CVE-2025-53104
CVE-2025-53104
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Description
gluestack-ui is a library of copy-pasteable components & patterns crafted with Tailwind CSS (NativeWind). Prior to commit e6b4271, a command injection vulnerability was discovered in the discussion-to-slack.yml GitHub Actions workflow. Untrusted discussion fields (title, body, etc.) were directly interpolated into shell commands in a run: block. An attacker could craft a malicious GitHub Discussion title or body (e.g., $(curl ...)) to execute arbitrary shell commands on the Actions runner. This issue has been fixed in commit e6b4271 where the discussion-to-slack.yml workflow was removed. Users should remove the discussion-to-slack.yml workflow if using a fork or derivative of this repository.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-53104
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-53104 CVSS Score: 9.1
The vulnerability in question is a command injection flaw in the discussion-to-slack.yml GitHub Actions workflow within the gluestack-ui library. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands on the Actions runner by crafting malicious input in GitHub Discussion fields such as the title or body. The severity of this vulnerability is rated as critical (CVSS Score: 9.1) due to the potential for remote code execution (RCE), which can lead to significant security breaches.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Malicious Input Injection: An attacker can inject malicious commands into the GitHub Discussion title or body. For example, using a command like
$(curl ...)can trigger a shell command execution. - Supply Chain Attack: If an attacker can manipulate the discussion fields in a repository that uses the vulnerable workflow, they can execute arbitrary commands on the Actions runner.
Exploitation Methods:
- Direct Command Injection: By embedding shell commands within the discussion fields, an attacker can execute these commands on the runner.
- Chaining Exploits: An attacker could chain this vulnerability with other exploits to gain deeper access into the system or network.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Systems:
- Any GitHub repository using the
gluestack-uilibrary prior to commite6b4271. - Any forks or derivatives of the
gluestack-uirepository that still include thediscussion-to-slack.ymlworkflow.
Software Versions:
- All versions of
gluestack-uiprior to the fix in commite6b4271.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
- Remove Vulnerable Workflow: Users should immediately remove the
discussion-to-slack.ymlworkflow from their repositories if they are using a fork or derivative ofgluestack-ui. - Update to Fixed Version: Ensure that the repository is updated to include the fix from commit
e6b4271.
Long-Term Strategies:
- Input Sanitization: Implement robust input sanitization and validation mechanisms to prevent command injection.
- Least Privilege Principle: Ensure that GitHub Actions runners operate with the least privilege necessary to minimize the impact of potential exploits.
- Regular Audits: Conduct regular security audits and code reviews to identify and mitigate similar vulnerabilities.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
The discovery and exploitation of this vulnerability highlight the importance of securing CI/CD pipelines and automated workflows. Command injection vulnerabilities in CI/CD systems can have severe consequences, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and system compromises. This incident underscores the need for:
- Enhanced Security Practices: Organizations must adopt stringent security practices for CI/CD pipelines, including regular updates and patches.
- Supply Chain Security: Ensuring the security of third-party libraries and dependencies is crucial to maintaining a secure software supply chain.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- Root Cause: The vulnerability arises from the direct interpolation of untrusted discussion fields into shell commands within the
run:block of thediscussion-to-slack.ymlworkflow. - Fix: The issue was resolved by removing the vulnerable workflow in commit
e6b4271.
Detection and Monitoring:
- Log Analysis: Monitor GitHub Actions logs for any unusual command executions or anomalies.
- Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): Implement IDS to detect and alert on suspicious activities within the CI/CD pipeline.
Incident Response:
- Containment: Immediately remove the vulnerable workflow and update to the fixed version.
- Forensic Analysis: Conduct a thorough forensic analysis to determine the extent of the compromise and identify any additional vulnerabilities.
- Remediation: Apply patches and updates, and implement additional security measures to prevent future incidents.
Conclusion: CVE-2025-53104 is a critical command injection vulnerability that underscores the importance of securing CI/CD pipelines and automated workflows. Organizations must take immediate action to mitigate this vulnerability and adopt robust security practices to protect against similar threats in the future.