CVE-2025-48890
CVE-2025-48890
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v4.0- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Attack Requirements
- None
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (Vulnerable)
- High
- Integrity (Vulnerable)
- High
- Availability (Vulnerable)
- High
- Confidentiality (Subsequent)
- None
- Integrity (Subsequent)
- None
- Availability (Subsequent)
- None
Description
WRH-733GBK and WRH-733GWH contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability in miniigd SOAP service. If a remote unauthenticated attacker sends a specially crafted request to the affected product, an arbitrary OS command may be executed.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-48890
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-48890 Description: The vulnerability affects WRH-733GBK and WRH-733GWH devices, specifically within the miniigd SOAP service. It involves an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, commonly known as 'OS Command Injection'. This flaw allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands by sending a specially crafted request.
CVSS Score: 9.8 Severity: Critical
The high CVSS score of 9.8 indicates a severe vulnerability due to the following factors:
- Attack Vector: Network (AV:N)
- Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L)
- Privileges Required: None (PR:N)
- User Interaction: None (UI:N)
- Scope: Unchanged (S:U)
- Confidentiality Impact: High (C:H)
- Integrity Impact: High (I:H)
- Availability Impact: High (A:H)
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Remote Unauthenticated Attack: An attacker can exploit this vulnerability without needing any authentication, making it highly accessible.
- Network-Based Attack: The attack can be conducted over the network, allowing for remote exploitation.
Exploitation Methods:
- Crafted SOAP Requests: An attacker can send specially crafted SOAP requests to the miniigd service, embedding malicious OS commands.
- Command Injection: The injected commands can be executed with the privileges of the miniigd service, potentially leading to full system compromise.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Devices:
- WRH-733GBK
- WRH-733GWH
Affected Software:
- miniigd SOAP service
Note: The specific versions of the miniigd SOAP service affected are not mentioned in the CVE description. It is crucial to identify and update all instances of the miniigd service running on the affected devices.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
- Patch Management: Apply the latest patches and updates provided by the vendor for the miniigd SOAP service.
- Network Segmentation: Isolate affected devices from critical networks to limit the potential impact.
- Firewall Rules: Implement strict firewall rules to block unauthorized access to the miniigd SOAP service.
Long-Term Strategies:
- Regular Audits: Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments.
- Intrusion Detection: Deploy intrusion detection systems (IDS) to monitor for suspicious activities.
- User Education: Educate users on the risks of OS command injection and the importance of secure coding practices.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Immediate Impact:
- System Compromise: Affected devices can be fully compromised, leading to data breaches, unauthorized access, and potential lateral movement within the network.
- Service Disruption: The execution of arbitrary commands can disrupt services, leading to downtime and operational disruptions.
Long-Term Impact:
- Reputation Damage: Organizations using affected devices may face reputational damage due to security breaches.
- Compliance Issues: Non-compliance with security standards and regulations can result in legal and financial penalties.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- Root Cause: Improper neutralization of special elements in OS commands within the miniigd SOAP service.
- Exploitation: The vulnerability can be exploited by injecting malicious commands into SOAP requests, which are then executed by the underlying OS.
Detection Methods:
- Log Analysis: Monitor logs for unusual or unauthorized OS commands being executed.
- Behavioral Analysis: Use behavioral analysis tools to detect anomalous activities that may indicate command injection attempts.
Mitigation Techniques:
- Input Validation: Implement robust input validation to sanitize and neutralize special elements in SOAP requests.
- Least Privilege: Ensure that the miniigd service runs with the least privileges necessary to minimize the impact of a successful exploit.
References:
Conclusion
CVE-2025-48890 represents a critical vulnerability that requires immediate attention from cybersecurity professionals. The potential for remote unauthenticated command injection poses a significant risk to affected systems. Organizations should prioritize patching and implementing robust security measures to mitigate this threat effectively. Regular monitoring and proactive security practices are essential to safeguard against such vulnerabilities in the future.