Description
Tenda AC5 US_AC5V1.0RTL_V15.03.06.28 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the fromSetSysTime function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted payload.
EPSS Score:
1%
EUVD-2023-29173: Professional Cybersecurity Analysis
Executive Summary
EUVD-2023-29173 (CVE-2023-25210) represents a critical severity stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Tenda AC5 wireless routers. With a CVSS v3.1 score of 9.8/10, this vulnerability poses an immediate and severe threat to affected systems, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service conditions.
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Severity Classification
- CVSS v3.1 Base Score: 9.8 (CRITICAL)
- EPSS Score: 1 (indicating active exploitation or high exploitation probability)
- Attack Complexity: Low
- Privileges Required: None
- User Interaction: None
Technical Characteristics
Vulnerability Type: Stack-based Buffer Overflow
Affected Function: fromSetSysTime
Root Cause: Insufficient input validation and boundary checking in the system time configuration function, allowing attackers to overflow stack-allocated buffers with crafted payloads.
Severity Justification
The maximum severity rating is warranted due to:
- Network-based exploitation (AV:N) - Remotely exploitable without physical access
- No authentication required (PR:N) - Exploitable by anonymous attackers
- No user interaction (UI:N) - Fully automated exploitation possible
- Complete system compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H) - Full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact
- EPSS score of 1 - Indicates active exploitation in the wild or extremely high likelihood
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Primary Attack Vectors
A. Direct Web Interface Exploitation
- Target: Router's administrative web interface
- Method: Malicious HTTP/HTTPS requests to the time configuration endpoint
- Authentication: Not required (pre-authentication vulnerability)
- Network Position: Accessible from LAN or WAN if remote management is enabled
B. Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Chain
- Method: Social engineering to trick authenticated administrators into visiting malicious websites
- Payload Delivery: Automated POST requests to vulnerable endpoint
- Advantage: Bypasses network-level restrictions
C. Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks
- Scenario: Compromised network infrastructure
- Method: Injection of malicious payloads into legitimate traffic
- Target Environment: Public Wi-Fi, compromised ISP infrastructure
Exploitation Methodology
Attack Flow:
1. Reconnaissance → Identify Tenda AC5 devices (firmware version enumeration)
2. Payload Crafting → Create buffer overflow exploit targeting fromSetSysTime
3. Delivery → Send crafted request to vulnerable endpoint
4. Exploitation → Overflow stack buffer, overwrite return address
5. Code Execution → Execute shellcode/payload with router privileges
6. Post-Exploitation → Establish persistence, pivot to internal network
Exploitation Complexity
Technical Difficulty: Low to Moderate
- Public proof-of-concept available (GitHub reference)
- Stack-based overflows are well-understood
- ASLR/DEP may not be implemented on embedded devices
- Potential for automated exploitation tools
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Confirmed Affected Products
Manufacturer: Tenda Technology Co., Ltd.
Product Line: AC5 Wireless Router (US Market)
Specific Version:
- Model: US_AC5V1.0RTL
- Firmware Version: V15.03.06.28
- Release Date: June 28, 2015 (based on version nomenclature)
Potentially Affected Systems
Given common firmware sharing practices among router manufacturers:
-
Other Tenda AC5 Regional Variants
- EU, Asia-Pacific versions may share codebase
- Different model suffixes (AC5V2.0, AC5V3.0)
-
Related Tenda Product Lines
- AC6, AC7, AC9 series (if sharing common firmware base)
- Other routers using similar SDK/development framework
-
OEM/White-Label Products
- Devices manufactured by Tenda but branded differently
- ISP-provided routers based on Tenda hardware
Identification Methods
Version Detection:
- Web Interface: System Settings → Firmware Version
- HTTP Headers: Server response may include firmware information
- UPnP Discovery: Device description may reveal model/version
- Shodan/Censys: Internet-wide scanning for exposed devices
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions (Priority 1)
A. Firmware Updates
- Action: Check for and apply latest firmware from Tenda official sources
- Verification: Confirm patch addresses CVE-2023-25210
- Timeline: Implement within 24-48 hours
- Challenge: Vendor may not provide updates for EOL products
B. Network Isolation
Firewall Rules:
- Block external access to router management interface (ports 80, 443, 8080)
- Restrict management access to specific trusted IP addresses
- Disable WAN-side administration completely
- Implement VLAN segmentation for IoT devices
C. Access Control Hardening
- Change default administrative credentials immediately
- Implement strong passwords (16+ characters, complex)
- Disable remote management features
- Enable HTTPS-only administration if available
Short-Term Mitigations (Priority 2)
D. Network Monitoring
Detection Signatures:
- Monitor for unusual POST requests to time configuration endpoints
- Alert on abnormal payload sizes in router management traffic
- Log all administrative access attempts
- Implement IDS/IPS rules for known exploit patterns
E. Compensating Controls
- Deploy network-based firewall in front of vulnerable devices
- Implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules
- Use VPN for all administrative access
- Enable audit logging and centralized log collection
Long-Term Strategies (Priority 3)
F. Device Replacement
- Recommendation: Replace affected devices with supported, actively maintained alternatives
- Justification: Tenda's security track record and EOL support concerns
- Timeline: 3-6 month replacement cycle
- Alternatives: Enterprise-grade routers with regular security updates
G. Security Architecture Improvements
Defense-in-Depth Approach:
1. Network Segmentation: Separate IoT/guest networks from critical systems
2. Zero Trust Model: Assume breach, implement micro-segmentation
3. Continuous Monitoring: Deploy SIEM for threat detection
4. Incident Response: Develop playbooks for IoT compromise scenarios
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory Implications
A. NIS2 Directive Compliance
- Relevance: Critical infrastructure operators using affected devices face compliance risks
- Requirements: Incident reporting obligations if exploitation detected
- Timeline: Member states must transpose by October 2024
- Action: Inventory and remediate vulnerable devices in essential services
B. GDPR Considerations
- Data Protection Risk: Router compromise may expose personal data in transit
- Controller Obligations: Organizations must implement appropriate technical measures
- Breach Notification: 72-hour reporting requirement if personal data compromised
- Penalties: Up to €20 million or 4% of global turnover
C. Radio Equipment Directive (RED)
- Cybersecurity Requirements: Article 3(3)(d) mandates network security protections
- Manufacturer Obligations: Tenda's responsibility to address vulnerabilities
- Market Surveillance: National authorities may take enforcement action
Sector-Specific Impacts
Critical Infrastructure
- Energy Sector: SCADA network exposure if routers used in operational technology
- Healthcare: Patient data confidentiality risks in medical facilities
- Financial Services: PCI-DSS compliance violations if payment networks affected
Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
- Prevalence: Tenda devices common in cost-conscious SME deployments
- Resource Constraints: Limited security expertise for remediation
- Supply Chain Risk: Compromised SMEs as pivot points to larger organizations
Residential Users
- Consumer Protection: