CVE-2025-0665
CVE-2025-0665
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- High
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
Description
libcurl would wrongly close the same eventfd file descriptor twice when taking down a connection channel after having completed a threaded name resolve.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-0665
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-0665
Description: The vulnerability in libcurl involves the incorrect handling of an eventfd file descriptor, which is closed twice when taking down a connection channel after completing a threaded name resolve. This double-close operation can lead to undefined behavior, potentially causing crashes, data corruption, or other unpredictable outcomes.
CVSS Score: 9.8
Severity Evaluation:
- Criticality: The high CVSS score of 9.8 indicates a critical vulnerability. This score reflects the potential for severe impacts, including system crashes and data corruption.
- Impact: The vulnerability can lead to denial of service (DoS) conditions, where the application becomes unresponsive or crashes. In critical systems, this can result in significant disruptions.
- Exploitability: The ease of exploitation depends on the specific conditions under which the vulnerability is triggered. Given the nature of the bug, it may require specific conditions to be met, such as threaded name resolution and connection teardown.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Network-Based Attacks: An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating network traffic to trigger the double-close condition. This could involve sending specially crafted packets or manipulating DNS responses to induce the threaded name resolve and subsequent connection teardown.
- Local Exploitation: A malicious local user or process could potentially exploit this vulnerability by causing the application to perform the problematic operations.
Exploitation Methods:
- Crafted Network Traffic: By sending malformed or specially crafted network packets, an attacker could induce the vulnerable condition.
- DNS Manipulation: Manipulating DNS responses to trigger the threaded name resolve and subsequent connection teardown.
- Local Process Manipulation: A local attacker could manipulate the application's behavior to trigger the vulnerability.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- libcurl: Versions prior to the patch release addressing CVE-2025-0665.
Affected Systems:
- Any system or application that uses the vulnerable versions of libcurl. This includes web servers, network appliances, and any software that relies on libcurl for HTTP/HTTPS communications.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Patching: Apply the latest patches or updates provided by the libcurl maintainers that address CVE-2025-0665.
- Workarounds: If patching is not immediately possible, consider implementing workarounds such as disabling threaded name resolution or limiting the use of affected features.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Regular Updates: Ensure that all systems and applications using libcurl are regularly updated to the latest versions.
- Monitoring: Implement monitoring and logging to detect any unusual behavior or crashes that may indicate exploitation attempts.
- Network Security: Use firewalls and intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) to monitor and block suspicious network traffic.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications:
- Supply Chain Risks: Given the widespread use of libcurl in various applications and systems, this vulnerability highlights the risks associated with supply chain dependencies.
- Increased Awareness: The high CVSS score and critical nature of the vulnerability underscore the importance of timely patching and regular security assessments.
- Industry Response: The cybersecurity community's response to this vulnerability will likely include increased scrutiny of similar issues in other widely-used libraries and frameworks.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Technical Analysis:
- Root Cause: The root cause is the incorrect handling of the eventfd file descriptor, which is closed twice. This is a classic example of a resource management bug.
- Code Review: Security professionals should review the codebase for similar resource management issues, ensuring that file descriptors and other resources are properly managed.
- Testing: Implement thorough testing, including fuzz testing, to identify and mitigate similar issues in other parts of the codebase.
- Documentation: Ensure that all vulnerabilities and their mitigations are well-documented to facilitate future audits and reviews.
References:
- Vendor Advisory
- Vendor Advisory JSON
- HackerOne Report
- Openwall Mailing List
- Openwall Mailing List
- NetApp Advisory
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and comprehensively, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with CVE-2025-0665 and enhance their overall cybersecurity posture.