CVE-2026-1568
CVE-2026-1568
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- Low
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Description
Rapid7 InsightVM versions before 8.34.0 contain a signature verification issue on the Assertion Consumer Service (ACS) cloud endpoint that could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to InsightVM accounts setup via "Security Console" installations, resulting in full account takeover. The issue occurs due to the application processing these unsigned assertions and issuing session cookies that granted access to the targeted user accounts. This has been fixed in version 8.34.0 of InsightVM.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2026-1568
CVE ID: CVE-2026-1568 CVSS Score: 9.6 (Critical) Vulnerability Type: Authentication Bypass via Unsigned SAML Assertions Affected Software: Rapid7 InsightVM (versions prior to 8.34.0) CWE Classification: CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Technical Overview
CVE-2026-1568 is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightVM’s Assertion Consumer Service (ACS) cloud endpoint, stemming from improper SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) signature verification. The flaw allows an attacker to forge unsigned SAML assertions, which the application processes as valid, leading to unauthorized session cookie issuance and full account takeover of InsightVM user accounts configured via the "Security Console."
Severity Justification (CVSS 9.6)
The CVSS v3.1 scoring breakdown is as follows:
| Metric | Value | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network | Exploitable remotely over the internet. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low | No specialized conditions required; SAML assertions can be crafted with minimal effort. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None | No prior authentication or privileges needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None | Exploitation does not require victim interaction. |
| Scope (S) | Changed | Compromises the security of the InsightVM platform, affecting all linked accounts. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High | Full account takeover grants access to sensitive vulnerability data, scan results, and administrative functions. |
| Integrity (I) | High | Attacker can modify configurations, delete data, or execute unauthorized actions. |
| Availability (A) | High | Potential for denial-of-service via misconfiguration or data deletion. |
Resulting CVSS Score: 9.6 (Critical)
- The vulnerability is remotely exploitable with no authentication required, making it a high-impact, high-likelihood threat.
- The scope change (from unauthenticated attacker to full account access) significantly elevates risk.
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Mechanism
The vulnerability arises from insufficient SAML assertion validation in the ACS endpoint. An attacker can exploit this by:
-
Crafting a Malicious SAML Assertion
- The attacker generates a forged SAML response (e.g., using tools like
python3-saml,Burp Suite, or custom scripts). - The assertion lacks a valid digital signature but includes a spoofed identity (e.g., a privileged InsightVM user).
- The
Assertionelement may contain:<saml:Assertion ID="..." IssueInstant="..." Version="2.0"> <saml:Issuer>https://malicious-idp.example.com</saml:Issuer> <saml:Subject> <saml:NameID Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:emailAddress"> admin@target-org.com </saml:NameID> </saml:Subject> <saml:Conditions NotBefore="..." NotOnOrAfter="..."> <saml:AudienceRestriction> <saml:Audience>https://insightvm.rapid7.com</saml:Audience> </saml:AudienceRestriction> </saml:Conditions> <saml:AuthnStatement AuthnInstant="..." SessionIndex="..."> <saml:AuthnContext> <saml:AuthnContextClassRef>urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:ac:classes:Password</saml:AuthnContextClassRef> </saml:AuthnContext> </saml:AuthnStatement> </saml:Assertion> - Key Weakness: The InsightVM ACS endpoint does not verify the cryptographic signature of the SAML assertion, allowing unsigned assertions to be accepted.
- The attacker generates a forged SAML response (e.g., using tools like
-
Submitting the Forged Assertion to the ACS Endpoint
- The attacker sends the unsigned SAML response to the InsightVM ACS URL (e.g.,
https://insightvm.rapid7.com/saml/SSO/alias/defaultAlias). - The application processes the assertion and issues a valid session cookie for the spoofed user.
- The attacker sends the unsigned SAML response to the InsightVM ACS URL (e.g.,
-
Session Hijacking & Account Takeover
- The attacker gains full access to the victim’s InsightVM account, including:
- Vulnerability scan data
- Asset inventory
- Administrative controls (if the spoofed user has elevated privileges)
- API access (if enabled)
- The attacker gains full access to the victim’s InsightVM account, including:
Attack Scenarios
| Scenario | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| External Attacker (No Prior Access) | An unauthenticated attacker crafts a SAML assertion for a known InsightVM admin email and submits it to the ACS endpoint. | Full administrative access to the InsightVM console. |
| Insider Threat (Low-Privilege User) | A malicious insider with limited access forges a SAML assertion for a higher-privileged user. | Escalation to admin privileges. |
| Phishing + SAML Forgery | An attacker sends a phishing email with a link to a malicious SAML IdP, tricking a user into authenticating and capturing the assertion. | Account takeover via stolen session. |
| Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) | If SAML traffic is intercepted (e.g., via unencrypted HTTP), an attacker modifies the assertion in transit. | Session hijacking without direct SAML forgery. |
Exploitation Tools & Techniques
- SAML Manipulation Tools:
- Burp Suite SAML Raider (for intercepting/modifying SAML traffic)
- python3-saml (for generating forged assertions)
- Custom Python scripts using
xml.etree.ElementTreeorlxmlfor SAML crafting.
- Reconnaissance:
- Identifying InsightVM instances via Shodan (
http.title:"InsightVM"). - Enumerating valid user emails via OSINT (LinkedIn, company websites, breached data dumps).
- Identifying InsightVM instances via Shodan (
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Vulnerable Versions
- Rapid7 InsightVM versions prior to 8.34.0.
- Rapid7 InsightIDR (if integrated with InsightVM) may also be indirectly affected if SAML assertions are shared.
Non-Vulnerable Versions
- InsightVM 8.34.0 and later (patched).
- On-premise deployments using local authentication (non-SAML) are not affected.
Detection Methods
- Network-Based Detection:
- Monitor for unsigned SAML assertions sent to the ACS endpoint (
/saml/SSO/alias/defaultAlias). - Alert on SAML responses lacking a
<ds:Signature>element.
- Monitor for unsigned SAML assertions sent to the ACS endpoint (
- Log-Based Detection:
- Inspect InsightVM logs for unexpected SAML authentication events (e.g., logins from unknown IdPs).
- Check for session cookies issued without prior IdP interaction.
- Endpoint Detection:
- Use EDR/XDR solutions to detect unusual InsightVM API calls post-exploitation.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
| Mitigation | Details | Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|
| Upgrade to InsightVM 8.34.0+ | Apply the latest patch from Rapid7. | High (Eliminates root cause) |
| Disable SAML Authentication | Temporarily switch to local authentication if SAML is not critical. | Medium (Workaround, not a fix) |
| Enforce SAML Signature Validation | If unable to patch, configure InsightVM to reject unsigned assertions (if supported). | Medium (May not be possible in all versions) |
| Restrict ACS Endpoint Access | Use IP whitelisting or WAF rules to limit access to the ACS URL. | Low-Medium (Does not prevent MITM or internal attacks) |
Long-Term Security Hardening
-
SAML Security Best Practices
- Enforce IdP-Signed Assertions: Ensure the IdP signs SAML responses with a strong cryptographic algorithm (e.g., RSA-SHA256).
- Validate Assertion Timestamps: Reject assertions with expired or future timestamps.
- Use Short-Lived Assertions: Configure the IdP to issue assertions with short validity periods (e.g., 5 minutes).
- Enable SAML Encryption: Encrypt SAML assertions to prevent tampering in transit.
-
Network & Access Controls
- Segment InsightVM Traffic: Restrict access to the InsightVM console and ACS endpoint via VLANs, firewalls, or zero-trust policies.
- Implement Mutual TLS (mTLS): Require client certificates for SAML authentication.
- Monitor SAML Traffic: Deploy SIEM rules to detect anomalous SAML authentication patterns.
-
User & Privilege Management
- Enforce Least Privilege: Limit InsightVM admin roles to only necessary personnel.
- Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): If SAML is used, ensure the IdP enforces MFA.
- Audit User Accounts: Regularly review InsightVM user lists for orphaned or excessive privileges.
-
Incident Response Preparedness
- Develop a SAML Compromise Playbook: Define steps for revoking sessions, rotating credentials, and investigating breaches.
- Enable Detailed Logging: Ensure InsightVM logs all SAML authentication events (including failed attempts).
- Conduct Red Team Exercises: Test SAML-based attack scenarios to validate defenses.
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications
-
Supply Chain & Third-Party Risk
- InsightVM is widely used by enterprises, MSSPs, and government agencies for vulnerability management.
- A single compromised InsightVM instance could lead to lateral movement into other security tools (e.g., SIEM, EDR) if integrations exist.
-
SAML-Based Attacks on the Rise
- This vulnerability follows a growing trend of SAML-related flaws (e.g., Golden SAML, CVE-2021-21983).
- Organizations must audit all SAML implementations for similar weaknesses.
-
Regulatory & Compliance Risks
- GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS: Unauthorized access to vulnerability data may constitute a reportable breach.
- NIST SP 800-63B: SAML implementations must enforce strong authentication and cryptographic validation.
-
Threat Actor Interest
- APT Groups & Ransomware Operators: May exploit this to disable security monitoring before deploying malware.
- Cybercriminals: Could use InsightVM access to identify unpatched systems for further exploitation.
Historical Context
- Similar Vulnerabilities:
- CVE-2021-21983 (VMware vCenter SAML Bypass) – Allowed authentication bypass via unsigned SAML assertions.
- CVE-2020-1472 (Zerologon) – Netlogon authentication bypass leading to domain takeover.
- CVE-2018-0147 (Cisco ASA SAML Bypass) – Unsigned SAML assertions granted unauthorized access.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability stems from improper SAML assertion validation in the InsightVM ACS endpoint. Specifically:
- The application fails to verify the
<ds:Signature>element in the SAML response. - The
Assertionis processed even if unsigned, leading to session cookie issuance. - The
NameIDin the assertion is used to map to an InsightVM user account, enabling impersonation.
SAML Flow Exploitation Breakdown
- Normal SAML Flow (Secure):
User → IdP (Authenticates) → IdP (Signs SAML Assertion) → SP (InsightVM ACS) → Validates Signature → Issues Session Cookie - Exploited Flow (CVE-2026-1568):
Attacker → Forges Unsigned SAML Assertion → SP (InsightVM ACS) → Skips Signature Check → Issues Session Cookie for Spoofed User
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Considerations
While a full PoC is not provided (to prevent misuse), security teams can reproduce the issue by:
- Intercepting a Legitimate SAML Response (e.g., via Burp Suite).
- Removing the
<ds:Signature>element from the assertion. - Replaying the Modified Assertion to the ACS endpoint.
- Observing Session Cookie Issuance for the spoofed user.
Detection & Forensic Analysis
- Log Indicators:
- InsightVM Authentication Logs:
[INFO] SAML Authentication Success - User: admin@target.com, IdP: https://malicious-idp.example.com - Missing Signature Warnings:
[WARN] SAML Assertion received without signature - Processing anyway (VULNERABLE)
- InsightVM Authentication Logs:
- Network Indicators:
- Unsigned SAML assertions in HTTP traffic to
/saml/SSO/alias/defaultAlias. - Unexpected SAML IdP domains in authentication logs.
- Unsigned SAML assertions in HTTP traffic to
Reverse Engineering Insights (If Applicable)
- Binary Analysis (If On-Premise):
- Inspect the InsightVM Security Console for SAML parsing logic (e.g.,
com.rapid7.saml.*). - Look for missing signature validation checks in the ACS handler.
- Inspect the InsightVM Security Console for SAML parsing logic (e.g.,
- Cloud Analysis:
- Rapid7’s cloud ACS endpoint likely failed to enforce signature validation in the SAML library (e.g., OpenSAML, Spring Security SAML).
Conclusion & Recommendations
CVE-2026-1568 represents a critical authentication bypass with severe implications for organizations using Rapid7 InsightVM. Given its CVSS 9.6 rating, remote exploitability, and potential for full account takeover, immediate action is required.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams:
✅ Patch Immediately: Upgrade to InsightVM 8.34.0+ without delay. ✅ Audit SAML Configurations: Ensure all SAML integrations enforce signature validation. ✅ Monitor for Exploitation: Deploy SIEM rules to detect unsigned SAML assertions. ✅ Enforce Least Privilege: Limit InsightVM admin access to only essential personnel. ✅ Prepare for Incident Response: Develop a SAML compromise playbook for rapid containment.
Final Risk Assessment
| Factor | Risk Level | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Exploitability | High | Remote, unauthenticated, low complexity. |
| Impact | Critical | Full account takeover, data exfiltration, lateral movement. |
| Likelihood | High | SAML attacks are well-documented and frequently exploited. |
| Mitigation Feasibility | High | Patch available; compensating controls possible. |
Overall Risk: Critical (9.6/10) – Immediate remediation is mandatory.
References: