CVE-2025-54469
CVE-2025-54469
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- Low
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
A vulnerability was identified in NeuVector, where the enforcer used environment variables CLUSTER_RPC_PORT and CLUSTER_LAN_PORT to generate a command to be executed via popen, without first sanitising their values. The entry process of the enforcer container is the monitor process. When the enforcer container stops, the monitor process checks whether the consul subprocess has exited. To perform this check, the monitor process uses the popen function to execute a shell command that determines whether the ports used by the consul subprocess are still active. The values of environment variables CLUSTER_RPC_PORT and CLUSTER_LAN_PORT are used directly to compose shell commands via popen without validation or sanitization. This behavior could allow a malicious user to inject malicious commands through these variables within the enforcer container.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-54469
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Description:
CVE-2025-54469 identifies a critical vulnerability in NeuVector, a container security platform. The vulnerability arises from the improper handling of environment variables CLUSTER_RPC_PORT and CLUSTER_LAN_PORT within the enforcer container. These variables are used to construct shell commands executed via the popen function without proper sanitization or validation. This lack of input validation can lead to command injection attacks.
Severity Evaluation: The CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) score of 9.9 indicates a critical severity level. This high score is due to the potential for complete system compromise, including unauthorized access, data breaches, and denial of service.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Command Injection: An attacker can manipulate the environment variables
CLUSTER_RPC_PORTandCLUSTER_LAN_PORTto inject malicious commands. These commands are then executed by thepopenfunction, leading to arbitrary code execution within the enforcer container. - Privilege Escalation: If the enforcer container runs with elevated privileges, an attacker could escalate their privileges to gain control over the host system or other containers.
Exploitation Methods:
- Environment Variable Manipulation: An attacker with access to the environment variables can inject shell commands by embedding them within the
CLUSTER_RPC_PORTandCLUSTER_LAN_PORTvalues. - Supply Chain Attacks: An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by compromising the build or deployment process to inject malicious environment variables.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Systems:
- NeuVector enforcer containers running in environments where the
CLUSTER_RPC_PORTandCLUSTER_LAN_PORTenvironment variables are set. - Systems where the enforcer container has access to sensitive data or critical services.
Software Versions:
- Specific versions of NeuVector software prior to the release of a patch addressing CVE-2025-54469.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Environment Variable Sanitization: Ensure that all environment variables used in shell commands are properly sanitized and validated.
- Least Privilege Principle: Run the enforcer container with the minimum necessary privileges to limit the impact of a potential exploit.
- Monitoring and Logging: Implement robust monitoring and logging to detect and respond to any suspicious activities related to environment variable manipulation.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Patch Deployment: Apply the official patch from NeuVector that addresses CVE-2025-54469 as soon as it becomes available.
- Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and code reviews to identify and mitigate similar vulnerabilities.
- Container Security Best Practices: Follow best practices for container security, including using secure base images, minimizing container capabilities, and employing network segmentation.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Immediate Impact:
- Increased Risk of Exploitation: Organizations using NeuVector are at increased risk of command injection attacks, which can lead to significant security breaches.
- Reputation Damage: A successful exploit could result in data breaches, service disruptions, and reputational damage for affected organizations.
Long-Term Impact:
- Enhanced Awareness: This vulnerability highlights the importance of input validation and sanitization in containerized environments, leading to improved security practices.
- Industry Response: The cybersecurity community and vendors will likely focus more on securing environment variables and improving container security measures.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Technical Analysis:
- Vulnerable Code: The vulnerability stems from the use of unsanitized environment variables in shell commands executed via
popen. For example:
This code snippet is vulnerable to command injection ifchar command[256]; snprintf(command, sizeof(command), "netstat -tuln | grep %s", getenv("CLUSTER_RPC_PORT")); FILE *fp = popen(command, "r");CLUSTER_RPC_PORTcontains malicious input.
Mitigation Code Example:
- Sanitization: Ensure that environment variables are sanitized before use:
Wherechar *port = getenv("CLUSTER_RPC_PORT"); if (port && isValidPort(port)) { char command[256]; snprintf(command, sizeof(command), "netstat -tuln | grep %s", port); FILE *fp = popen(command, "r"); // Process the output } else { // Handle invalid port value }isValidPortis a function that validates the port value.
Detection:
- Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): Implement IDS rules to detect unusual patterns in environment variable usage and shell command execution.
- Anomaly Detection: Use anomaly detection techniques to identify deviations from normal behavior in container logs and network traffic.
Conclusion: CVE-2025-54469 underscores the critical importance of input validation and sanitization in containerized environments. Organizations must prioritize patching affected systems and implementing robust security measures to mitigate the risk of command injection attacks. By adopting best practices and conducting regular security audits, organizations can enhance their overall cybersecurity posture and protect against similar vulnerabilities.