CVE-2025-61385
CVE-2025-61385
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
SQL injection vulnerability in tlocke pg8000 1.31.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a specially crafted Python list input to function pg8000.native.literal.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-61385
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-61385
Description: SQL injection vulnerability in tlocke pg8000 1.31.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via a specially crafted Python list input to function pg8000.native.literal.
CVSS Score: 9.6
Severity Evaluation: The CVSS score of 9.6 indicates a critical vulnerability. This high score is due to the potential for remote code execution, which can lead to significant data breaches, unauthorized access, and system compromise. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands, potentially leading to data exfiltration, data corruption, or complete system takeover.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Remote Exploitation: Attackers can exploit this vulnerability remotely by sending specially crafted Python list inputs to the
pg8000.native.literalfunction. - Web Applications: Web applications that use the
pg8000library to interact with PostgreSQL databases are particularly at risk. Attackers can manipulate user inputs to inject malicious SQL commands.
Exploitation Methods:
- SQL Injection: Attackers can craft SQL commands embedded within Python list inputs. These commands can be used to extract sensitive data, modify database contents, or execute administrative operations.
- Automated Tools: Attackers may use automated tools to scan for vulnerable systems and exploit the vulnerability en masse.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- tlocke pg8000 version 1.31.4
Affected Systems:
- Any system or application that uses the
pg8000library version 1.31.4 to interact with PostgreSQL databases. - Web applications, backend services, and any other software that relies on
pg8000for database operations.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
- Patching: Upgrade to a patched version of the
pg8000library as soon as it becomes available. - Input Validation: Implement strict input validation and sanitization to prevent malicious inputs from reaching the database.
- Parameterized Queries: Use parameterized queries instead of directly embedding user inputs into SQL statements.
Long-Term Strategies:
- Regular Updates: Ensure that all software dependencies are regularly updated to the latest versions.
- Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits and code reviews to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
- Web Application Firewalls (WAF): Deploy WAFs to detect and block SQL injection attempts.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Immediate Impact:
- Data Breaches: Organizations using the affected version of
pg8000are at high risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. - System Compromise: Attackers can gain full control over the database and potentially the entire system, leading to significant operational disruptions.
Long-Term Impact:
- Reputation Damage: Organizations suffering from data breaches due to this vulnerability may face reputational damage and loss of customer trust.
- Increased Awareness: This vulnerability highlights the importance of secure coding practices and regular updates, potentially leading to improved security measures across the industry.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- The vulnerability exists in the
pg8000.native.literalfunction, which does not properly sanitize Python list inputs, allowing for SQL injection. - The flaw can be exploited by crafting a Python list that includes malicious SQL commands, which are then executed by the database.
Exploitation Example:
import pg8000
# Example of a vulnerable input
malicious_input = [1, 2, 3, "; DROP TABLE users; --"]
# Vulnerable function call
pg8000.native.literal(malicious_input)
Mitigation Code Example:
import pg8000
# Example of a safe input handling
safe_input = [1, 2, 3]
# Using parameterized queries
conn = pg8000.connect(user="username", password="password", database="dbname")
cursor = conn.cursor()
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM table WHERE id IN (%s, %s, %s)", safe_input)
References:
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and implementing robust security measures, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of SQL injection attacks and protect their critical data and systems.