Description
Dataease is an open source data visualization and analysis tool. The blacklist for SQL injection protection is missing entries. This vulnerability has been fixed in version 1.18.5. There are no known workarounds.
EPSS Score:
1%
EUVD-2023-32126: Professional Cybersecurity Analysis
Executive Summary
Vulnerability Classification: SQL Injection (CWE-89)
Severity: CRITICAL (CVSS 9.8)
Status: Patched (v1.18.5)
Threat Level: High - Active exploitation likely given EPSS score of 1.0
This vulnerability represents a critical SQL injection flaw in Dataease, an open-source data visualization platform, resulting from incomplete blacklist-based input validation mechanisms.
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
CVSS 3.1 Analysis (9.8 - Critical)
Vector Breakdown:
- AV:N (Attack Vector: Network) - Remotely exploitable via network access
- AC:L (Attack Complexity: Low) - No specialized conditions required
- PR:N (Privileges Required: None) - No authentication needed
- UI:N (User Interaction: None) - Fully automated exploitation possible
- S:U (Scope: Unchanged) - Impact limited to vulnerable component
- C:H/I:H/A:H - Complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability
Severity Justification
The 9.8 CVSS score is warranted due to:
- Unauthenticated remote exploitation - Attackers require no credentials
- Trivial exploitation complexity - Blacklist bypasses are well-documented
- Complete system compromise potential - Full CIA triad impact
- EPSS score of 1.0 - Maximum exploitation probability, indicating active or imminent exploitation in the wild
Technical Root Cause
The vulnerability stems from incomplete blacklist-based SQL injection protection. Blacklist approaches are inherently flawed because:
- Attackers can use encoding techniques (URL encoding, Unicode, hex)
- Alternative SQL syntax and database-specific functions bypass filters
- Case variations and whitespace manipulation evade detection
- New attack vectors emerge that aren't on the blacklist
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Primary Attack Vectors
A. Direct SQL Injection via User Input Fields
-- Potential exploitation through data visualization parameters
' OR '1'='1' --
'; DROP TABLE users; --
' UNION SELECT username, password FROM admin_users --
B. Second-Order SQL Injection
- Malicious data stored in database
- Executed when retrieved and used in subsequent queries
- Particularly dangerous in data analysis contexts
C. Blind SQL Injection
-- Time-based blind injection
' AND IF(1=1, SLEEP(5), 0) --
-- Boolean-based blind injection
' AND (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM information_schema.tables) > 0 --
Exploitation Methodology
Phase 1: Reconnaissance
- Identify Dataease installations (Shodan, Censys)
- Version fingerprinting via HTTP headers or error messages
- Identify vulnerable endpoints (data query interfaces, dashboard parameters)
Phase 2: Blacklist Bypass Techniques
-- Encoding bypass
%27%20OR%20%271%27%3D%271
-- Case manipulation
' oR '1'='1
-- Comment obfuscation
'/**/OR/**/1=1--
-- Alternative operators
' || '1'='1
Phase 3: Data Exfiltration
-- Database enumeration
' UNION SELECT schema_name FROM information_schema.schemata --
-- Credential harvesting
' UNION SELECT username, password FROM users --
-- Sensitive data extraction
' UNION SELECT column_name, data_type FROM information_schema.columns --
Phase 4: Post-Exploitation
- Privilege escalation via database functions
- File system access (MySQL: LOAD_FILE, INTO OUTFILE)
- Remote code execution through database-specific features
- Lateral movement to connected systems
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Versions
- Dataease versions < 1.18.5
- All installations prior to March 24, 2023 patch release
Deployment Contexts at Risk
Enterprise Environments:
- Business intelligence platforms
- Data analytics dashboards
- Executive reporting systems
- Customer-facing analytics portals
Infrastructure Components:
- Docker containerized deployments
- Kubernetes orchestrated instances
- Cloud-hosted installations (AWS, Azure, GCP)
- On-premises data centers
Database Backend Exposure
Dataease typically integrates with:
- MySQL/MariaDB
- PostgreSQL
- ClickHouse
- Oracle
- SQL Server
All backend databases are potentially compromised through this vulnerability.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions (Priority 1 - Within 24 Hours)
A. Emergency Patching
# Upgrade to patched version
docker pull dataease/dataease:v1.18.5
# Or via package manager
git clone https://github.com/dataease/dataease.git
git checkout v1.18.5
B. Temporary Compensating Controls
- Implement Web Application Firewall (WAF) rules:
ModSecurity rules for SQL injection patterns Block requests containing: UNION, SELECT, DROP, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE Implement strict input length limitations - Restrict network access to trusted IP ranges
- Enable database query logging for forensic analysis
Short-Term Remediation (Priority 2 - Within 1 Week)
C. Security Hardening
- Implement principle of least privilege for database accounts
- Use read-only database connections where possible
- Deploy database activity monitoring (DAM) solutions
- Enable prepared statements verification
D. Detection and Monitoring
# SIEM detection rules
- Alert on SQL keywords in HTTP parameters
- Monitor for unusual database query patterns
- Track failed authentication attempts
- Alert on information_schema access
Long-Term Strategic Measures
E. Architectural Improvements
- Migrate from blacklist to whitelist-based validation
- Implement parameterized queries/prepared statements exclusively
- Deploy Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) frameworks
- Conduct regular security code reviews
F. Security Testing Program
Quarterly penetration testing
Automated DAST/SAST scanning in CI/CD pipeline
Bug bounty program participation
Third-party security audits
Verification Procedures
Post-Patch Validation:
# Verify version
curl -I https://your-dataease-instance.com | grep -i version
# Test SQL injection protection
sqlmap -u "https://your-dataease-instance.com/api/endpoint" \
--batch --risk=3 --level=5
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory Compliance Implications
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
- Article 32: Security of processing requirements
- Article 33: Breach notification obligations (72-hour window)
- Article 34: Communication to data subjects if high risk
- Potential fines: Up to €20 million or 4% of global annual turnover
NIS2 Directive (Network and Information Security)
- Essential and important entities must report incidents within 24 hours
- Applies to critical infrastructure using data analytics platforms
- Enhanced supply chain security requirements
DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act)
- Financial entities using Dataease for analytics must assess third-party risk
- ICT risk management framework compliance required
Sector-Specific Risks
Critical Infrastructure:
- Energy sector: SCADA data visualization compromised
- Healthcare: Patient data analytics platforms vulnerable
- Finance: Trading analytics and risk management systems exposed
Government and Public Sector:
- Open data portals using Dataease
- Smart city analytics platforms
- Public health monitoring systems
ENISA Considerations
The vulnerability affects systems tracked by ENISA (European Union Agency for Cybersecurity):
- Product ID: 70cd0366-ca7d-3acb-b565-6ed0408651b7
- Vendor ID: e245c033-0544-3656-95a5-6702a83672e8
This tracking enables:
- Coordinated vulnerability disclosure