CVE-2025-50472
CVE-2025-50472
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
The modelscope/ms-swift library thru 2.6.1 is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through deserialization of untrusted data within the `load_model_meta()` function of the `ModelFileSystemCache()` class. Attackers can execute arbitrary code and commands by crafting a malicious serialized `.mdl` payload, exploiting the use of `pickle.load()` on data from potentially untrusted sources. This vulnerability allows for remote code execution (RCE) by deceiving victims into loading a seemingly harmless checkpoint during a normal training process, thereby enabling attackers to execute arbitrary code on the targeted machine. Note that the payload file is a hidden file, making it difficult for the victim to detect tampering. More importantly, during the model training process, after the `.mdl` file is loaded and executes arbitrary code, the normal training process remains unaffected'meaning the user remains unaware of the arbitrary code execution.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-50472
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-50472 CVSS Score: 9.8
Severity Evaluation:
The CVSS score of 9.8 indicates a critical vulnerability. This high score is due to the potential for remote code execution (RCE), which can lead to complete system compromise. The vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by exploiting the deserialization of untrusted data within the load_model_meta() function of the ModelFileSystemCache() class.
Key Factors Contributing to Severity:
- Exploitability: The vulnerability can be exploited remotely.
- Impact: Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution, leading to potential data breaches, system takeovers, and further malicious activities.
- Complexity: The attack vector is relatively straightforward, requiring only the ability to craft a malicious
.mdlfile and deceive the victim into loading it.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Malicious Model Files: Attackers can craft a malicious
.mdlfile containing serialized payloads that exploit thepickle.load()function. - Supply Chain Attacks: Compromising the distribution channels of model files to inject malicious payloads.
- Phishing and Social Engineering: Tricking users into downloading and loading compromised model files.
Exploitation Methods:
- Payload Crafting: Attackers can create a serialized payload that, when deserialized, executes arbitrary code.
- Hidden Payloads: The payload file is hidden, making it difficult for victims to detect tampering.
- Persistent Execution: The normal training process remains unaffected after the payload execution, making detection even more challenging.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- modelscope/ms-swift library versions up to and including 2.6.1.
Affected Systems:
- Any system or environment where the
modelscope/ms-swiftlibrary is used, particularly in machine learning and model training workflows.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
- Patching: Upgrade to a patched version of the
modelscope/ms-swiftlibrary that addresses this vulnerability. - Input Validation: Implement strict input validation and sanitization for model files.
- Avoid Untrusted Sources: Only load model files from trusted and verified sources.
Long-Term Strategies:
- Secure Deserialization: Use secure deserialization libraries or methods that do not rely on
pickle.load(). - Code Review: Conduct thorough code reviews to identify and mitigate similar vulnerabilities.
- Monitoring and Logging: Enhance monitoring and logging to detect unusual activities during model loading and training processes.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications:
- Supply Chain Security: Highlights the importance of securing the supply chain for machine learning models and libraries.
- Trust and Verification: Emphasizes the need for robust verification mechanisms for model files and other critical assets.
- Awareness and Training: Increases the necessity for user awareness and training to recognize and avoid potential phishing and social engineering attacks.
Industry-Wide Concerns:
- Machine Learning Security: Raises concerns about the security of machine learning workflows and the potential for hidden, persistent threats.
- Compliance and Regulation: May influence future compliance and regulatory requirements for securing machine learning and AI systems.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerable Code Snippet:
def load_model_meta(self, model_file):
with open(model_file, 'rb') as f:
model_meta = pickle.load(f)
return model_meta
Exploitation Details:
- Deserialization Issue: The use of
pickle.load()on untrusted data allows for arbitrary code execution. - Hidden Payload: The payload file is hidden, making detection difficult.
- Persistent Execution: The normal training process continues unaffected, making the attack stealthy.
Mitigation Code Example:
import json
def load_model_meta(self, model_file):
with open(model_file, 'r') as f:
model_meta = json.load(f)
return model_meta
Recommendations:
- Use Safe Deserialization: Replace
pickle.load()with safer alternatives likejson.load(). - Implement Checksums: Use checksums or digital signatures to verify the integrity of model files.
- Regular Audits: Conduct regular security audits and code reviews to identify and mitigate similar vulnerabilities.
Conclusion
CVE-2025-50472 represents a critical vulnerability in the modelscope/ms-swift library, allowing for remote code execution through deserialization of untrusted data. Mitigation strategies include patching, input validation, secure deserialization, and enhanced monitoring. The broader implications highlight the need for robust security practices in machine learning workflows and the importance of securing the supply chain for critical assets.