CVE-2026-28391
CVE-2026-28391
Weakness (CWE)
CVSS Vector
v4.0- Attack Vector
- Network
- Attack Complexity
- Low
- Attack Requirements
- Present
- Privileges Required
- None
- User Interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (Vulnerable)
- High
- Integrity (Vulnerable)
- High
- Availability (Vulnerable)
- High
- Confidentiality (Subsequent)
- None
- Integrity (Subsequent)
- None
- Availability (Subsequent)
- None
Description
OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.2 fail to properly validate Windows cmd.exe metacharacters in allowlist-gated exec requests (non-default configuration), allowing attackers to bypass command approval restrictions. Remote attackers can craft command strings with shell metacharacters like & or %...% to execute unapproved commands beyond the allowlisted operations.
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of CVE-2026-28391
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVE ID: CVE-2026-28391
Description: OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.2 contain a vulnerability where Windows cmd.exe metacharacters are not properly validated in allowlist-gated exec requests. This flaw allows attackers to bypass command approval restrictions by crafting command strings with shell metacharacters like & or %...%, enabling the execution of unapproved commands.
CVSS Score: 9.8
Severity Evaluation:
- Critical: The high CVSS score of 9.8 indicates a critical vulnerability. This score reflects the potential for remote code execution, which can lead to significant security breaches.
- Impact: The vulnerability can result in unauthorized command execution, leading to data breaches, system compromise, and potential lateral movement within the network.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Remote Exploitation: Attackers can exploit this vulnerability remotely by sending crafted command strings to the affected system.
- Command Injection: By leveraging shell metacharacters, attackers can inject additional commands that bypass the allowlist, executing arbitrary commands on the system.
Exploitation Methods:
- Metacharacter Injection: Attackers can use metacharacters like
&,|,&&,||, and%...%to chain commands or execute additional commands. - Command Chaining: For example, an attacker could send a command like
echo Hello & del importantfile.txtto execute thedelcommand afterecho.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- OpenClaw versions prior to 2026.2.2
Systems:
- Any system running the affected versions of OpenClaw, particularly those that rely on Windows
cmd.exefor command execution.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions:
- Upgrade: Upgrade to OpenClaw version 2026.2.2 or later, which includes the fix for this vulnerability.
- Patch Management: Ensure that all systems are regularly updated and patched to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
Long-Term Strategies:
- Input Validation: Implement robust input validation to sanitize and validate all command inputs.
- Allowlist Enforcement: Strengthen allowlist enforcement mechanisms to prevent unauthorized command execution.
- Monitoring and Logging: Enhance monitoring and logging to detect and respond to suspicious command execution activities.
5. Impact on Cybersecurity Landscape
Broader Implications:
- Widespread Adoption: Given the widespread use of OpenClaw, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to organizations relying on it for command execution.
- Supply Chain Risks: Organizations that integrate OpenClaw into their supply chain or use it as part of their DevOps pipeline are particularly at risk.
- Compliance and Regulation: This vulnerability highlights the importance of compliance with security standards and regulations, particularly in industries with stringent data protection requirements.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- Root Cause: The vulnerability arises from insufficient validation of Windows
cmd.exemetacharacters in allowlist-gated exec requests. - Exploitation: Attackers can exploit this by crafting command strings that include metacharacters to bypass the allowlist and execute unapproved commands.
Mitigation Steps:
- Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review to identify and fix similar validation issues in other parts of the codebase.
- Security Testing: Implement automated security testing to detect and prevent command injection vulnerabilities.
- User Education: Educate users and administrators about the risks of command injection and the importance of input validation.
References:
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and implementing robust security measures, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of exploitation and enhance their overall cybersecurity posture.