CVE-2025-65570
CVE-2025-65570
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
A type confusion in jsish 2.0 allows incorrect control flow during execution of the OP_NEXT opcode. When an “instanceof” expression uses an array element access as the left-hand operand inside a for-in loop, the instructions implementation leaves an additional array reference on the stack rather than consuming it during OP_INSTANCEOF. As a result, OP_NEXT interprets the array as an iterator object and reads the iterCmd function pointer from an invalid structure, potentially causing a crash or enabling code execution depending on heap layout.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-65570
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2025-65570 CVSS Score: 9.8
The vulnerability in question is a type confusion issue in jsish 2.0, which can lead to incorrect control flow during the execution of the OP_NEXT opcode. This flaw arises when an "instanceof" expression uses an array element access as the left-hand operand inside a for-in loop. The incorrect handling of the array reference on the stack can cause the OP_NEXT instruction to misinterpret the array as an iterator object, leading to a crash or potential code execution.
Severity Evaluation:
- CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical)
- Impact: High
- Exploitability: High
The high CVSS score indicates a critical vulnerability that can be easily exploited and has severe consequences, including potential remote code execution (RCE).
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Remote Code Execution (RCE): An attacker could craft a malicious script that exploits the type confusion to execute arbitrary code on the target system.
- Denial of Service (DoS): The vulnerability can be exploited to cause a crash, leading to a denial of service.
- Memory Corruption: The incorrect control flow can lead to memory corruption, which can be leveraged for further exploitation.
Exploitation Methods:
- Crafted Scripts: An attacker can create a script that includes the specific "instanceof" expression within a for-in loop to trigger the vulnerability.
- Heap Spraying: By manipulating the heap layout, an attacker can increase the likelihood of successful code execution.
- Fuzzing: Automated fuzzing techniques can be used to identify and exploit the type confusion issue.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- jsish 2.0
Affected Systems:
- Any system running jsish 2.0, including web servers, application servers, and client-side applications that use this JavaScript engine.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Patching: Apply the latest security patches provided by the jsish maintainers as soon as they are available.
- Input Validation: Implement strict input validation to prevent malicious scripts from being executed.
- Sandboxing: Run jsish in a sandboxed environment to limit the impact of potential exploits.
- Monitoring: Increase monitoring and logging to detect any unusual activity that may indicate an exploitation attempt.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review to identify and fix similar type confusion issues.
- Security Training: Provide security training for developers to understand and avoid common vulnerabilities.
- Regular Updates: Ensure that all software components are regularly updated to the latest versions.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
The discovery of CVE-2025-65570 highlights the importance of rigorous code review and testing, especially in JavaScript engines and interpreters. The potential for RCE and memory corruption underscores the need for robust security measures in software development and deployment. This vulnerability serves as a reminder that even well-established software can have critical flaws that require immediate attention.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- Type Confusion: The root cause is a type confusion issue where the OP_NEXT opcode misinterprets an array as an iterator object.
- Control Flow: The incorrect control flow during the execution of the OP_NEXT opcode can lead to reading from an invalid structure.
- Heap Layout: The exploitability depends on the heap layout, which can be manipulated by an attacker to achieve code execution.
Detection and Response:
- Static Analysis: Use static analysis tools to detect type confusion issues in the codebase.
- Dynamic Analysis: Employ dynamic analysis and fuzzing to identify and validate the vulnerability.
- Incident Response: Develop an incident response plan that includes steps for detecting, containing, and remediating the vulnerability.
References:
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and comprehensively, organizations can mitigate the risk of exploitation and ensure the security of their systems.