CVE-2025-47855
CVE-2025-47855
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor [CWE-200] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiFone 7.0.0 through 7.0.1, FortiFone 3.0.13 through 3.0.23 allows an unauthenticated attacker to obtain the device configuration via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-47855
CVE ID: CVE-2025-47855 CISA Vulnerability Name: CVE-2025-47855 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) CWE: CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor)
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2025-47855 is a critical information disclosure vulnerability affecting Fortinet’s FortiFone VoIP (Voice over IP) devices. The flaw allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to extract the device configuration—which may include sensitive credentials, network settings, SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) authentication details, and other operational parameters—via crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network | Exploitable remotely over the network without physical access. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None | No authentication or elevated privileges needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged | Impact is confined to the vulnerable device. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High | Full disclosure of sensitive configuration data. |
| Integrity (I) | None | No direct modification of data, but leaked credentials could enable further attacks. |
| Availability (A) | None | No direct impact on availability, but subsequent attacks may disrupt services. |
Resulting CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) This classification aligns with NIST’s definition of a critical vulnerability, given the low attack complexity, high confidentiality impact, and unauthenticated remote exploitability.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Mechanism
The vulnerability stems from improper access controls in the FortiFone web interface, allowing unauthenticated users to retrieve the device configuration via:
- Malformed HTTP/HTTPS requests (e.g., manipulated headers, path traversal, or API abuse).
- Exploitation of an unauthenticated API endpoint that serves configuration data.
- Session fixation or weak session management that fails to validate request legitimacy.
Step-by-Step Exploitation (Hypothetical)
-
Reconnaissance:
- Attacker identifies a vulnerable FortiFone device via Shodan, Censys, or mass scanning (e.g., searching for
FortiFonein HTTP banners). - Determines the firmware version (7.0.0–7.0.1 or 3.0.13–3.0.23) via
/versionor/statusendpoints.
- Attacker identifies a vulnerable FortiFone device via Shodan, Censys, or mass scanning (e.g., searching for
-
Crafting the Exploit:
- The attacker sends a specially crafted HTTP/HTTPS request to an exposed endpoint (e.g.,
/config/get,/admin/export, or a hidden API path). - Possible techniques:
- Path traversal (e.g.,
GET /../../config.xml). - Header manipulation (e.g.,
X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1to bypass IP restrictions). - Parameter tampering (e.g.,
?action=export&type=full).
- Path traversal (e.g.,
- The attacker sends a specially crafted HTTP/HTTPS request to an exposed endpoint (e.g.,
-
Data Exfiltration:
- The device responds with a configuration file (e.g.,
config.xml,backup.cfg) containing:- SIP credentials (usernames, passwords, server IPs).
- Network settings (VLANs, DHCP, static routes).
- Administrative credentials (hashed or plaintext).
- Call logs, contact lists, or CDR (Call Detail Records).
- TLS/SSL certificates (if stored in the config).
- The device responds with a configuration file (e.g.,
-
Post-Exploitation:
- Credential reuse to compromise other systems (e.g., SIP servers, VoIP gateways).
- VoIP fraud (e.g., toll fraud, call spoofing, eavesdropping).
- Lateral movement into the corporate network if the FortiFone is on an internal VLAN.
- Persistence by modifying the configuration to maintain access.
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Considerations
While no public PoC exists at the time of analysis, security researchers may develop one by:
- Fuzzing HTTP endpoints (e.g., using Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP).
- Reverse-engineering firmware to identify hardcoded API paths.
- Analyzing network traffic from legitimate admin sessions to replicate requests.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Products
| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Versions |
|---|---|---|
| FortiFone | 7.0.0 – 7.0.1 | 7.0.2 (or later) |
| FortiFone | 3.0.13 – 3.0.23 | 3.0.24 (or later) |
Deployment Context
- Enterprise VoIP environments (corporate offices, call centers).
- SMB (Small/Medium Business) deployments with Fortinet VoIP solutions.
- Cloud-connected VoIP systems (if the device is exposed to the internet).
Detection Methods
- Network Scanning:
- Use Nmap to identify FortiFone devices:
nmap -p 80,443 --script http-fortifone-info <target>
- Use Nmap to identify FortiFone devices:
- Firmware Verification:
- Check the web interface (
/version) or CLI (get system status).
- Check the web interface (
- Log Analysis:
- Monitor for unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests to
/configor/adminendpoints.
- Monitor for unusual HTTP/HTTPS requests to
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
-
Apply Patches:
- Upgrade to FortiFone 7.0.2+ or 3.0.24+ immediately.
- Follow Fortinet’s PSIRT advisory (FG-IR-25-260) for patching instructions.
-
Network-Level Protections:
- Restrict access to the FortiFone web interface via:
- Firewall rules (allow only trusted IPs).
- VPN-only access (disable public internet exposure).
- Segment VoIP traffic using VLANs to isolate FortiFone devices from the corporate network.
- Restrict access to the FortiFone web interface via:
-
Temporary Workarounds (if patching is delayed):
- Disable HTTP/HTTPS access if not required (use SSH or console-only management).
- Rate-limit requests to the web interface to prevent brute-force attacks.
- Deploy a WAF (Web Application Firewall) to block malicious requests (e.g., ModSecurity with OWASP Core Rule Set).
-
Credential Rotation:
- Change all passwords stored in the configuration (SIP, admin, LDAP, etc.).
- Revoke and reissue certificates if they were exposed.
Long-Term Hardening
- Enable logging and monitoring for FortiFone devices (SIEM integration).
- Conduct a VoIP security audit to identify other misconfigurations.
- Implement MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) for administrative access.
- Regularly update firmware and subscribe to Fortinet’s PSIRT alerts.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Enterprise Risk
- VoIP-Specific Threats:
- Toll fraud (unauthorized international calls costing millions).
- Eavesdropping (intercepting VoIP calls via SIP credentials).
- Call spoofing (impersonating executives for social engineering).
- Lateral Movement:
- Exposed credentials may grant access to SIP servers, PBX systems, or Active Directory.
- Compliance Violations:
- PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR may be violated if call logs or PII are exposed.
Broader Implications
- Supply Chain Risks:
- If FortiFone is integrated with other Fortinet products (e.g., FortiGate, FortiVoice), the attack surface expands.
- Zero-Day Exploitation:
- Given the CVSS 9.8, threat actors (e.g., APT groups, ransomware gangs) may weaponize this before patches are widely deployed.
- IoT/VoIP Security Awareness:
- Highlights the neglect of VoIP security in many organizations, despite its critical role in business communications.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability likely stems from:
- Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR):
- The web interface fails to validate whether a requester is authenticated before serving configuration files.
- Missing Access Controls:
- Endpoints like
/config/exportor/admin/backupmay lack proper session validation or CSRF tokens.
- Endpoints like
- Hardcoded API Paths:
- Some FortiFone firmware versions may have undocumented API endpoints that return sensitive data without authentication.
Exploitation Indicators (IOCs)
| Indicator | Description |
|---|---|
| HTTP Requests | GET /config/get?type=full (or similar) |
| Response Headers | Content-Type: application/xml (config file) |
| Log Entries | Unauthenticated access to /admin or /config |
| Network Traffic | Large HTTP responses (config files are often >10KB) |
Forensic Analysis
- Logs to Review:
- FortiFone web access logs (
/var/log/httpd/access_log). - SIP server logs (for unauthorized registration attempts).
- Firewall logs (unusual outbound connections from the FortiFone).
- FortiFone web access logs (
- Memory Forensics:
- Check for malicious processes (e.g., reverse shells) if post-exploitation occurred.
- Analyze running configurations for unauthorized changes.
Reverse Engineering (Advanced)
- Firmware Extraction:
- Download the firmware from Fortinet’s support portal and extract it using binwalk:
binwalk -e FortiFone_7.0.1_Firmware.bin
- Download the firmware from Fortinet’s support portal and extract it using binwalk:
- Binary Analysis:
- Use Ghidra or IDA Pro to analyze the web server binary (
/usr/sbin/httpdor similar). - Search for hardcoded API paths or authentication bypass logic.
- Use Ghidra or IDA Pro to analyze the web server binary (
- Dynamic Analysis:
- Set up a test FortiFone in a lab and intercept traffic with Burp Suite to identify vulnerable endpoints.
Conclusion
CVE-2025-47855 represents a critical unauthenticated information disclosure vulnerability in Fortinet FortiFone devices, with severe implications for VoIP security. Given its CVSS 9.8 score, organizations must patch immediately, restrict network access, and rotate exposed credentials to mitigate risk.
Security teams should monitor for exploitation attempts, conduct forensic analysis if a breach is suspected, and harden VoIP infrastructure to prevent similar vulnerabilities in the future. This incident underscores the importance of securing often-overlooked VoIP systems, which can serve as high-value targets for attackers.
For further updates, refer to Fortinet’s PSIRT advisory (FG-IR-25-260) and CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.
Recommended Next Steps:
- Patch all affected FortiFone devices within 24–48 hours.
- Isolate VoIP networks from corporate LANs.
- Conduct a VoIP security assessment to identify other risks.
- Monitor for IOCs related to this CVE.