CVE-2025-54490
CVE-2025-54490
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project libbiosig 3.9.0 and Master Branch (35a819fa). A specially crafted MFER file can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability.This vulnerability manifests on line 9090 of biosig.c on the current master branch (35a819fa), when the Tag is 64: else if (tag==64) //0x40 { // preamble char tmp[256]; // [1] curPos += ifread(tmp,1,len,hdr); In this case, the overflowed buffer is the newly-declared `tmp` \[1\] instead of `buf`. While `tmp` is larger than `buf`, having a size of 256 bytes, a stack overflow can still occur in cases where `len` is encoded using multiple octets and is greater than 256.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-54490
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-54490
Description:
The vulnerability is a stack-based buffer overflow in the MFER parsing functionality of The Biosig Project's libbiosig library, versions 3.9.0 and the Master Branch (commit 35a819fa). The issue arises when processing a specially crafted MFER file, which can lead to arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability is located on line 9090 of biosig.c in the master branch, specifically when the tag is 64 (0x40).
Severity: The CVSS score of 9.8 indicates a critical vulnerability. This high score is due to the potential for arbitrary code execution, which can result in complete system compromise.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Malicious File Upload: An attacker can craft an MFER file with a malicious payload designed to exploit the buffer overflow. This file can be uploaded or sent to a system that uses the vulnerable libbiosig library.
- Phishing: Attackers can use social engineering techniques to trick users into downloading and opening the malicious MFER file.
- Supply Chain Attacks: If the libbiosig library is used in other software products, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability through those products.
Exploitation Methods:
- Buffer Overflow: The attacker can exploit the buffer overflow by providing a
lenvalue greater than 256 bytes, causing thetmpbuffer to overflow. - Arbitrary Code Execution: By carefully crafting the payload, the attacker can execute arbitrary code, potentially leading to remote code execution (RCE).
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- The Biosig Project libbiosig versions 3.9.0 and the Master Branch (commit 35a819fa).
Affected Systems:
- Any system or application that uses the vulnerable versions of the libbiosig library to parse MFER files.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Patching: Upgrade to a patched version of libbiosig as soon as it becomes available.
- Input Validation: Implement strict input validation to ensure that
lenvalues do not exceed the buffer size. - File Sanitization: Use file sanitization techniques to detect and block malicious MFER files.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review to identify and fix similar vulnerabilities.
- Security Training: Provide security training for developers to prevent future buffer overflow issues.
- Regular Updates: Ensure that all software dependencies are regularly updated to the latest versions.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Immediate Impact:
- System Compromise: Systems using the vulnerable libbiosig library are at risk of arbitrary code execution, leading to potential data breaches and system compromises.
- Supply Chain Risks: If the library is used in other software products, the vulnerability can propagate through the supply chain, affecting multiple systems and organizations.
Long-Term Impact:
- Increased Awareness: This vulnerability highlights the importance of secure coding practices and regular security audits.
- Enhanced Security Measures: Organizations may adopt more stringent security measures, including regular code reviews and input validation.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerable Code Snippet:
else if (tag==64) //0x40
{
// preamble
char tmp[256]; // [1]
curPos += ifread(tmp,1,len,hdr);
}
Technical Analysis:
- The
tmpbuffer is declared with a size of 256 bytes. - The
ifreadfunction readslenbytes into thetmpbuffer. - If
lenis greater than 256, a stack overflow occurs, leading to arbitrary code execution.
Mitigation Code Example:
else if (tag==64) //0x40
{
// preamble
char tmp[256]; // [1]
if (len > sizeof(tmp)) {
// Handle error or truncate len
len = sizeof(tmp);
}
curPos += ifread(tmp,1,len,hdr);
}
Recommendations:
- Boundary Checking: Always check the boundaries of input data to prevent buffer overflows.
- Secure Coding Practices: Follow secure coding practices, such as using safe string functions and avoiding direct manipulation of stack buffers.
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and adopting robust security measures, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with CVE-2025-54490 and enhance their overall cybersecurity posture.