CVE-2025-30356
CVE-2025-30356
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v4.0- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Attack Requirements
- None
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (Vulnerable)
- High
- Integrity (Vulnerable)
- High
- Availability (Vulnerable)
- High
- Confidentiality (Subsequent)
- None
- Integrity (Subsequent)
- None
- Availability (Subsequent)
- None
Description
CryptoLib provides a software-only solution using the CCSDS Space Data Link Security Protocol - Extended Procedures (SDLS-EP) to secure communications between a spacecraft running the core Flight System (cFS) and a ground station. In 1.3.3 and earlier, a heap buffer overflow vulnerability persists in the Crypto_TC_ApplySecurity function due to an incomplete validation check on the fl (frame length) field. Although CVE-2025-29912 addressed an underflow issue involving fl, the patch fails to fully prevent unsafe calculations. As a result, an attacker can still craft malicious frames that cause a negative tf_payload_len, which is then interpreted as a large unsigned value, leading to a heap buffer overflow in a memcpy call.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-30356
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-30356 CVSS Score: 9.8
Severity Evaluation: The CVSS score of 9.8 indicates a critical vulnerability. This high score is due to the potential for remote code execution, the complexity of the attack being low, and the impact being high. The vulnerability involves a heap buffer overflow, which can lead to arbitrary code execution, denial of service, or data corruption.
Vulnerability Assessment:
The vulnerability exists in the Crypto_TC_ApplySecurity function within the CryptoLib software. Specifically, it arises from an incomplete validation check on the fl (frame length) field, which can result in a heap buffer overflow. This issue persists despite a previous patch (CVE-2025-29912) that addressed an underflow issue involving the same field. The current vulnerability allows an attacker to craft malicious frames that cause a negative tf_payload_len, interpreted as a large unsigned value, leading to a heap buffer overflow during a memcpy call.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Remote Exploitation: An attacker can send specially crafted frames to the spacecraft's communication system, exploiting the vulnerability to cause a heap buffer overflow.
- Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attack: An attacker intercepting the communication between the spacecraft and the ground station can inject malicious frames to exploit the vulnerability.
- Insider Threat: An insider with access to the communication system can craft and send malicious frames to exploit the vulnerability.
Exploitation Methods:
- Heap Buffer Overflow: By sending a frame with a carefully crafted
flfield, an attacker can trigger a heap buffer overflow, potentially leading to remote code execution. - Denial of Service (DoS): An attacker can send frames that cause the system to crash or become unresponsive, leading to a denial of service.
- Data Corruption: Exploiting the vulnerability can result in data corruption, affecting the integrity of the communication between the spacecraft and the ground station.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Systems:
- Spacecraft running the core Flight System (cFS)
- Ground stations communicating with the spacecraft using CryptoLib
Software Versions:
- CryptoLib versions 1.3.3 and earlier
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
-
Patch Deployment:
- Apply the latest patch from the vendor that addresses the heap buffer overflow issue. The patch can be found at the following URL: Patch.
-
Input Validation:
- Implement robust input validation checks to ensure that the
flfield and other critical parameters are within acceptable ranges before processing.
- Implement robust input validation checks to ensure that the
-
Network Segmentation:
- Segment the communication network to limit the attack surface and reduce the risk of unauthorized access.
-
Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS):
- Deploy IDS to monitor for suspicious activity and detect potential exploitation attempts.
-
Regular Security Audits:
- Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate similar issues proactively.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Immediate Impact:
- The vulnerability poses a significant risk to the security and integrity of spacecraft communications, potentially leading to mission failures or data breaches.
- Organizations relying on CryptoLib for secure communications need to prioritize patching and implementing additional security measures.
Long-Term Impact:
- This incident highlights the importance of thorough security testing and validation, especially in critical systems like spacecraft communications.
- It underscores the need for continuous monitoring and updating of security protocols to address emerging threats.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- The vulnerability is located in the
Crypto_TC_ApplySecurityfunction. - The issue arises from an incomplete validation check on the
flfield, which can result in a negativetf_payload_lenvalue. - The negative value is interpreted as a large unsigned value, leading to a heap buffer overflow during a
memcpycall.
Exploitation Steps:
- Craft a malicious frame with a carefully chosen
flvalue that triggers the heap buffer overflow. - Send the malicious frame to the spacecraft's communication system.
- The system processes the frame, leading to a heap buffer overflow and potential remote code execution.
Mitigation Steps:
-
Code Review:
- Review the
Crypto_TC_ApplySecurityfunction to ensure proper validation of theflfield. - Implement bounds checking to prevent negative values from being interpreted as large unsigned values.
- Review the
-
Memory Safety:
- Use memory-safe functions and libraries to reduce the risk of buffer overflows.
- Consider using tools like AddressSanitizer to detect memory errors during development.
-
Security Testing:
- Conduct thorough security testing, including fuzz testing, to identify and mitigate similar vulnerabilities.
By addressing these technical details and implementing the recommended mitigation strategies, organizations can significantly reduce the risk posed by CVE-2025-30356 and enhance the overall security of their spacecraft communications.