Description
A remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in the berriai/litellm project due to improper control of the generation of code when using the `eval` function unsafely in the `litellm.get_secret()` method. Specifically, when the server utilizes Google KMS, untrusted data is passed to the `eval` function without any sanitization. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious values into environment variables through the `/config/update` endpoint, which allows for the update of settings in `proxy_server_config.yaml`.
EPSS Score:
2%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2024-1491
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
The vulnerability EUVD-2024-1491, also known as CVE-2024-4264, is a remote code execution (RCE) issue in the berriai/litellm project. The vulnerability arises from the unsafe use of the eval function in the litellm.get_secret() method, particularly when the server interacts with Google KMS. Untrusted data is passed to the eval function without proper sanitization, allowing attackers to inject malicious code.
Severity Evaluation:
- CVSS Base Score: 9.8
- CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The high CVSS score indicates a critical vulnerability due to its potential for remote exploitation without user interaction, leading to high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Environment Variable Injection: Attackers can inject malicious values into environment variables through the
/config/updateendpoint, which updates settings inproxy_server_config.yaml. - Unsanitized Data: The
evalfunction processes unsanitized data, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code.
Exploitation Methods:
- Code Injection: By crafting specific payloads, attackers can inject code that will be executed by the
evalfunction. - Configuration Manipulation: Attackers can manipulate the configuration settings to introduce malicious code that will be executed during the normal operation of the server.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Systems:
- Any system running the
berriai/litellmproject that utilizes Google KMS and has the/config/updateendpoint exposed.
Software Versions:
- All versions of
berriai/litellmup to the latest release at the time of the vulnerability disclosure.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Disable the
/config/updateEndpoint: Temporarily disable the/config/updateendpoint to prevent configuration updates until a patch is applied. - Input Sanitization: Implement strict input sanitization for all environment variables and configuration settings.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Patch Deployment: Apply the official patch provided by the
berriai/litellmmaintainers as soon as it is available. - Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review to identify and remediate similar vulnerabilities.
- Security Audits: Regularly perform security audits and penetration testing to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
The vulnerability poses a significant risk to organizations using the berriai/litellm project, particularly those in critical sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government. The potential for remote code execution can lead to data breaches, service disruptions, and unauthorized access to sensitive information. This underscores the importance of robust security practices and timely patch management in the European cybersecurity landscape.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerable Code Sections:
litellm.get_secret()Method: The method uses theevalfunction unsafely, allowing for the execution of arbitrary code./config/updateEndpoint: This endpoint allows for the update of settings inproxy_server_config.yaml, which can be manipulated to inject malicious values.
References:
- NVD Entry: CVE-2024-4264
- GitHub Repository: BerriAI/litellm
- Specific Code Lines:
Additional Resources:
- Huntr Bounty: Huntr Bounty
Conclusion: This vulnerability highlights the critical importance of secure coding practices, particularly in handling user inputs and configuration settings. Organizations must prioritize timely patching and continuous monitoring to mitigate such risks effectively.