Description
A Python command injection vulnerability exists in the `SagemakerLLM` class's `complete()` method within `./private_gpt/components/llm/custom/sagemaker.py` of the imartinez/privategpt application, versions up to and including 0.3.0. The vulnerability arises due to the use of the `eval()` function to parse a string received from a remote AWS SageMaker LLM endpoint into a dictionary. This method of parsing is unsafe as it can execute arbitrary Python code contained within the response. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the response from the AWS SageMaker LLM endpoint to include malicious Python code, leading to potential execution of arbitrary commands on the system hosting the application. The issue is fixed in version 0.6.0.
EPSS Score:
1%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2024-43982
1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation
The vulnerability described in EUVD-2024-43982 is a Python command injection vulnerability within the SagemakerLLM class's complete() method in the imartinez/privategpt application. This vulnerability arises from the unsafe use of the eval() function to parse a string received from a remote AWS SageMaker LLM endpoint into a dictionary. The eval() function can execute arbitrary Python code, making it a critical security risk.
Severity Evaluation:
- CVSS Base Score: 9.8
- CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The high CVSS score indicates a critical vulnerability due to the following factors:
- Attack Vector (AV:N): Network-based attack, meaning it can be exploited remotely.
- Attack Complexity (AC:L): Low complexity, indicating that the attack does not require specialized conditions.
- Privileges Required (PR:N): No privileges are required to exploit the vulnerability.
- User Interaction (UI:N): No user interaction is required.
- Scope (S:U): The vulnerability affects the same security scope.
- Confidentiality (C:H), Integrity (I:H), and Availability (A:H): High impact on all three CIA triad components.
2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods
Attack Vectors:
- Manipulated AWS SageMaker LLM Response: An attacker could intercept or manipulate the response from the AWS SageMaker LLM endpoint to include malicious Python code.
- MitM (Man-in-the-Middle) Attacks: An attacker could perform a MitM attack to inject malicious code into the response.
Exploitation Methods:
- Code Injection: By injecting malicious Python code into the response, an attacker can execute arbitrary commands on the system hosting the application.
- Data Exfiltration: The attacker could use the injected code to exfiltrate sensitive data.
- System Compromise: The attacker could gain control over the system, leading to further exploitation and potential lateral movement within the network.
3. Affected Systems and Software Versions
Affected Software:
- Application: imartinez/privategpt
- Versions: Up to and including 0.3.0
Fixed Version:
- The vulnerability is fixed in version 0.6.0.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Mitigation:
- Upgrade: Upgrade to version 0.6.0 or later of the imartinez/privategpt application.
- Temporary Workaround: Disable or restrict access to the
complete()method until the upgrade is performed.
Long-Term Mitigation:
- Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review to identify and remove any other instances of unsafe
eval()usage. - Input Validation: Implement robust input validation and sanitization for all data received from external sources.
- Secure Coding Practices: Adopt secure coding practices and use safer alternatives to
eval(), such asast.literal_eval()for parsing strings into dictionaries.
5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape
The vulnerability poses a significant risk to organizations using the imartinez/privategpt application, particularly those relying on AWS SageMaker LLM endpoints. The potential for remote code execution and data exfiltration could lead to severe breaches, impacting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of sensitive information. This underscores the importance of regular security audits and timely patch management in the European cybersecurity landscape.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Vulnerability Details:
- File:
./private_gpt/components/llm/custom/sagemaker.py - Class:
SagemakerLLM - Method:
complete() - Vulnerable Code: Use of
eval()to parse a string into a dictionary.
Example of Vulnerable Code:
response = eval(remote_response)
Example of Secure Code:
import ast
response = ast.literal_eval(remote_response)
References:
- Huntr Bounty: Huntr Bounty
- GitHub Commit: GitHub Commit
Additional Information:
- CVE ID: CVE-2024-4343
- EPSS Score: 1
- ENISA ID Product: [{"id":"cea8d112-91ed-36f0-854c-14d1d58966bb","product":{"name":"imartinez/privategpt"},"product_version":"unspecified <0.6.0"}]
- ENISA ID Vendor: [{"id":"9a22404d-aea2-30eb-8be5-b7d3fd5077f1","vendor":{"name":"imartinez"}}]
By addressing this vulnerability promptly and adopting secure coding practices, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of exploitation and enhance their overall cybersecurity posture.