CVE-2025-55013
CVE-2025-55013
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Adjacent
- Attack Complexity
- High
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Description
The Assemblyline 4 Service Client interfaces with the API to fetch tasks and publish the result for a service in Assemblyline 4. In versions below 4.6.1.dev138, the Assemblyline 4 Service Client (task_handler.py) accepts a SHA-256 value returned by the service server and uses it directly as a local file name.A malicious or compromised server (or any MITM that can speak to client) can return a path-traversal payload such as `../../../etc/cron.d/evil` and force the client to write the downloaded bytes to an arbitrary location on disk. This is fixed in version 4.6.1.dev138.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-55013
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-55013
Description: The Assemblyline 4 Service Client interfaces with the API to fetch tasks and publish results for a service in Assemblyline 4. In versions below 4.6.1.dev138, the Assemblyline 4 Service Client (task_handler.py) accepts a SHA-256 value returned by the service server and uses it directly as a local file name. This vulnerability allows a malicious or compromised server (or any Man-In-The-Middle (MITM) attacker) to return a path-traversal payload, such as ../../../etc/cron.d/evil, forcing the client to write the downloaded bytes to an arbitrary location on disk.
CVSS Score: 10
Severity Evaluation:
- Critical: The CVSS score of 10 indicates a critical vulnerability. This high score is due to the potential for complete system compromise, including arbitrary file writes, which can lead to code execution and data corruption.
- Impact: The vulnerability can result in unauthorized access, data breaches, and system integrity violations.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Malicious Server: An attacker with control over the service server can send a crafted SHA-256 value that includes a path-traversal payload.
- Man-In-The-Middle (MITM): An attacker intercepting the communication between the client and the server can inject the malicious payload.
- Compromised Network: An attacker with access to the network can manipulate the data being sent to the client.
Exploitation Methods:
- Path Traversal: The attacker can exploit the vulnerability by sending a SHA-256 value that includes directory traversal sequences (e.g.,
../../../etc/cron.d/evil). - Arbitrary File Write: The attacker can write arbitrary files to sensitive locations on the client's filesystem, potentially leading to code execution or configuration changes.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- Assemblyline 4 Service Client versions below 4.6.1.dev138
Affected Systems:
- Any system running the vulnerable versions of the Assemblyline 4 Service Client.
- Systems that interface with the Assemblyline 4 API and use the task_handler.py module.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
- Upgrade: Upgrade to Assemblyline 4 Service Client version 4.6.1.dev138 or later, which includes the fix for this vulnerability.
- Network Security: Implement strong network security measures to prevent MITM attacks, such as using encrypted communication channels (e.g., TLS).
- Monitoring: Increase monitoring of network traffic and API interactions to detect any suspicious activities.
Long-Term Strategies:
- Code Review: Conduct thorough code reviews to identify and mitigate similar vulnerabilities in other parts of the codebase.
- Input Validation: Ensure that all inputs, especially those from external sources, are properly validated and sanitized.
- Security Training: Provide regular security training for developers to raise awareness about common vulnerabilities and secure coding practices.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications:
- Supply Chain Security: This vulnerability highlights the importance of securing the entire software supply chain, including third-party services and APIs.
- Zero Trust: Emphasizes the need for a zero-trust security model, where no part of the system is trusted by default.
- Incident Response: Organizations need to have robust incident response plans to quickly address and mitigate such critical vulnerabilities.
Industry Trends:
- Increased focus on secure coding practices and automated security testing.
- Growing adoption of DevSecOps to integrate security into the development lifecycle.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- Root Cause: The vulnerability arises from the lack of proper input validation and sanitization of the SHA-256 value returned by the service server.
- Exploit Mechanism: The attacker can craft a SHA-256 value that includes directory traversal sequences, allowing them to write to arbitrary locations on the client's filesystem.
Detection and Response:
- Log Analysis: Review logs for any unusual file write operations or API interactions.
- Intrusion Detection: Implement intrusion detection systems (IDS) to monitor for suspicious network activities.
- Patch Management: Ensure that all systems are regularly updated with the latest security patches.
Conclusion: CVE-2025-55013 is a critical vulnerability that underscores the importance of secure coding practices and robust input validation. Organizations should prioritize upgrading to the patched version and implement comprehensive security measures to mitigate similar risks in the future.