CVE-2024-6091
CVE-2024-6091
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
A vulnerability in significant-gravitas/autogpt version 0.5.1 allows an attacker to bypass the shell commands denylist settings. The issue arises when the denylist is configured to block specific commands, such as 'whoami' and '/bin/whoami'. An attacker can circumvent this restriction by executing commands with a modified path, such as '/bin/./whoami', which is not recognized by the denylist.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2024-6091
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2024-6091 CVSS Score: 9.8
The vulnerability in significant-gravitas/autogpt version 0.5.1 allows attackers to bypass the shell commands denylist settings. This is a critical vulnerability due to its high CVSS score of 9.8, indicating a severe risk to systems using the affected software. The vulnerability can lead to unauthorized command execution, potentially resulting in system compromise, data breaches, and further exploitation.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Command Injection: An attacker can inject commands by modifying the path of restricted commands, such as using '/bin/./whoami' instead of '/bin/whoami'.
- Privilege Escalation: If the application runs with elevated privileges, an attacker could escalate their privileges by executing unauthorized commands.
- Data Exfiltration: Attackers can execute commands to exfiltrate sensitive data from the system.
Exploitation Methods:
- Path Manipulation: By manipulating the command path, attackers can bypass the denylist and execute restricted commands.
- Script Injection: Attackers can inject malicious scripts that utilize the vulnerability to execute unauthorized commands.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- significant-gravitas/autogpt version 0.5.1
Affected Systems:
- Any system running the vulnerable version of significant-gravitas/autogpt.
- Systems where the application has access to execute shell commands.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
- Upgrade: Upgrade to a patched version of significant-gravitas/autogpt if available.
- Temporary Workaround: Implement additional command filtering mechanisms to detect and block modified command paths.
Long-Term Solutions:
- Enhanced Denylist: Improve the denylist to include variations of restricted commands.
- Least Privilege: Ensure the application runs with the least privileges necessary.
- Regular Audits: Conduct regular security audits and code reviews to identify and mitigate similar vulnerabilities.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
This vulnerability highlights the importance of robust input validation and command filtering mechanisms. It underscores the need for continuous monitoring and updating of security controls to adapt to evolving attack techniques. The high CVSS score indicates a significant risk, emphasizing the necessity for proactive security measures and timely patch management.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- The vulnerability arises from inadequate command path validation in the denylist configuration.
- Commands with modified paths, such as '/bin/./whoami', are not recognized by the denylist, allowing attackers to bypass restrictions.
Detection and Monitoring:
- Log Analysis: Monitor system logs for unusual command execution patterns.
- Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): Implement IDS rules to detect and alert on suspicious command execution attempts.
Patch Information:
- A patch has been committed to the repository. Refer to the commit ef691359b774a1f9f80cf4f5ace9821967b718ed for details.
References:
Conclusion
CVE-2024-6091 represents a critical vulnerability in significant-gravitas/autogpt version 0.5.1, allowing attackers to bypass command denylist settings. Immediate mitigation strategies include upgrading to a patched version and implementing additional command filtering mechanisms. Long-term solutions involve enhancing the denylist, adhering to the principle of least privilege, and conducting regular security audits. This vulnerability underscores the importance of robust input validation and continuous security monitoring in the cybersecurity landscape.