Description
Microcks up to 1.17.1 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /jobs and /artifact/download. This vulnerability allows attackers to access network resources and sensitive information via a crafted GET request.
EPSS Score:
0%
EUVD-2023-3214 Technical Analysis Report
CVE-2023-48910: Server-Side Request Forgery in Microcks
1. VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SEVERITY EVALUATION
Severity Classification
CVSS 3.1 Base Score: 9.8 (CRITICAL)
Vector Analysis (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H)
- Attack Vector (AV:N): Network-exploitable, requiring no physical or local access
- Attack Complexity (AC:L): Low complexity; no specialized conditions required
- Privileges Required (PR:N): No authentication necessary
- User Interaction (UI:N): No user interaction required for exploitation
- Scope (S:U): Unchanged; impacts remain within vulnerable component
- Confidentiality Impact (C:H): High; potential for complete information disclosure
- Integrity Impact (I:H): High; possible data modification capabilities
- Availability Impact (A:H): High; potential for service disruption
Risk Assessment
This vulnerability represents a CRITICAL security risk due to:
- Unauthenticated remote exploitation capability
- Minimal technical skill required for exploitation
- Potential for complete system compromise
- Direct access to internal network resources
- Exposure of sensitive information and credentials
2. POTENTIAL ATTACK VECTORS AND EXPLOITATION METHODS
Attack Surface
The vulnerability exists in two primary endpoints:
/jobs- Job management interface/artifact/download- Artifact retrieval functionality
Exploitation Methodology
Primary Attack Vector: SSRF via Crafted GET Requests
Typical Exploitation Flow:
1. Attacker identifies exposed Microcks instance
2. Crafts malicious GET request to vulnerable endpoints
3. Embeds internal/external URLs in request parameters
4. Server processes request and fetches attacker-specified resources
5. Response data returned to attacker or triggers secondary actions
Exploitation Scenarios
Scenario 1: Internal Network Reconnaissance
GET /artifact/download?url=http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/
GET /jobs?importUrl=http://internal-service:8080/admin
- Access cloud metadata services (AWS, Azure, GCP)
- Enumerate internal network services
- Identify internal infrastructure topology
Scenario 2: Credential Harvesting
GET /artifact/download?url=file:///etc/passwd
GET /jobs?importUrl=http://internal-credentials-store/api/keys
- Extract local system files
- Access internal credential stores
- Retrieve API keys and authentication tokens
Scenario 3: Port Scanning and Service Discovery
- Leverage timing differences to map internal networks
- Identify running services on internal hosts
- Bypass firewall restrictions using server as proxy
Scenario 4: Server-Side Code Execution (Chained Attack)
- Combine with other vulnerabilities
- Trigger deserialization attacks via fetched content
- Execute remote code through protocol handlers
Technical Exploitation Indicators
- Unusual outbound connections from Microcks server
- Requests to internal IP ranges (RFC 1918)
- Access attempts to cloud metadata endpoints
- Abnormal file:// or gopher:// protocol usage
- High volume of requests to /jobs or /artifact/download endpoints
3. AFFECTED SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE VERSIONS
Vulnerable Versions
Microcks versions ≤ 1.7.1 (all releases up to and including 1.7.1)
Deployment Contexts at Risk
Container Environments:
- Kubernetes deployments
- Docker containerized instances
- OpenShift platforms
- Cloud-native microservices architectures
Cloud Platforms:
- AWS ECS/EKS deployments
- Azure Container Instances/AKS
- Google Cloud Run/GKE
- Private cloud infrastructures
Enterprise Integration: Organizations using Microcks for:
- API mocking and testing
- Service virtualization
- Microservices development
- CI/CD pipeline integration
- Contract testing frameworks
Identification Methods
Version Detection:
# Check running container version
docker inspect <container_id> | grep -i version
# API version endpoint (if available)
curl http://<microcks-host>/api/version
# Kubernetes deployment check
kubectl get deployment microcks -o yaml | grep image:
Network Scanning:
# Identify exposed Microcks instances
nmap -p 8080,8443 -sV --script http-title <network_range>
4. RECOMMENDED MITIGATION STRATEGIES
Immediate Actions (Priority 1 - Within 24 Hours)
1. Version Upgrade
- Upgrade to Microcks version 1.8.0 or later immediately
- Verify patch application through version confirmation
- Test functionality in staging environment before production deployment
2. Network Segmentation
Implement strict network controls:
- Restrict Microcks server outbound connections
- Whitelist only necessary external domains
- Block access to internal IP ranges (10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16)
- Block cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254)
- Disable unnecessary protocol handlers (file://, gopher://, ftp://)
3. Access Control Implementation
- Implement authentication for all Microcks endpoints
- Deploy Web Application Firewall (WAF) with SSRF rules
- Restrict access to /jobs and /artifact/download endpoints
- Implement IP whitelisting for administrative functions
Short-term Mitigations (Priority 2 - Within 1 Week)
4. Web Application Firewall Rules
WAF Rule Examples:
- Block requests with internal IP addresses in parameters
- Detect and block file:// protocol usage
- Rate limit requests to vulnerable endpoints
- Implement URL validation regex patterns
- Block requests to cloud metadata services
5. Monitoring and Detection
Implement logging for:
- All requests to /jobs and /artifact/download
- Outbound connection attempts from Microcks
- Failed authentication attempts
- Unusual parameter patterns in GET requests
- Access to internal IP ranges
6. Input Validation Enhancement If immediate patching is impossible:
Implement reverse proxy with URL validation:
- Whitelist allowed domains/protocols
- Validate and sanitize URL parameters
- Reject requests containing internal IP addresses
- Block non-HTTP/HTTPS protocols
Long-term Security Measures (Priority 3 - Ongoing)
7. Security Architecture Review
- Implement zero-trust network architecture
- Deploy service mesh with egress controls
- Implement least-privilege access principles
- Regular security assessments and penetration testing
8. Vulnerability Management Program
- Subscribe to Microcks security advisories
- Implement automated vulnerability scanning
- Establish patch management procedures
- Conduct regular security audits
9. Incident Response Preparation
Develop playbooks for:
- SSRF exploitation detection
- Compromised credential rotation
- Network isolation procedures
- Forensic data collection
Compensating Controls (If Patching Delayed)
Temporary Workaround Configuration:
# Example Kubernetes NetworkPolicy
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: microcks-egress-restriction
spec:
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app: microcks
policyTypes:
- Egress
egress:
- to:
- podSelector: {}
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 443
- to:
- namespaceSelector: {}
ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 53
5. IMPACT ON EUROPEAN CYBERSECURITY LANDSCAPE
Regulatory Compliance Implications
NIS2 Directive Considerations:
- Affects essential and important entities using Microcks
- Requires incident reporting within 24 hours of detection
- Mandates implementation of appropriate security measures
- Potential