CVE-2025-54482
CVE-2025-54482
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 8751 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 4: else if (tag==4) { // SPR if (len>4) fprintf(stderr,"Warning MFER tag4 incorrect length %i>4\n",len); curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-54482
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-54482 CVSS Score: 9.8
The vulnerability in question is a stack-based buffer overflow in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project's libbiosig library, versions 3.9.0 and the master branch (commit 35a819fa). This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code by providing a specially crafted MFER file. The high CVSS score of 9.8 indicates a critical severity, reflecting the potential for significant impact if exploited.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Malicious File Upload: An attacker could upload a crafted MFER file to a system that processes these files using the vulnerable libbiosig library.
- Phishing: An attacker could trick a user into downloading and opening a malicious MFER file.
- Supply Chain Attack: An attacker could compromise a software distribution channel to include the malicious MFER file.
Exploitation Methods:
- Buffer Overflow: The vulnerability occurs when the
tagis 4 and thelenexceeds 4. This can lead to a buffer overflow, allowing the attacker to overwrite adjacent memory and execute arbitrary code. - Code Execution: By carefully crafting the MFER file, an attacker can inject malicious code that gets executed when the file is parsed.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0
- The Biosig Project libbiosig Master Branch (commit 35a819fa)
Affected Systems:
- Any system or application that uses the vulnerable versions of the libbiosig library to parse MFER files.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Patching: Upgrade to a patched version of libbiosig that addresses this vulnerability.
- Input Validation: Implement strict input validation to ensure that MFER files are properly formatted and do not contain malicious content.
- Sandboxing: Run the parsing functionality in a sandboxed environment to limit the impact of any potential exploitation.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review to identify and fix similar vulnerabilities.
- Security Training: Educate developers on secure coding practices to prevent future buffer overflow vulnerabilities.
- Regular Updates: Ensure that all software dependencies are regularly updated to the latest secure versions.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
The discovery of this vulnerability highlights the importance of secure coding practices and regular security audits. Buffer overflow vulnerabilities, while well-known, continue to be a significant threat due to their potential for arbitrary code execution. This incident underscores the need for continuous vigilance and proactive security measures in software development and deployment.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerable Code Snippet:
else if (tag==4) {
// SPR
if (len>4) fprintf(stderr,"Warning MFER tag4 incorrect length %i>4\n",len);
curPos += ifread(buf,1,len,hdr);
}
Technical Analysis:
- The vulnerability arises from the lack of proper bounds checking when reading data into the buffer
buf. - When
lenexceeds 4, theifreadfunction reads more data than the buffer can hold, leading to a stack-based buffer overflow. - The
curPosvariable is incremented by the length of data read, which can result in unintended memory overwrites.
Exploitation Steps:
- Crafting the Malicious File: Create an MFER file with a
tagvalue of 4 and alenvalue greater than 4. - Payload Injection: Inject a payload into the MFER file that, when parsed, will overwrite the stack and execute the injected code.
- Delivery: Deliver the malicious file to the target system through phishing, file upload, or other means.
Detection and Response:
- Monitoring: Implement monitoring for unusual file parsing activities and anomalous behavior.
- Incident Response: Have an incident response plan in place to quickly address any detected exploitation attempts.
- Logging: Ensure comprehensive logging of file parsing operations to aid in forensic analysis.
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and implementing robust security measures, organizations can mitigate the risk of exploitation and enhance their overall cybersecurity posture.