malware distribution.
Broader Implications
- SMB Targeting: Small businesses using this plugin are at high risk due to limited security resources.
- WordPress Ecosystem Risks: This vulnerability highlights inadequate security reviews in third-party plugins.
- Regulatory Compliance: Organizations may face GDPR, CCPA, or HIPAA violations if customer data is exposed.
Threat Actor Motivations
| Threat Actor | Likely Exploitation Goal |
|---|---|
| Script Kiddies | Defacement, bragging rights. |
| Cybercriminals | Ransomware, data theft, cryptojacking. |
| APT Groups | Persistent access for espionage. |
| Botnet Operators | Recruitment into DDoS or spam networks. |
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
- Vulnerable Code Snippet (Hypothetical Example):
// Insecure file upload handling in upload.php $target_dir = "uploads/"; $target_file = $target_dir . basename($_FILES["file"]["name"]); move_uploaded_file($_FILES["file"]["tmp_name"], $target_file);- Flaws:
- No file extension validation.
- No MIME type verification.
- No server-side content checks.
- Uploads stored in a web-accessible directory.
- Flaws:
Exploitation Indicators (IOCs)
| Indicator Type | Example |
|---|---|
| File Paths | /wp-content/uploads/computer-repair-shop/shell.php |
| HTTP Requests | POST /wp-content/plugins/computer-repair-shop/upload.php |
| Web Shell Signatures | <?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?> |
| Network Traffic | Outbound connections to attacker-controlled C2 servers. |
Forensic Analysis Steps
- Log Review:
- Check Apache/Nginx access logs for suspicious
POSTrequests to/upload.php. - Look for unusual file extensions (e.g.,
.phpin uploads).
- Check Apache/Nginx access logs for suspicious
- File System Analysis:
- Search for recently modified files in
/wp-content/uploads/. - Use
grepto find PHP backdoors:grep -r "system\|exec\|passthru" /var/www/html/wp-content/uploads/
- Search for recently modified files in
- Memory Forensics:
- Use Volatility or Rekall to detect in-memory web shells.
- Network Forensics:
- Analyze PCAPs for reverse shell connections (e.g.,
nc -lvnp 4444).
- Analyze PCAPs for reverse shell connections (e.g.,
Advanced Mitigation Techniques
- Containerization: Run WordPress in a Docker container with read-only filesystems.
- Immutable Infrastructure: Use AWS Lambda or serverless WordPress to limit attack surface.
- Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP): Deploy tools like Signal Sciences or Cloudflare RASP.
Conclusion & Recommendations
CVE-2024-51793 represents a critical, easily exploitable vulnerability with severe consequences for affected organizations. Given the public PoC and unauthenticated RCE capability, immediate action is required to mitigate risk.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams
✅ Patch Immediately (when available) or disable the plugin. ✅ Implement WAF rules to block malicious uploads. ✅ Monitor for exploitation attempts via logs and IDS. ✅ Conduct a forensic investigation if compromise is suspected. ✅ Educate SMBs on WordPress security best practices.
Final Risk Assessment
| Factor | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Exploitability | High | Public PoC, unauthenticated, low complexity. |
| Impact | Critical | Full system compromise possible. |
| Likelihood of Exploitation | Very High | Mass scanning expected. |
| Remediation Difficulty | Medium | Requires plugin patch or workarounds. |
Action Priority: CRITICAL – IMMEDIATE REMEDIATION REQUIRED
Sources: