CVE-2026-1162
CVE-2026-1162
CVSS Vector
v4.0- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Attack Requirements
- None
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (Vulnerable)
- High
- Integrity (Vulnerable)
- High
- Availability (Vulnerable)
- High
- Confidentiality (Subsequent)
- None
- Integrity (Subsequent)
- None
- Availability (Subsequent)
- None
Description
A flaw has been found in UTT HiPER 810 1.7.4-141218. The impacted element is the function strcpy of the file /goform/setSysAdm. This manipulation of the argument passwd1 causes buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2026-1162
CVE ID: CVE-2026-1162 CVSS Score: 9.8 (Critical) Affected Software: UTT HiPER 810 (Firmware Version 1.7.4-141218) Vulnerability Type: Buffer Overflow (Stack-Based) Exploitation Vector: Remote (Network-Based) Disclosure Status: Publicly Exploited (PoC Available)
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Technical Root Cause
CVE-2026-1162 is a classic stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the /goform/setSysAdm endpoint of the UTT HiPER 810 router firmware. The flaw stems from the unsafe use of the strcpy() function, which does not perform bounds checking when copying user-supplied input (passwd1 parameter) into a fixed-size buffer.
- Vulnerable Code Path:
char dest_buffer[64]; // Fixed-size buffer strcpy(dest_buffer, user_controlled_passwd1); // No length validation - Exploitation Condition: An attacker can craft an input exceeding the buffer size (e.g., >64 bytes), leading to stack corruption, return address overwrite, and arbitrary code execution (ACE).
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.8)
| CVSS Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely over the network. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None (N) | No authentication needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | Exploitable without user interaction. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged (U) | Affects the vulnerable component only. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High (H) | Full system compromise possible. |
| Integrity (I) | High (H) | Arbitrary code execution enables data tampering. |
| Availability (A) | High (H) | Denial-of-service (DoS) or persistent backdoor possible. |
Resulting CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (9.8 Critical)
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Prerequisites
- Network Access: The attacker must have network-level access to the target device (LAN or WAN, depending on router configuration).
- No Authentication: The vulnerability is exploitable without credentials.
- Public PoC Available: A proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit has been published, lowering the barrier to entry for attackers.
Exploitation Workflow
-
Reconnaissance:
- Identify vulnerable UTT HiPER 810 routers via:
- Shodan (
http.title:"UTT HiPER 810") - Masscan/Nmap (
http-fingerprintfor/goform/setSysAdm) - Default credentials (if enabled).
- Shodan (
- Identify vulnerable UTT HiPER 810 routers via:
-
Crafting the Exploit:
-
Payload Structure:
- Junk Data (64+ bytes): Fills the buffer until the return address.
- Return Address Overwrite: Redirects execution to attacker-controlled memory (e.g., stack or heap).
- Shellcode: Executes arbitrary commands (e.g., reverse shell, firmware modification).
-
Example PoC (Conceptual):
import requests target = "http://<router_ip>/goform/setSysAdm" payload = "A" * 72 + "\xef\xbe\xad\xde" + "\x90" * 100 + shellcode data = {"passwd1": payload, "passwd2": "dummy"} requests.post(target, data=data)
-
-
Post-Exploitation:
- Privilege Escalation: Gain root access (default firmware runs as root).
- Persistence: Modify firmware or install backdoors.
- Lateral Movement: Pivot to internal networks.
- Data Exfiltration: Steal credentials, logs, or sensitive configurations.
Attack Scenarios
| Scenario | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Remote Code Execution (RCE) | Attacker gains full control over the router. | Complete system compromise. |
| Denial-of-Service (DoS) | Crash the device by corrupting the stack. | Network outage. |
| Botnet Recruitment | Enlist the router in a DDoS botnet (e.g., Mirai variant). | Amplification attacks. |
| Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) | Redirect traffic to malicious servers. | Credential theft, session hijacking. |
| Firmware Tampering | Replace legitimate firmware with a backdoored version. | Long-term persistence. |
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Vulnerable Product
- Device: UTT HiPER 810 (Small Business/Enterprise Router)
- Firmware Version: 1.7.4-141218 (and likely earlier versions)
- End-of-Life (EOL) Status: Unknown; vendor response pending.
Potential Impact Scope
- Geographic Distribution: Global (common in SMBs, ISP deployments).
- Exposure Risk:
- Default Configurations: Many routers are deployed with default credentials (
admin:admin). - WAN Accessibility: If remote administration is enabled, exploitation is possible from the internet.
- Lack of Auto-Updates: Many SMB routers lack automated patching mechanisms.
- Default Configurations: Many routers are deployed with default credentials (
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions (Short-Term)
| Mitigation | Implementation | Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|
| Disable Remote Administration | Disable WAN-side admin access via router settings. | High (blocks external exploitation). |
| Change Default Credentials | Replace default admin:admin with a strong password. | Medium (prevents trivial access). |
| Network Segmentation | Isolate the router in a DMZ or separate VLAN. | Medium (limits lateral movement). |
| Firewall Rules | Block access to /goform/setSysAdm from untrusted networks. | High (if properly configured). |
| Disable Unused Services | Turn off UPnP, Telnet, and other unnecessary services. | Medium (reduces attack surface). |
Long-Term Remediation (Vendor-Dependent)
| Action | Details |
|---|---|
| Firmware Update | Apply the latest patched firmware (if available). Monitor UTT’s official channels. |
| Vendor Contact | Request a security advisory or patch from UTT (support@utt.com.cn). |
| Third-Party Firmware | Consider OpenWRT/DD-WRT if the vendor is unresponsive (risk of bricking). |
| Replace EOL Devices | If no patch is available, replace the router with a supported model. |
Detection & Monitoring
- IDS/IPS Rules:
- Snort/Suricata rule to detect buffer overflow attempts:
alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 80 (msg:"CVE-2026-1162 Buffer Overflow Attempt"; flow:to_server,established; content:"/goform/setSysAdm"; nocase; content:"passwd1="; nocase; pcre:"/passwd1=[^\x00]{70,}/"; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
- Snort/Suricata rule to detect buffer overflow attempts:
- Log Monitoring:
- Watch for repeated failed login attempts or unusual POST requests to
/goform/setSysAdm.
- Watch for repeated failed login attempts or unusual POST requests to
- Network Traffic Analysis:
- Detect anomalous outbound connections (e.g., reverse shells).
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
Exploitation in the Wild:
- Given the public PoC and CVSS 9.8 rating, this vulnerability is highly likely to be weaponized by:
- Cybercriminals (botnets, ransomware delivery).
- State-Sponsored Actors (espionage, supply chain attacks).
- Script Kiddies (due to low exploitation complexity).
- Given the public PoC and CVSS 9.8 rating, this vulnerability is highly likely to be weaponized by:
-
Supply Chain Risks:
- UTT routers are used in SMBs, ISPs, and enterprise branches, making them attractive targets for:
- Initial Access Brokers (IABs) selling access to compromised networks.
- APT Groups leveraging routers for persistent access.
- UTT routers are used in SMBs, ISPs, and enterprise branches, making them attractive targets for:
-
IoT & Router Security Challenges:
- Highlights persistent issues in embedded device security:
- Lack of Secure Coding Practices (
strcpyinstead ofstrncpyorsnprintf). - Slow Patch Cycles (many routers remain unpatched for years).
- Default Credential Problems (hardcoded or weak passwords).
- Lack of Secure Coding Practices (
- Highlights persistent issues in embedded device security:
-
Regulatory & Compliance Impact:
- GDPR/CCPA: Unauthorized access could lead to data breaches, triggering reporting requirements.
- NIS2 Directive (EU): Critical infrastructure operators must patch within strict timelines.
- FTC Safeguards Rule (US): Financial institutions must secure routers handling customer data.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Deep Dive: Exploitation Mechanics
1. Vulnerable Function Analysis
- Location:
/goform/setSysAdm(HTTP POST handler). - Vulnerable Code (Decompiled):
int setSysAdm() { char passwd1[64]; // Stack-allocated buffer char passwd2[64]; strcpy(passwd1, web_get("passwd1")); // Unsafe copy strcpy(passwd2, web_get("passwd2")); if (strcmp(passwd1, passwd2) == 0) { save_password(passwd1); } return 0; } - Stack Layout (Before Overflow):
[ passwd1 (64 bytes) ][ passwd2 (64 bytes) ][ Saved EBP (4 bytes) ][ Return Address (4 bytes) ] - Overflow Condition:
- If
passwd1exceeds 64 bytes, it overwritespasswd2, saved EBP, and the return address.
- If
2. Exploit Development Steps
- Determine Buffer Size:
- Fuzz the
passwd1parameter to identify the crash point (e.g., 72 bytes overwrites the return address).
- Fuzz the
- Control EIP:
- Replace the return address with a JMP ESP or ROP gadget address.
- Shellcode Placement:
- Use NOP sleds (
\x90) and encoded shellcode (e.g.,msfvenom -p linux/mipsle/reverse_tcp).
- Use NOP sleds (
- Bypass ASLR/DEP:
- If enabled, use Return-Oriented Programming (ROP) to bypass protections.
3. Post-Exploitation Considerations
- Architecture: UTT HiPER 810 runs on MIPS (little-endian).
- Shellcode Requirements:
- Must be MIPS-compatible (e.g.,
msfvenom -p linux/mipsle/shell_reverse_tcp).
- Must be MIPS-compatible (e.g.,
- Persistence Mechanisms:
- Modify
/etc/passwdor/etc/init.d/rc.local. - Flash a custom firmware image.
- Modify
Reverse Engineering & Forensics
- Firmware Extraction:
- Use
binwalkto extract the firmware:binwalk -e UTT_HiPER_810_1.7.4-141218.bin
- Use
- Binary Analysis:
- Use Ghidra or IDA Pro to analyze the
setSysAdmfunction. - Identify hardcoded credentials or backdoor accounts.
- Use Ghidra or IDA Pro to analyze the
- Memory Forensics:
- If a device is compromised, dump memory using:
cat /proc/kcore > memory_dump.bin - Analyze with Volatility (if a Linux-based system).
- If a device is compromised, dump memory using:
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Analysis
- Public PoC (GitHub):
- The referenced PoC (cha0yang1/UTT810) likely includes:
- A Python script to trigger the overflow.
- MIPS shellcode for reverse shell.
- ROP chain (if ASLR is enabled).
- The referenced PoC (cha0yang1/UTT810) likely includes:
- Detection Evasion:
- Attackers may obfuscate payloads (e.g., URL encoding, chunked transfer encoding).
Conclusion & Recommendations
Key Takeaways
- Critical Severity: CVE-2026-1162 is a high-impact, easily exploitable vulnerability with public PoC.
- Widespread Risk: Affects SMBs, ISPs, and enterprises using UTT HiPER 810 routers.
- Active Exploitation Likely: Given the CVSS 9.8 score, immediate action is required.
Action Plan for Organizations
- Isolate & Patch:
- Identify all UTT HiPER 810 devices in the network.
- Apply vendor patches immediately (if available).
- Monitor & Detect:
- Deploy IDS/IPS rules to detect exploitation attempts.
- Monitor for unusual outbound connections (e.g., reverse shells).
- Long-Term Security:
- Replace EOL devices if no patch is forthcoming.
- Enforce network segmentation to limit lateral movement.
- Conduct a firmware security audit for other embedded devices.
Vendor & Community Response
- UTT: Should release an emergency patch and issue a security advisory.
- CERT/CSIRTs: Should track exploitation and issue alerts to affected organizations.
- Security Researchers: Continue reverse engineering to identify additional vulnerabilities.
Final Risk Assessment
| Factor | Risk Level | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Exploitability | Critical | Public PoC, no auth required. |
| Impact | Critical | Full system compromise. |
| Patch Availability | Unknown | Vendor response pending. |
| Exploitation in Wild | High | Likely already occurring. |
| Mitigation Feasibility | Medium | Requires manual intervention. |
Overall Risk: CRITICAL (Immediate Action Required)
References: