CVE-2026-25725
CVE-2026-25725
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v4.0- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Attack Requirements
- Present
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- Passive
- Confidentiality (Vulnerable)
- High
- Integrity (Vulnerable)
- High
- Availability (Vulnerable)
- High
- Confidentiality (Subsequent)
- None
- Integrity (Subsequent)
- None
- Availability (Subsequent)
- None
Description
Claude Code is an agentic coding tool. Prior to version 2.1.2, Claude Code's bubblewrap sandboxing mechanism failed to properly protect the .claude/settings.json configuration file when it did not exist at startup. While the parent directory was mounted as writable and .claude/settings.local.json was explicitly protected with read-only constraints, settings.json was not protected if it was missing. This allowed malicious code running inside the sandbox to create this file and inject persistent hooks (such as SessionStart commands) that would execute with host privileges when Claude Code was restarted. This issue has been patched in version 2.1.2.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2026-25725
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Description:
CVE-2026-25725 affects Claude Code, an agentic coding tool, prior to version 2.1.2. The vulnerability arises from a flaw in the bubblewrap sandboxing mechanism, which fails to protect the .claude/settings.json configuration file if it does not exist at startup. This oversight allows malicious code running inside the sandbox to create this file and inject persistent hooks, such as SessionStart commands, that execute with host privileges upon restarting Claude Code.
Severity Evaluation: The CVSS score of 10 indicates a critical vulnerability. This high score is justified by the potential for privilege escalation and persistent malicious actions, which can severely compromise the integrity and security of the host system.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Malicious Code Execution: An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious code into the sandbox environment. This code could then create the
.claude/settings.jsonfile with malicious hooks. - Persistent Hooks: The injected hooks, such as SessionStart commands, would execute with host privileges upon restarting Claude Code, allowing the attacker to maintain persistent access and control over the system.
Exploitation Methods:
- Code Injection: The attacker could inject code that creates the
.claude/settings.jsonfile with malicious configurations. - Privilege Escalation: By exploiting the vulnerability, the attacker could escalate privileges from the sandbox to the host system, gaining unauthorized access to sensitive data and system resources.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Systems:
- Systems running Claude Code versions prior to 2.1.2.
- Environments where Claude Code is used for coding tasks, including development, testing, and production environments.
Software Versions:
- Claude Code versions prior to 2.1.2.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Upgrade to Version 2.1.2: Ensure that all instances of Claude Code are upgraded to version 2.1.2 or later, which includes the patch for this vulnerability.
- Monitor for Unauthorized Changes: Implement monitoring to detect any unauthorized changes to the
.claude/settings.jsonfile. - Restrict Sandbox Permissions: Enforce strict permissions on the sandbox environment to limit the actions that can be performed by code running within it.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of sandboxing mechanisms and configuration files to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.
- Least Privilege Principle: Apply the principle of least privilege to ensure that sandboxed code has the minimum necessary permissions.
- Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): Deploy IDS to detect and respond to any suspicious activities within the sandbox environment.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Immediate Impact:
- Privilege Escalation: The vulnerability allows attackers to escalate privileges from the sandbox to the host system, posing a significant risk to system integrity and security.
- Persistent Threats: The ability to inject persistent hooks can lead to long-term compromises, making it difficult to detect and remediate the threat.
Long-Term Impact:
- Increased Awareness: This vulnerability highlights the importance of robust sandboxing mechanisms and the need for thorough security testing of configuration files.
- Enhanced Security Measures: Organizations may adopt more stringent security measures for sandbox environments and configuration management to prevent similar vulnerabilities in the future.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Technical Analysis:
- Sandbox Mechanism: The bubblewrap sandboxing mechanism in Claude Code is designed to isolate code execution from the host system. However, the flaw in protecting the
.claude/settings.jsonfile allows for privilege escalation. - Configuration File Protection: The parent directory is mounted as writable, and
.claude/settings.local.jsonis protected with read-only constraints. However,settings.jsonis not protected if it is missing, leading to the vulnerability. - Patch Details: The patch in version 2.1.2 ensures that the
.claude/settings.jsonfile is protected with read-only constraints, preventing unauthorized creation and modification.
Detection and Response:
- File Integrity Monitoring: Implement file integrity monitoring to detect any unauthorized changes to the
.claude/settings.jsonfile. - Log Analysis: Analyze logs for any suspicious activities within the sandbox environment, such as attempts to create or modify configuration files.
- Incident Response Plan: Develop and maintain an incident response plan to quickly address any detected vulnerabilities or compromises.
Conclusion: CVE-2026-25725 represents a critical vulnerability in Claude Code that underscores the importance of robust sandboxing and configuration file protection. Organizations should prioritize upgrading to the patched version and implementing additional security measures to mitigate the risk of similar vulnerabilities in the future.