Description
In lunary-ai/lunary version 1.2.2, an account hijacking vulnerability exists due to a password reset token leak. A user with a 'viewer' role can exploit this vulnerability to hijack another user's account by obtaining the password reset token. The vulnerability is triggered when the 'viewer' role user sends a specific request to the server, which responds with a password reset token in the 'recoveryToken' parameter. This token can then be used to reset the password of another user's account without authorization. The issue results from an excessive attack surface, allowing lower-privileged users to escalate their privileges and take over accounts.
EPSS Score:
0%
Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2024-55392 (CVE-2024-5386)
Account Hijacking via Password Reset Token Leak in Lunary AI
1. Vulnerability Assessment & Severity Evaluation
Vulnerability Overview
EUVD-2024-55392 (CVE-2024-5386) is a critical privilege escalation and account hijacking vulnerability in Lunary AI (lunary-ai/lunary) version 1.2.2. The flaw stems from an insecure password reset token exposure, allowing a low-privileged user with a 'viewer' role to obtain and misuse another user’s password reset token, leading to unauthorized account takeover.
CVSS v3.0 Severity Analysis
| Metric | Value | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Base Score | 9.6 (Critical) | High impact on confidentiality and integrity with low attack complexity. |
| Attack Vector (AV) | Network (N) | Exploitable remotely over the network. |
| Attack Complexity (AC) | Low (L) | No special conditions required; straightforward exploitation. |
| Privileges Required (PR) | Low (L) | Only a 'viewer' role is needed, which is a low-privilege account. |
| User Interaction (UI) | None (N) | No victim interaction is required. |
| Scope (S) | Changed (C) | Impacts other users' accounts beyond the attacker’s privilege level. |
| Confidentiality (C) | High (H) | Attacker gains full access to another user’s account. |
| Integrity (I) | High (H) | Attacker can modify account credentials and data. |
| Availability (A) | None (N) | No direct impact on system availability. |
Justification for Critical Severity:
- Low-privilege exploitation (only 'viewer' role required).
- Remote attack vector (no physical access needed).
- High impact (full account takeover, data exfiltration, and unauthorized modifications).
- Changed scope (affects other users, not just the attacker’s session).
2. Potential Attack Vectors & Exploitation Methods
Exploitation Workflow
-
Reconnaissance Phase
- Attacker identifies a target user (e.g., an admin or high-privilege account).
- Attacker logs in with a 'viewer' role account.
-
Token Leak Exploitation
- Attacker sends a crafted HTTP request (likely a GET/POST to an API endpoint) that triggers the server to expose a password reset token in the response.
- The token is returned in the
recoveryTokenparameter (or similar JSON field).
-
Token Misuse
- Attacker uses the leaked token to reset the target user’s password via the legitimate password reset flow.
- Attacker gains full control of the victim’s account.
Technical Exploitation Details
- Vulnerable Endpoint: Likely a password reset initiation or account recovery API (e.g.,
/api/auth/reset-request). - Token Exposure Mechanism:
- Improper access control – The endpoint does not validate the requesting user’s role before generating/exposing the token.
- Insecure response handling – The token is included in the response even for low-privilege users.
- Token Validity: If the token has a long expiration time, the attacker has a larger window to exploit it.
Proof-of-Concept (PoC) Scenario
GET /api/auth/reset-request?email=admin@example.com HTTP/1.1
Host: lunary.example.com
Authorization: Bearer <viewer_user_token>
Response:
{
"status": "success",
"recoveryToken": "a1b2c3d4e5f6g7h8i9j0k1l2m3n4o5p6"
}
Attacker then uses the token to reset the admin’s password:
POST /api/auth/reset-password HTTP/1.1
Host: lunary.example.com
Content-Type: application/json
{
"token": "a1b2c3d4e5f6g7h8i9j0k1l2m3n4o5p6",
"newPassword": "AttackerControlled123!"
}
3. Affected Systems & Software Versions
Impacted Product
- Software: Lunary AI (lunary-ai/lunary)
- Vulnerable Version: 1.2.2
- Fixed Version: 1.2.14+ (as per ENISA ID Product reference)
- Vendor: lunary-ai
Deployment Context
- Cloud-based AI/ML platforms using Lunary for model management.
- Enterprise environments where Lunary is integrated into internal workflows.
- Multi-tenant SaaS applications where 'viewer' roles are assigned to external users.
4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies
Immediate Remediation (Vendor Fix)
-
Upgrade to Patched Version
- Immediate action: Upgrade to Lunary v1.2.14 or later (or the latest stable release).
- Verification: Confirm the fix via the GitHub commit: fc7ab3d5621c18992da5dab3a2a9a8d227d42311.
-
Temporary Workarounds (If Upgrade Not Possible)
- Disable password reset functionality for non-admin users via feature flags.
- Implement IP-based rate limiting on password reset endpoints.
- Log and monitor all password reset requests for suspicious activity.
Long-Term Security Improvements
-
Access Control Hardening
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) Review:
- Ensure 'viewer' roles cannot trigger password reset flows.
- Implement least privilege for all API endpoints.
- Token Generation Logic:
- Bind tokens to the requesting user’s session (e.g., JWT claims).
- Shorten token expiration (e.g., 15-30 minutes).
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) Review:
-
Secure Token Handling
- Never expose tokens in API responses unless explicitly required.
- Use one-time-use tokens (invalidated after first use).
- Encrypt tokens at rest and in transit.
-
Enhanced Logging & Monitoring
- Log all password reset attempts (including source IP, user agent, and timestamp).
- Alert on anomalous reset patterns (e.g., multiple requests from a single IP).
- Implement SIEM integration for real-time threat detection.
-
Security Testing & Code Review
- Conduct penetration testing on authentication flows.
- Static Application Security Testing (SAST) to detect similar flaws.
- Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) to validate fixes.
5. Impact on the European Cybersecurity Landscape
Regulatory & Compliance Implications
- GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation):
- Article 32 (Security of Processing): Organizations must implement appropriate technical measures to prevent unauthorized access.
- Article 33 (Data Breach Notification): If exploited, affected organizations must report the breach within 72 hours if it poses a risk to individuals.
- NIS2 Directive (Network and Information Security):
- Critical infrastructure providers using Lunary may be subject to enhanced security requirements.
- Incident reporting obligations apply if the vulnerability leads to a significant disruption.
Sector-Specific Risks
| Sector | Potential Impact |
|---|---|
| Healthcare | Unauthorized access to patient data, HIPAA/GDPR violations. |
| Financial Services | Account takeovers leading to fraud, PSD2 compliance risks. |
| Government & Defense | Espionage risks if used in classified AI model management. |
| Critical Infrastructure | Disruption of AI-driven operational technology (OT) systems. |
Threat Actor Motivations
- Cybercriminals: Financial gain via ransomware, fraud, or data theft.
- State-Sponsored Actors: Espionage, intellectual property theft (AI models).
- Insider Threats: Disgruntled employees or contractors abusing 'viewer' access.
European Cybersecurity Response
- ENISA (European Union Agency for Cybersecurity):
- May issue advisories for critical infrastructure operators.
- Could include this vulnerability in threat intelligence reports.
- CERT-EU (Computer Emergency Response Team for EU Institutions):
- Likely to track exploitation attempts and issue alerts.
- National CSIRTs (Computer Security Incident Response Teams):
- May recommend patching to organizations under their jurisdiction.
6. Technical Details for Security Professionals
Root Cause Analysis
- Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR):
- The password reset endpoint does not validate whether the requesting user has permission to generate a token for another account.
- Broken Access Control (OWASP Top 10 - A01:2021):
- The 'viewer' role should never be able to trigger password resets for other users.
- Information Exposure (CWE-200):
- The
recoveryTokenis leaked in the API response, violating the principle of least privilege.
- The
Exploitability Indicators
| Indicator | Description |
|---|---|
| HTTP Response Analysis | Check for recoveryToken in API responses when a 'viewer' requests a password reset. |
| Token Lifetime | If tokens are long-lived, exploitation risk increases. |
| Rate Limiting | Absence of rate limiting on password reset endpoints. |
| Logging Gaps | Lack of logs for password reset attempts by low-privilege users. |
Detection & Hunting Strategies
- SIEM Rules for Exploitation Attempts
- Query:
event.action:"password_reset" AND user.role:"viewer" - Alert: Multiple password reset requests from a single 'viewer' account.
- Query:
- Network Traffic Analysis
- Look for: Unusual
GET/POSTrequests to/api/auth/reset-*endpoints from 'viewer' IPs.
- Look for: Unusual
- Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR)
- Monitor: Suspicious process execution (e.g.,
curlorPostmanmaking reset requests).
- Monitor: Suspicious process execution (e.g.,
- Honeypot Tokens
- Deploy: Fake
recoveryTokenvalues in responses and monitor for misuse.
- Deploy: Fake
Forensic Investigation Steps (Post-Exploitation)
- Identify Compromised Accounts
- Check last password change timestamps for anomalies.
- Review login logs for unexpected sessions.
- Trace Attacker Activity
- Analyze:
User-Agent,IP addresses, andtimestampsof reset requests. - Correlate: With other suspicious activities (e.g., data exfiltration).
- Analyze:
- Token Revocation & Rotation
- Invalidate all active reset tokens immediately.
- Force password resets for all high-privilege accounts.
Conclusion & Recommendations
EUVD-2024-55392 (CVE-2024-5386) represents a critical security flaw in Lunary AI that enables low-privilege account hijacking. Given its CVSS 9.6 rating, organizations using affected versions must prioritize patching and implement compensating controls if immediate upgrades are not feasible.
Key Takeaways for Security Teams
✅ Patch Immediately: Upgrade to Lunary v1.2.14+. ✅ Audit Access Controls: Ensure 'viewer' roles cannot trigger password resets. ✅ Monitor for Exploitation: Deploy SIEM rules to detect token leaks. ✅ Review Compliance: Assess GDPR/NIS2 implications if exploited. ✅ Conduct Penetration Testing: Validate fixes and check for similar flaws.
Final Risk Assessment:
- Likelihood: High (easy to exploit, low-privilege requirement).
- Impact: Critical (full account takeover, data breach potential).
- Risk Level: Extreme (requires immediate action).
For further details, refer to the Huntr bounty report and GitHub commit linked in the original EUVD entry.