Description
CryptoES is a cryptography algorithms library compatible with ES6 and TypeScript. Prior to version 2.1.0, CryptoES PBKDF2 is 1,000 times weaker than originally specified in 1993, and at least 1,300,000 times weaker than current industry standard. This is because it both defaults to SHA1, a cryptographic hash algorithm considered insecure since at least 2005, and defaults to one single iteration, a 'strength' or 'difficulty' value specified at 1,000 when specified in 1993. PBKDF2 relies on iteration count as a countermeasure to preimage and collision attacks. If used to protect passwords, the impact is high. If used to generate signatures, the impact is high. Version 2.1.0 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, configure CryptoES to use SHA256 with at least 250,000 iterations.
EPSS Score:
0%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2023-2777
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Description: The vulnerability affects the CryptoES library, specifically its implementation of the PBKDF2 (Password-Based Key Derivation Function 2) algorithm. Prior to version 2.1.0, the library defaults to using SHA1 with a single iteration, which is significantly weaker than the industry standard. This weakness can be exploited to compromise passwords and signatures protected by the algorithm.
Severity Evaluation:
- Base Score: 9.1 (CVSS:3.1)
- Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
The high base score indicates a critical vulnerability. The attack vector (AV:N) is network-based, requiring low attack complexity (AC:L) and no privileges (PR:N) or user interaction (UI:N). The scope is unchanged (S:U), but the confidentiality (C:H) and integrity (I:H) impacts are high, while availability (A:N) is not affected.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Password Cracking: An attacker could exploit the weak PBKDF2 implementation to crack passwords stored using CryptoES. The use of SHA1 and a single iteration makes brute-force attacks feasible.
- Signature Forgery: If CryptoES is used to generate signatures, an attacker could forge signatures due to the weak cryptographic strength, leading to unauthorized actions.
Exploitation Methods:
- Brute-Force Attacks: Utilize computational resources to guess passwords protected by the weak PBKDF2 implementation.
- Preimage and Collision Attacks: Exploit the weaknesses in SHA1 to find collisions or preimages, which can be used to forge signatures or compromise data integrity.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- CryptoES Library: Versions prior to 2.1.0
Affected Systems:
- Any system or application that uses the CryptoES library for cryptographic operations, particularly those involving password storage or signature generation.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Upgrade: Upgrade to CryptoES version 2.1.0 or later, which contains a patch for this issue.
- Configuration: If upgrading is not immediately possible, configure CryptoES to use SHA256 with at least 250,000 iterations.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Regular Audits: Conduct regular security audits of cryptographic libraries and configurations.
- Best Practices: Follow industry best practices for cryptographic implementations, including using strong hash functions and appropriate iteration counts.
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
Impact Analysis:
- Data Breaches: Increased risk of data breaches due to compromised passwords.
- Unauthorized Access: Potential for unauthorized access to systems and data protected by weak cryptographic implementations.
- Compliance Issues: Non-compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR, leading to potential legal and financial repercussions.
Regulatory Implications:
- GDPR Compliance: Organizations must ensure that personal data is protected using adequate cryptographic measures to avoid fines and legal actions.
- Cybersecurity Directives: Compliance with EU cybersecurity directives and guidelines is essential to maintain trust and security within the European digital ecosystem.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Technical Analysis:
- PBKDF2 Weakness: The default use of SHA1 and a single iteration significantly reduces the computational effort required to crack passwords or forge signatures.
- SHA1 Vulnerabilities: SHA1 has been considered insecure since 2005 due to its susceptibility to collision attacks, which can be exploited to compromise data integrity.
Mitigation Steps:
- Update CryptoES: Ensure all systems using CryptoES are updated to version 2.1.0 or later.
- Configure Strong Parameters: If updating is not possible, configure CryptoES to use SHA256 with at least 250,000 iterations.
- Monitor and Audit: Continuously monitor and audit cryptographic implementations to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities promptly.
References:
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and thoroughly, organizations can enhance their cybersecurity posture and protect against potential attacks.