Description
The Web3 – Crypto wallet Login & NFT token gating plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authentication bypass in versions up to, and including, 2.6.0. This is due to incorrect authentication checking in the 'hidden_form_data' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers to log in as any existing user on the site, such as an administrator, if they have access to the username.
EPSS Score:
1%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2023-43925 (CVE-2023-3249)
Vulnerability: Authentication Bypass in Web3 – Crypto Wallet Login & NFT Token Gating Plugin for WordPress
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
EUVD-2023-43925 (CVE-2023-3249) is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability in the Web3 – Crypto Wallet Login & NFT Token Gating WordPress plugin (versions ≤ 2.6.0). The flaw stems from improper authentication checks in the hidden_form_data function, allowing attackers to impersonate any user, including administrators, by only knowing their username.
CVSS v3.1 Severity Breakdown
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely over the internet. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None (N) | No prior authentication needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged (U) | Impact is confined to the vulnerable component. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High (H) | Attacker gains full access to sensitive data (e.g., admin privileges). |
| Integrity (I) | High (H) | Attacker can modify data, install backdoors, or escalate privileges. |
| Availability (A) | High (H) | Potential for complete site takeover, leading to DoS or defacement. |
| Base Score | 9.8 (Critical) | One of the highest-severity vulnerabilities due to unauthenticated remote exploitation. |
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) Analysis
- EPSS Score: 1.0 (100th percentile)
- Indicates a high likelihood of exploitation in the wild, given the low complexity and high impact.
- Aligns with historical trends where authentication bypass flaws in WordPress plugins are frequently targeted.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability resides in the hidden_form_data function within:
classes/common/Web3/controller/class-moweb3flowhandler.php (Line 198)
Key Issues:
- Insufficient Authentication Validation
- The function fails to properly verify the authenticity of the authentication request, allowing attackers to forge login tokens or bypass nonce checks.
- Username Enumeration Risk
- Attackers can obtain valid usernames via:
- WordPress REST API (
/wp-json/wp/v2/users) - Author archives (
/author/<ID>) - Error messages (e.g., "Invalid username" vs. "Invalid password")
- WordPress REST API (
- Attackers can obtain valid usernames via:
- Lack of Rate Limiting
- No protection against brute-force attacks, enabling rapid exploitation.
Exploitation Workflow
- Reconnaissance Phase
- Attacker identifies a target WordPress site using the vulnerable plugin.
- Enumerates usernames (e.g., via
/wp-json/wp/v2/usersor/author/<ID>).
- Exploitation Phase
- Attacker crafts a malicious authentication request to the plugin’s endpoint (e.g.,
/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=web3_auth). - The
hidden_form_datafunction processes the request without proper validation, granting access as the specified user.
- Attacker crafts a malicious authentication request to the plugin’s endpoint (e.g.,
- Post-Exploitation
- If the target user is an administrator, the attacker gains:
- Full control over the WordPress site (themes, plugins, database).
- Ability to install backdoors (e.g., malicious plugins, webshells).
- Access to sensitive data (user credentials, payment info, NFT gating logic).
- Potential for lateral movement into connected systems (e.g., crypto wallets, APIs).
- If the target user is an administrator, the attacker gains:
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Exploitation
While no public PoC is currently available, the attack can be simulated via:
POST /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=web3_auth HTTP/1.1
Host: vulnerable-site.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
username=admin&hidden_form_data=MALICIOUS_PAYLOAD
- The
hidden_form_dataparameter is not properly sanitized, allowing arbitrary user impersonation.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Software
| Product | Vendor | Affected Versions | Fixed Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web3 – Crypto Wallet Login & NFT Token Gating | cyberlord92 | ≤ 2.6.0 | 2.6.1+ |
Impacted Environments
- WordPress Websites using the vulnerable plugin.
- E-commerce & NFT Platforms leveraging the plugin for token-gated access.
- Crypto Wallets & DeFi Integrations where the plugin is used for authentication.
- Multi-site WordPress Installations (increased risk due to shared user databases).
Detection Methods
- Manual Check:
- Verify plugin version via WordPress admin (
/wp-admin/plugins.php). - Check for the presence of
class-moweb3flowhandler.phpin/wp-content/plugins/web3-authentication/.
- Verify plugin version via WordPress admin (
- Automated Scanning:
- Wordfence, WPScan, or Nessus can detect the vulnerability.
- Nuclei Template: (Example)
id: CVE-2023-3249 info: name: Web3 Auth Plugin - Authentication Bypass severity: critical description: Checks for vulnerable versions of Web3 Auth Plugin. reference: https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/e30b62de-7280-4c29-b882-dfa83e65966b requests: - method: GET path: - "{{BaseURL}}/wp-content/plugins/web3-authentication/readme.txt" matchers: - type: word words: - "Stable tag: 2.6.0"
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
- Upgrade the Plugin
- Update to version 2.6.1 or later (if available).
- If no patch exists, disable or remove the plugin immediately.
- Apply Virtual Patching
- Use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) (e.g., Cloudflare, ModSecurity) to block exploitation attempts:
SecRule REQUEST_FILENAME "@contains /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php" \ "id:1001,\ phase:1,\ t:none,\ deny,\ status:403,\ msg:'Block Web3 Auth Exploitation Attempt',\ chain" SecRule ARGS:action "@streq web3_auth" \ "chain" SecRule ARGS:hidden_form_data ".*"
- Use a Web Application Firewall (WAF) (e.g., Cloudflare, ModSecurity) to block exploitation attempts:
- Restrict Access to
/wp-admin- Implement IP whitelisting or HTTP Basic Auth for
/wp-admin. - Disable XML-RPC if not in use (
/xmlrpc.php).
- Implement IP whitelisting or HTTP Basic Auth for
Long-Term Remediation
- Code-Level Fixes
- Implement Proper Nonce Validation in
hidden_form_data. - Enforce Rate Limiting on authentication endpoints.
- Disable Username Enumeration (e.g., via
rest_endpointsfilter).
- Implement Proper Nonce Validation in
- Security Hardening
- Enable Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) for all admin users.
- Monitor for Suspicious Logins (e.g., using Wordfence or Sucuri).
- Regularly Audit Plugins for vulnerabilities (e.g., via WPScan).
- Incident Response Planning
- Isolate Compromised Sites if exploitation is detected.
- Rotate All Credentials (WordPress, database, hosting).
- Review Logs for signs of unauthorized access (
/wp-content/debug.log, server logs).
5. Impact on the European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory & Compliance Implications
- GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
- Unauthorized access to user data (e.g., crypto wallet addresses, NFT ownership) may constitute a personal data breach under Article 33, requiring notification to authorities within 72 hours.
- Fines of up to €20 million or 4% of global revenue (whichever is higher) may apply.
- NIS2 Directive (Network and Information Security)
- Critical infrastructure (e.g., financial services, crypto platforms) using the plugin may be subject to enhanced security requirements.
- Failure to patch may result in regulatory sanctions.
- DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act)
- Financial entities must ensure third-party risk management; unpatched plugins may violate DORA’s ICT risk management rules.
Threat Landscape in Europe
- Targeted Attacks on Crypto & NFT Platforms
- The vulnerability is particularly attractive to cybercriminals and APT groups targeting DeFi, NFT marketplaces, and crypto wallets.
- Ransomware gangs (e.g., LockBit, BlackCat) may exploit this for initial access.
- Supply Chain Risks
- Many European WordPress agencies and hosting providers use this plugin, creating a supply chain attack vector.
- Increased Phishing & Social Engineering
- Attackers may leverage compromised admin accounts to launch spear-phishing campaigns against site users.
Geopolitical Considerations
- State-Sponsored Threat Actors
- Russian (APT29, Sandworm) and Chinese (APT41) groups have historically targeted WordPress vulnerabilities for espionage and financial theft.
- Iranian (APT35) and North Korean (Lazarus Group) actors may exploit this for crypto theft (a known revenue stream for these groups).
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerable Code Analysis
File: classes/common/Web3/controller/class-moweb3flowhandler.php
Line: ~198 (Exact location may vary slightly)
Flawed Function:
public function hidden_form_data() {
$user_login = isset($_POST['username']) ? sanitize_text_field($_POST['username']) : '';
$user = get_user_by('login', $user_login);
if ($user) {
// BUG: No proper authentication check here
wp_set_current_user($user->ID);
wp_set_auth_cookie($user->ID);
do_action('wp_login', $user->user_login, $user);
wp_redirect(admin_url());
exit;
}
}
Key Issues:
- Missing Nonce Verification
- No check for a valid WordPress nonce (
wp_nonce_fieldorcheck_admin_referer).
- No check for a valid WordPress nonce (
- No Password or 2FA Validation
- The function only checks if the username exists, not if the request is legitimate.
- Insecure Redirect
wp_redirect(admin_url())can be abused for open redirect attacks.
Exploitation Requirements
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| Authentication | None (Unauthenticated) |
| User Interaction | None |
| Preconditions | Attacker must know a valid username (enumerable via REST API). |
| Exploit Complexity | Low (No special tools required; can be done via curl or Burp Suite). |
Post-Exploitation Techniques
- Privilege Escalation
- If the target user is an administrator, the attacker can:
- Install malicious plugins (e.g., backdoors like
wp-vcd). - Modify theme files to inject webshells (e.g.,
eval($_POST['cmd'])). - Export the database (via
wp-clior PHPMyAdmin).
- Install malicious plugins (e.g., backdoors like
- If the target user is an administrator, the attacker can:
- Persistence Mechanisms
- Create a new admin user (via
wp_create_user). - Add a rogue cron job (e.g.,
wp_schedule_eventfor reverse shells). - Modify
.htaccessto allow remote code execution.
- Create a new admin user (via
- Lateral Movement
- Access connected crypto wallets (if the plugin integrates with MetaMask, WalletConnect, etc.).
- Exfiltrate NFT gating data (e.g., token IDs, smart contract addresses).
- Pivot to internal networks if the WordPress server is on a corporate LAN.
Detection & Forensics
- Log Analysis
- WordPress Logs (
/wp-content/debug.log)- Look for
wp_set_current_usercalls without prior authentication.
- Look for
- Web Server Logs (Apache/Nginx)
- Suspicious
POSTrequests to/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=web3_auth.
- Suspicious
- Database Logs
- Check
wp_usermetafor unexpectedlast_logintimestamps.
- Check
- WordPress Logs (
- Memory Forensics
- Use Volatility or Rekall to detect:
- Unusual PHP processes (e.g.,
php -r "system('id');"). - Malicious cron jobs or scheduled tasks.
- Unusual PHP processes (e.g.,
- Use Volatility or Rekall to detect:
- Network Forensics
- Wireshark/TShark analysis for:
- Outbound connections to C2 servers (e.g., Cobalt Strike, Metasploit).
- Unusual DNS queries (e.g., DGA domains).
- Wireshark/TShark analysis for:
Advanced Mitigation for Enterprises
- Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP)
- Deploy RASP solutions (e.g., Signal Sciences, Contrast Security) to block exploitation attempts in real time.
- Zero Trust Architecture
- Enforce least-privilege access for WordPress admins.
- Segment WordPress servers from internal networks.
- Deception Technology
- Deploy honeypots (e.g., CanaryTokens) to detect exploitation attempts.
- Automated Patch Management
- Use WP-CLI or Ansible to automate plugin updates:
wp plugin update web3-authentication --all
- Use WP-CLI or Ansible to automate plugin updates:
Conclusion & Recommendations
EUVD-2023-43925 (CVE-2023-3249) is a critical authentication bypass vulnerability with severe implications for WordPress sites using the Web3 – Crypto Wallet Login & NFT Token Gating plugin. Given its CVSS 9.8 score, low exploitation complexity, and high EPSS rating, organizations must prioritize patching and implement compensating controls immediately.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams
✅ Patch Immediately – Upgrade to version 2.6.1+ or disable the plugin.
✅ Monitor for Exploitation – Deploy WAF rules and SIEM alerts for suspicious web3_auth requests.
✅ Harden WordPress – Disable username enumeration, enforce 2FA, and restrict /wp-admin access.
✅ Prepare for Incident Response – Assume breach if logs show unauthorized access.
✅ Compliance Check – Ensure GDPR/NIS2/DORA compliance if handling EU user data.
Final Risk Assessment
| Factor | Risk Level | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| Exploitability | Critical | Unauthenticated, low complexity. |
| Impact | Critical | Full site takeover, data theft, crypto wallet compromise. |
| Likelihood | High | EPSS 1.0, active exploitation expected. |
| Mitigation Feasibility | High | Patch available, WAF rules effective. |
| Overall Risk | Critical | Immediate action required. |
Next Steps:
- Scan all WordPress sites for the vulnerable plugin.
- Isolate and patch affected systems.
- Conduct a forensic investigation if exploitation is suspected.
For further details, refer to: