EUVD-2025-14173

Comprehensive Technical Analysis of EUVD-2025-14173

1. Vulnerability Assessment and Severity Evaluation

The vulnerability identified in the EUVD entry EUVD-2025-14173 pertains to an SQL Injection flaw in the SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0. Specifically, the vulnerability resides in the user_delivery_update.php script via the order_id POST parameter.

Severity Evaluation:

• Base Score: 9.8 (Critical)
• Base Score Version: CVSS 3.1
• Base Score Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

The CVSS score of 9.8 indicates a critical vulnerability. The vector string breakdown is as follows:

• AV:N (Attack Vector: Network) - The vulnerability is exploitable over the network.
• AC:L (Attack Complexity: Low) - The attack requires low complexity to exploit.
• PR:N (Privileges Required: None) - No privileges are required to exploit the vulnerability.
• UI:N (User Interaction: None) - No user interaction is required.
• S:U (Scope: Unchanged) - The vulnerability does not change the security scope.
• C:H (Confidentiality: High) - There is a high impact on confidentiality.
• I:H (Integrity: High) - There is a high impact on integrity.
• A:H (Availability: High) - There is a high impact on availability.

2. Potential Attack Vectors and Exploitation Methods

Attack Vectors:

• SQL Injection: An attacker can inject malicious SQL code into the order_id POST parameter to manipulate the database queries.
• Blind SQL Injection: Given the reference to blind SQL injection, the attacker may use techniques to infer database structure and data without direct error messages.

Exploitation Methods:

• Direct SQL Injection: Crafting SQL queries that can extract, modify, or delete data.
• Blind SQL Injection: Using techniques like time-based or boolean-based methods to extract information without direct feedback.

3. Affected Systems and Software Versions

Affected Systems:

• SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0

Software Versions:

• Version 1.0 of the SourceCodester Client Database Management System

4. Recommended Mitigation Strategies

Immediate Mitigation:

• Input Validation: Implement strict input validation and sanitization for the order_id parameter.
• Prepared Statements: Use prepared statements with parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.
• Web Application Firewall (WAF): Deploy a WAF to detect and block SQL injection attempts.

Long-Term Mitigation:

• Code Review: Conduct a thorough code review to identify and fix similar vulnerabilities.
• Security Training: Provide security training for developers to understand and prevent SQL injection vulnerabilities.
• Regular Updates: Ensure that the software is regularly updated to the latest version with security patches.

5. Impact on European Cybersecurity Landscape

The vulnerability poses a significant risk to organizations using the SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 within the European Union. Given the critical nature of the vulnerability, it could lead to data breaches, unauthorized access, and potential financial losses. The EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) mandates stringent data protection measures, and failure to address such vulnerabilities could result in regulatory penalties.

6. Technical Details for Security Professionals

Vulnerability Details:

• Vulnerable Component: user_delivery_update.php
• Vulnerable Parameter: order_id POST parameter
• Exploitation: Injecting SQL code into the order_id parameter can manipulate database queries.

Example Exploit:

order_id=1' OR '1'='1

This payload could bypass authentication or extract sensitive data.

References:

• Invicti Blind SQL Injection
• GitHub Mitre CVE-2025-46190
• NVD CVE-2025-46190

Aliases:

• CVE-2025-46190

Assigner:

• Mitre

EPSS:

• N/A

ENISA ID Product and Vendor:

• Product ID: 51ac9af5-31c0-3257-b30f-7ca7e5c1b3c5
• Vendor ID: be4427c9-8313-3a09-8962-2f95bae2c887

Conclusion: The SQL Injection vulnerability in SourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 is critical and requires immediate attention. Organizations should prioritize patching and implementing robust security measures to mitigate the risk. Regular audits and adherence to best practices in secure coding will help prevent similar vulnerabilities in the future.